Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Performance and Technical Chat

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-05-2024, 10:01 AM   #1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Illinois
Posts: 220
Garage
M96 crank

I'm looking for input from someone with experience rebuilding these.
I have a 3.2 which suffered from a clogged oil pump inlet as a result of cam pads disintegrating. The end result was a trashed rod bearing and some very unhappy mains but without scoring. A pro engine builder polished the crank and called it good.
I have reassembled with new bearings and ARP case bolts. It spins freely--to a point. There seems to be a tight spot. Now i have another crank which is undamaged, and I intend to mic. The question is should I just move to the other crank, or go through all the bearings to see if one is out of spec?

__________________
A cynic is a man who, when he smells flowers, looks around for a coffin.
-H. L. Mencken
Newsguy is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2024, 02:16 PM   #2
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: North Cali
Posts: 816
Garage
There should not be any tight spot. Make sure you torque the bolts to spec and in the correct sequence. If still there is a tight spot, disassemble the unit and re-inspect each part. Did you replace the thrust bearing? The endfloat also should be checked.
Homeoboxter is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2024, 03:33 PM   #3
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: It's a kind of magic.....
Posts: 6,482
Quote:
Originally Posted by Newsguy View Post
I The question is should I just move to the other crank, or go through all the bearings to see if one is out of spec?
You shouldn't be assembling the engine without first assembling the rods and crank carrier with just the bearing shells in them and checking them with an inside micrometer or bore gauge, and then comparing those values to crank journal diameters to determine the actual bearing clearnaces.
__________________
Anything really new is invented only in one’s youth. Later, one becomes more experienced, more famous – and more stupid.” - Albert Einstein
JFP in PA is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2024, 07:14 PM   #4
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: North Cali
Posts: 816
Garage
At the very least measure the clearances all around with plastigauge.
Homeoboxter is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2024, 07:43 AM   #5
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Illinois
Posts: 220
Garage
I did plastigage the clearances and they were within tolerance.
New thrust bearings also checked.
I will be checking clearances with a mic.
Thanks for the input.
__________________
A cynic is a man who, when he smells flowers, looks around for a coffin.
-H. L. Mencken
Newsguy is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2024, 12:55 PM   #6
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Norway
Posts: 198
Some people claim these cranks can't be ground because the hardened layer is too thin. Did the machinist test the hardness of the reground rod pin?

I just measured my own crank and found 0.0012" / 0.03mm runout. I was told by LN engineering to throw it away. It seems strange to me that the tolerance is that tight. The 944 crank has a tolerance of 0.0031" / 0.08mm. The 2JZ has a tolerance of 0.0024"

Have you measured the runout?
What tolerance did you use for the bearing clearances?

If I were you I'd have both cranks checked before continuing with the build. Also the carrier bearing saddles should be checked, just to be sure.
__________________
1990 944 Turbo
2007 Renault Clio RS 197 (Sold)
1998 Boxster 2.5L Track Day/ Race Car
2011 Mistubishi i-MiEV
Norway
Bebbetufs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2024, 01:59 PM   #7
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: It's a kind of magic.....
Posts: 6,482
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bebbetufs View Post
Some people claim these cranks can't be ground because the hardened layer is too thin. Did the machinist test the hardness of the reground rod pin?

I just measured my own crank and found 0.0012" / 0.03mm runout. I was told by LN engineering to throw it away. It seems strange to me that the tolerance is that tight. The 944 crank has a tolerance of 0.0031" / 0.08mm. The 2JZ has a tolerance of 0.0024"

Have you measured the runout?
What tolerance did you use for the bearing clearances?

If I were you I'd have both cranks checked before continuing with the build. Also the carrier bearing saddles should be checked, just to be sure.
LN is correct.
__________________
Anything really new is invented only in one’s youth. Later, one becomes more experienced, more famous – and more stupid.” - Albert Einstein
JFP in PA is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2024, 02:11 PM   #8
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Norway
Posts: 198
Thanks for your input.
What do you consider acceptable in your builds?
__________________
1990 944 Turbo
2007 Renault Clio RS 197 (Sold)
1998 Boxster 2.5L Track Day/ Race Car
2011 Mistubishi i-MiEV
Norway
Bebbetufs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2024, 03:04 PM   #9
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: It's a kind of magic.....
Posts: 6,482
Let's just say much tighter than those values. And before you ask more, you are in an area of very limited information that is very dear to come by as Porsche has never published it.
__________________
Anything really new is invented only in one’s youth. Later, one becomes more experienced, more famous – and more stupid.” - Albert Einstein
JFP in PA is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2024, 09:35 PM   #10
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: North Cali
Posts: 816
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bebbetufs View Post
Some people claim these cranks can't be ground because the hardened layer is too thin. Did the machinist test the hardness of the reground rod pin?
Where did he mention reground pin? I think he just got the crank polished.
Homeoboxter is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2024, 12:27 AM   #11
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Norway
Posts: 198
Quote:
Originally Posted by Homeoboxter View Post
Where did he mention reground pin? I think he just got the crank polished.
My bad. I assumed a thrashed pin would equal grinding.
__________________
1990 944 Turbo
2007 Renault Clio RS 197 (Sold)
1998 Boxster 2.5L Track Day/ Race Car
2011 Mistubishi i-MiEV
Norway
Bebbetufs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2024, 12:39 AM   #12
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Norway
Posts: 198
Quote:
Originally Posted by JFP in PA View Post
Let's just say much tighter than those values. And before you ask more, you are in an area of very limited information that is very dear to come by as Porsche has never published it.
Thanks for responding.

Yes, I have found that people won't share info about this particular engine. For other cars I work on people share willingly and freely what they have
__________________
1990 944 Turbo
2007 Renault Clio RS 197 (Sold)
1998 Boxster 2.5L Track Day/ Race Car
2011 Mistubishi i-MiEV
Norway
Bebbetufs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2024, 05:49 AM   #13
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: NJ
Posts: 144
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bebbetufs View Post
Thanks for responding.

Yes, I have found that people won't share info about this particular engine. For other cars I work on people share willingly and freely what they have
Perhaps this point has escaped you - people can’t share what they don’t have. The root cause of that is an organization headquartered in the same time zone you are.
tcoradeschi is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2024, 07:44 AM   #14
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Norway
Posts: 198
Quote:
Originally Posted by tcoradeschi View Post
Perhaps this point has escaped you - people can’t share what they don’t have. The root cause of that is an organization headquartered in the same time zone you are.
Perhaps.English is not my first language It is also possible people have workable information, but don't want to share. which was how I read, and still read the response.

I'm sorry if I came across as rude. I understand why people won't want to be associated with unofficial values, even though they are proven to work. I should have directed my frustration at the organisation you mention.

OP, sorry for hijacking your thread. I hope your build goes well.

__________________
1990 944 Turbo
2007 Renault Clio RS 197 (Sold)
1998 Boxster 2.5L Track Day/ Race Car
2011 Mistubishi i-MiEV
Norway
Bebbetufs is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page