09-06-2019, 12:26 PM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: O.C. CA
Posts: 3,709
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert986
Old subject, but.. What about 987 headers, would oem 987 headers fit? Would 987 equal length aftermarket headers be even better than the cheap 986 equal length headers?
I know I always have a lot of questions, but soon I hope to be providing answers also :-) The thing is that I really plan to do "the big bang" with intake, exhaust and custom tune.. I want to understand it all before I start. The roadmap looks like this:
1) ASAP: Headers, I´m a bit afraid that the bolts are totally rusted/stuck and needs to be drilled out, you know.. So I will adress this first, while the car is still running so I can take it to a pro garage if I get stuck.
2) Midpipes with 200cel cats, when the headers are in place I do this.
3) During winter: Hope to be able to build my own "end system/cat back" I have some fun ideas I can´t wait to try out.
During the winter I also plan to do the whole intake part, airbag, MAF, throttle, plenum 996 intake.
4 Springtime: Time for a custom tune and possible get some figures from the dyno.
So.. This is why I´, all over the forum and asking things about intake AND exhaust.. bear with me..
|
987 exhaust manifolds will bolt-on to the engine but it will require custom pipes to be fabricated to the muffler. I have a set of 987 Fabspeed manifolds with cats that I bought to install on my Box S but recently got a set of 986 Fabspeed manifolds & cat delete pipes for a good deal I am installing instead.
I will be selling the 987 Fabspeed manifolds soon.
__________________
OE engine rebuilt,3.6 litre LN Engineering billet sleeves,triple row IMSB,LN rods. Deep sump oil pan with DT40 oil.
|
|
|
09-06-2019, 01:44 PM
|
#2
|
550 Anniversary
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Surrey, UK
Posts: 747
|
Bang for buck the eBay stuff is fine. I've used the eBay manifolds again on my 2nd 986. The latest configuration is with 200cell cats and Carnewal. I did plenty of Dyno runs on my previous car. You can spend plenty more on Cargraphic, FVD etc but will you really get that much more. Ditto the IPD kit. For a fraction of the price you can get the 996 throttle body and plenum and a couple of jubilee clips and silicone tube and you're done for very little outlay. Been there done that and would do it again the same way. My remap was a half day on the Dyno and cost me £350 back in 2013.
|
|
|
09-07-2019, 10:40 AM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: O.C. CA
Posts: 3,709
|
Generally speaking installing most catless headers will decrease low RPM torque which is what gets the car moving & the headers increase power at high rpm. That's why I sold my headers & bought Fabspeed sport cat manifolds for my 3.6 litre.
__________________
OE engine rebuilt,3.6 litre LN Engineering billet sleeves,triple row IMSB,LN rods. Deep sump oil pan with DT40 oil.
|
|
|
09-07-2019, 12:58 PM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Dahlonega , Georgia
Posts: 1,353
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BYprodriver
Generally speaking installing most catless headers will decrease low RPM torque which is what gets the car moving & the headers increase power at high rpm. That's why I sold my headers & bought Fabspeed sport cat manifolds for my 3.6 litre.
|
I tend to agree there is a trade off with exhaust , I wonder if smaller tube straight headers ( no cats ) help with torque vs. larger diameter ? I made 252 lb ft of torque recently with mine and I have cheap Chinese headers , no cats , cat delete pipes and a stock muffler with PSE style bypass pipes . I also made over 282 hp at the wheels which would suggest my setup flows pretty well . Common sense tells me going with a larger diameter exhaust will yield more HP but " may " give up too much torque . It is a fine line . Have you dyno'd your setup ?
__________________
2002 Boxster S Arctic Silver with black top with glass window and black leather interior. Jake Raby 3.6 SS ( the beast ) with IMS Solution. 996 GT3 front bumper , GT3 rocker covers and GT3TEK rear diffuser and Joe Toth composites rear ducktail spoiler .
|
|
|
09-08-2019, 09:07 AM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: O.C. CA
Posts: 3,709
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rfuerst911sc
I tend to agree there is a trade off with exhaust , I wonder if smaller tube straight headers ( no cats ) help with torque vs. larger diameter ? I made 252 lb ft of torque recently with mine and I have cheap Chinese headers , no cats , cat delete pipes and a stock muffler with PSE style bypass pipes . I also made over 282 hp at the wheels which would suggest my setup flows pretty well . Common sense tells me going with a larger diameter exhaust will yield more HP but " may " give up too much torque . It is a fine line . Have you dyno'd your setup ?
|
It's all about what rpm you want max efficientcy & then optimize pipe diameter for that rpm. For street driving I shoot for 3000rpm. Your engine is so unique I would ask JR what you should use. I try to have everything ceramic coated to keep the heat inside also.
__________________
OE engine rebuilt,3.6 litre LN Engineering billet sleeves,triple row IMSB,LN rods. Deep sump oil pan with DT40 oil.
|
|
|
09-17-2019, 03:43 AM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Manchester UK
Posts: 51
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BYprodriver
It's all about what rpm you want max efficientcy & then optimize pipe diameter for that rpm. For street driving I shoot for 3000rpm. Your engine is so unique I would ask JR what you should use. I try to have everything ceramic coated to keep the heat inside also.
|
Is the 3000 rpm a typo or is there something I am missing?
|
|
|
09-07-2019, 12:46 PM
|
#7
|
550 Anniversary
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Surrey, UK
Posts: 747
|
In Europe the OE headers are already catless. We only have the cats in the mid section. They're normally 400cell but most 'sport' cats are 200 or 100 cell. I've tried lots of permutations of exhaust set up on the 550 I now have but haven't bothered to Dyno test any as I did all that on my previous Boxster.
|
|
|
09-18-2019, 06:28 AM
|
#8
|
Racer Boy
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 946
|
Do you drive your Boxster on the street at redline all the time, or do you use the entire rev range? Personally, I rarely ever go near redline when driving on the street in my car.
What BY is saying is that you want headers that will work over the expected rev range. Most people aren't flogging their cars at redline on the street, so the headers should be tuned to work well from 2K to 7K. You can tune an exhaust to make maximum power at redline, but then the car won't have much torque and will be a dog to drive in a normal manner.
|
|
|
09-18-2019, 01:47 PM
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Manchester UK
Posts: 51
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Racer Boy
Do you drive your Boxster on the street at redline all the time, or do you use the entire rev range? Personally, I rarely ever go near redline when driving on the street in my car.
What BY is saying is that you want headers that will work over the expected rev range. Most people aren't flogging their cars at redline on the street, so the headers should be tuned to work well from 2K to 7K. You can tune an exhaust to make maximum power at redline, but then the car won't have much torque and will be a dog to drive in a normal manner.
|
Mine is not an every day car, when I drive it for fun (in the company of many other Boxsters) we would use the entire rev range from 3000 upwards all the way to the redline. but all in the lowers gears on what we call "B" roads. These are narrow, twisty and largely empty, perfect Boxster territory.
I certainly don't want to get into an online row but there seems to be an awful lot of work done to that car just to potter around. Like I say maybe it is just different driving styles and priorities, the idea that was put forward was so alien to the way we use our cars I thought it might be a typo
|
|
|
09-18-2019, 07:19 PM
|
#10
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: toronto
Posts: 2,668
|
Hmmm are we saying cat less headers reduce low end torque. Don’t want anymore of that as my car is all street now. I had thought those and mid cats along the stock can was best in most regimes.
I was planning on creating an catless header experience thread so that performance, price, fit and finish could all be compiled.
I would not have considered FabS catted headers to be superior to the above set up especially when considering the price
__________________
986 00S
|
|
|
09-19-2019, 12:05 AM
|
#11
|
550 Anniversary
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Surrey, UK
Posts: 747
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaykay
Hmmm are we saying cat less headers reduce low end torque. Don’t want anymore of that as my car is all street now. I had thought those and mid cats along the stock can was best in most regimes.
I was planning on creating an catless header experience thread so that performance, price, fit and finish could all be compiled.
I would not have considered FabS catted headers to be superior to the above set up especially when considering the price
|
In Europe all the 986 are catless headers. A sample of one granted but based on my Dyno runs including a baseline there is no loss of torque anywhere once you layer up the mods like tubular manifolds, larger throttle body, remap. In fact the gains start just after 3.5k rpm and carry in right through to the redline.
|
|
|
09-19-2019, 07:20 AM
|
#12
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: O.C. CA
Posts: 3,709
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaykay
Hmmm are we saying cat less headers reduce low end torque. Don’t want anymore of that as my car is all street now. I had thought those and mid cats along the stock can was best in most regimes.
I was planning on creating an catless header experience thread so that performance, price, fit and finish could all be compiled.
I would not have considered FabS catted headers to be superior to the above set up especially when considering the price
|
I'm installing FabS with sport cats because I got a new one from a forum member for $350 & Headers would be louder than what I want. This is the last piece of my Ideal Box once I get the sport seats installed.
__________________
OE engine rebuilt,3.6 litre LN Engineering billet sleeves,triple row IMSB,LN rods. Deep sump oil pan with DT40 oil.
|
|
|
09-19-2019, 12:07 PM
|
#13
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 375
|
Last edited by Robert986; 09-19-2019 at 12:11 PM.
|
|
|
09-18-2019, 07:25 AM
|
#14
|
inveniam viam aut faciam
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Arvada, CO
Posts: 441
|
I think that best flow at 3k RPM is probably just about right. The last long trip I had in my S involved almost 15 hours at a bit over 3k RPM in 6th gear. I averaged almost 29 mpg, even with the top down most of the way. Not bad IMO considering the speed.
__________________
'03 S, manual, 18" Carrera wheels, PSM, PSE, Litronic, 996 Cluster, +
|
|
|
09-18-2019, 09:11 AM
|
#15
|
Who's askin'?
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Utah
Posts: 2,448
|
I typed a very long reply to this yesterday.... but the internet God's saved you all from it, by it disappearing before I could post it.
Most people, when "tuning" (or modifying) a car for street use, look to get as much area "under the line" as possible. Think about a HP line on a graph, say from a dyno-run. You want to get that line as high as possible across the entire range, not simply shoot for a high peak hp. What's being suggested here, is that for street use, a 5% increase beginning at 3000rpm and moving up from there is worth more than a 10% increase at 7000rpm. Now certainly YMMV, depending on your own driving habits, and what the streets in your neighborhood look like.
And while we're at it; I'm sure BYP understands that talking only about diameter of the primary tube is like talking about a fraction with only a numerator, haha. The length of the primary and shape of the collector are part of that equation as well. It's amazing how much tuning can really happen with a header, though those benefits are rarely realized by a simple header change alone; the header shape should be part of the entire engine design from the start. (I'm sure that's why he suggested to the OP that he should refer to the engine builder for a recommendation)
I've built several headers over the years, from very high-revving in-line 4 cylinders, to big-inch V8's, to air-cooled-twin motorcycles..... etc etc. It's more art than science, when you suck at math like I do. hahaha.
|
|
|
09-19-2019, 01:46 PM
|
#16
|
550 Anniversary
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Surrey, UK
Posts: 747
|
The cheap ones are fine. I have used them on both my Boxsters the first time being in 2012. Current set been on this car since 2013. You can spend a tonne more money for some FVD or Cargraphic ones for not a whole lot more gain.
|
|
|
09-19-2019, 01:47 PM
|
#17
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 406
|
As has been noted here previously, aftermarket eBay header fitment can be hit or miss. Some seem to fit and align perfectly, while others are off enough so as to be practically unusable. And there is no good way to predict this beforehand - you just have to roll the dice and hope that you get lucky.
Assuming that you currently are running the Euro non-cat manifolds, my personal opinion is that for most practical street-driven purposes, there is not going to be a huge performance gain to be had via the use of headers. Accordingly, if I were in your shoes, I would choose to keep things simple and would retain the OEM manifolds.
You would then end up with a system such as I posted on Page 1, Post 19 in this thread, reposted below:
And here's the finished view:
__________________
2000 Ocean Blue Boxster S
1980 Ferrari 308 GTSi
2019 Alfa Romeo Giulia Ti Sport AWD
|
|
|
10-01-2019, 10:51 AM
|
#18
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Finland
Posts: 343
|
This is the setup I just purchased - thank you for the great idea 
How did you do the O2 sensors? did you use the original ones and did you need extensions for the cables or did they fit as is?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave80GTSi
Assuming that you currently are running the Euro non-cat manifolds, my personal opinion is that for most practical street-driven purposes, there is not going to be a huge performance gain to be had via the use of headers. Accordingly, if I were in your shoes, I would choose to keep things simple and would retain the OEM manifolds.
You would then end up with a system such as I posted on Page 1, Post 19 in this thread, reposted below:
And here's the finished view:

|
Last edited by pilot4fn; 10-01-2019 at 08:12 PM.
|
|
|
09-19-2019, 01:53 PM
|
#19
|
550 Anniversary
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Surrey, UK
Posts: 747
|
Just changing the OE manifolds out for the cheap eBay ones you can feel the engine rev a little freer especially in the last 1000rpm. If they are coming off anyway then you may as well change them.
|
|
|
09-19-2019, 05:27 PM
|
#20
|
Who's askin'?
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Utah
Posts: 2,448
|
Have y'all seen the new ones just released from soul performance for the 986?
Damn sexy.....
https://soulpp.com/?s=986
Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:50 AM.
| |