05-18-2007, 10:34 AM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NYC area
Posts: 681
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by porsche986spyder
Porsche has an answer, it's called the "S" type! The Boxster S has a 3.2L. Does that answer you question? 
|
Hey, genius, the Boxster S has a 3.4l while the non-S maintains its 2.7l.
Nice try, though.
__________________
Miss my Boxster
|
|
|
05-18-2007, 10:38 AM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,311
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bavarian Motorist
Hey, genius, the Boxster S has a 3.4l while the non-S maintains its 2.7l.
Nice try, though. 
|
Yes, but you responded to quick. I fixed my statement. 3.2 for 01-04! Genius! 3.4 for 05 and up.
Last edited by porsche986spyder; 05-18-2007 at 10:40 AM.
|
|
|
05-18-2007, 10:43 AM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NYC area
Posts: 681
|
Your statement is still wrong. The 3.4l is new for '07
That's part of my point. They increased displacement on the S and only added a few HP to the same 2.7l.
The other part is that, independent of the high-end version, the base Boxster still trails its class in this category despite being as pricey.
Now it still leads its class in other departments (minus a Lotus elise) but a little bump in displacement might be useful?
Or what about a detuned version of the 3.2l? Shrug.
__________________
Miss my Boxster
|
|
|
05-18-2007, 10:47 AM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,311
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bavarian Motorist
Your statement is still wrong. The 3.4l is new for '07
That's part of my point. They increased displacement on the S and only added a few HP to the same 2.7l.
The other part is that, independent of the high-end version, the base Boxster still trails its class in this category despite being as pricey.
Now it still leads its class in other departments (minus a Lotus elise) but a little bump in displacement might be useful?
Or what about a detuned version of the 3.2l? Shrug.
|
I'm just being sarcastic. I did say "AND UP" meaning 07.
|
|
|
05-18-2007, 10:53 AM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,311
|
I feel your pain. I too wish I had bought the "S" type for the added HP. Even though my year 01, 2.7 still has even less HP than the newer 05 and up base model, I would be happy with it. You have more HP than my car.
|
|
|
05-18-2007, 11:12 AM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 874
|
I think the problem with your statement is that you're not correctly identifying the competition.
The base 987 2.7 with 245 hp goes up against:
SLK280 - 228 hp
BMW Z4 3.0 - 215 hp
Audi TT 2.0 - 200hp
Honda S2000 -237hp
Yes, it's the most expensive, but it's also got the most horses.
The Boxster S goes up against:
SLK350 - 268hp
Z4 3.0 SI (255hp)
Audi TT 3.2 - 250hp
Nissan 350Z 306hp
Once again, the most expensive but with 295 hp, more than competitive.
The Boxster S also is forced to go up agains the super variants and while short on power, still more than holds it's own in performance. Porsche obvioulsy doesn't make a third variant of the Boxster, because it doesn't need to (read previous sentence).
AMGSLK55 - 355hp
Z4M - 330hp
Basically, while the competition (in some cases) covers the full roadster spectrum with three variants, Porsche does it with two, which kind of puts their models in between the slots created by the competition. I'd love to see a super variant on the Boxster, as would we all, but alas....
__________________
http://i7.tinypic.com/24ovngk.jpghttp://i7.tinypic.com/24ow0id.jpg
06 987S- Sold
Carrara White / Black / Black/Stone Grey Two-tone
05 987 5-speed - Sold
Midnight Blue Metallic / Metropol Blue / Sand Beige
06 MB SLK350- Lease escapee
Iridium Silver Metallic / Black
We've heard that a million monkeys at a million keyboards could produce the complete works of Shakespeare; now, thanks to the Internet, we know that is not true. - Robert Wilensky
|
|
|
05-20-2007, 05:16 AM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NYC area
Posts: 681
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SD987
I think the problem with your statement is that you're not correctly identifying the competition.
The base 987 2.7 with 245 hp goes up against:
SLK280 - 228 hp
BMW Z4 3.0 - 215 hp
Audi TT 2.0 - 200hp
Honda S2000 -237hp
Yes, it's the most expensive, but it's also got the most horses.
The Boxster S goes up against:
SLK350 - 268hp
Z4 3.0 SI (255hp)
Audi TT 3.2 - 250hp
Nissan 350Z 306hp
Once again, the most expensive but with 295 hp, more than competitive.
The Boxster S also is forced to go up agains the super variants and while short on power, still more than holds it's own in performance. Porsche obvioulsy doesn't make a third variant of the Boxster, because it doesn't need to (read previous sentence).
AMGSLK55 - 355hp
Z4M - 330hp
Basically, while the competition (in some cases) covers the full roadster spectrum with three variants, Porsche does it with two, which kind of puts their models in between the slots created by the competition. I'd love to see a super variant on the Boxster, as would we all, but alas....
|
I disagree here. Just because the Boxster "corresponds" to those models does not mean it is the direct competitor to them.
In reality, the base Boxster will be competing with the Z4 si ($42,000) and the SLK350 ($48,000) while the SLK280 and Z4 are in a slightly lower class.
They have more variants, but the Boxster doesn't come in until the "second variant" merely due to price similarities. That's what matters to consumers, after all.
The Boxster S would compete with the likes of the M roadster and SLK55. It does this well, despite having less horses, it's more car than both (and that's saying a lot because the M roadster is a hell a of a lot of car)
If you look at comparison tests, it's usually between an M roadster or M coupe and Boxster/Cayman S.
That's what I think anyhow.
Thanks for the answers, everyone.
__________________
Miss my Boxster
|
|
|
05-18-2007, 06:23 PM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Huntington, NY
Posts: 409
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bavarian Motorist
Hey, genius, the Boxster S has a 3.4l while the non-S maintains its 2.7l.
Nice try, though. 
|
That's news to me. My 2000 Boxster S has a 3.2L M96.21 engine. The 2000 - 2004 Boxster S has the 3.2L
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:04 AM.
| |