Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Boxster General Discussions

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-07-2015, 11:08 AM   #1
Registered User
 
Luv2Box's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Pacific Grove, CA
Posts: 494
Garage
When I fill the tank with Chevron my OBC reads 340 miles for the tank and when I fill with Shell it reads 299 miles for the tank. The reading is taken right after the fill sitting still. Any thoughts on what causes this?
Luv2Box is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2015, 11:45 AM   #2
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 524
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luv2Box View Post
When I fill the tank with Chevron my OBC reads 340 miles for the tank and when I fill with Shell it reads 299 miles for the tank. The reading is taken right after the fill sitting still. Any thoughts on what causes this?
Did you check to make sure conditions are the same? Your current average mpg when filling the tank.
__________________
2008 Boxster S PDE2
02 Boxster S Blk on Blk(Stock for the Wife)
88 turbo S (My Toy) slightly modified
cas951 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2015, 01:26 PM   #3
Registered User
 
Luv2Box's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Pacific Grove, CA
Posts: 494
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by cas951 View Post
Did you check to make sure conditions are the same? Your current average mpg when filling the tank.
Yes conditions appear to be the same the fuel gauge needle is right on the full mark. For some reason the OBC is indicating I will get more miles on a tank of Chevron than a tank of Shell.
Luv2Box is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2015, 02:34 PM   #4
Registered User
 
BYprodriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: O.C. CA
Posts: 3,709
Garage
While I worked at both Shelby & Saleen during the EPA emissions certification process for new manufactured vehicles, 2 different emissions certification engineers were adamant about using nothing but Chevron Supreme in test cars. That's all I use & it's usually the most expensive option. I just paid $4.12 per gal at my local station.
__________________
OE engine rebuilt,3.6 litre LN Engineering billet sleeves,triple row IMSB,LN rods. Deep sump oil pan with DT40 oil.
BYprodriver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2015, 09:07 PM   #5
Registered User
 
Porsche9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 1,796
Quote:
Originally Posted by BYprodriver View Post
I just paid $4.12 per gal at my local station.
$4.12 per gallon! What's in that gas that it's $4.12 a gallon? The Chevron by my house is $2.83 for super.
__________________
03 Carrera
02 Boxster S Guards Red, black interior with matching hardtop
89 Carrera 4
89 944 S2
78 911SC
Porsche9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2015, 04:44 AM   #6
Yeah, I've done that.
 
leftfield6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 91
Garage
To the original poster's question, though, one tankful is not near enough of a sample size to determine any changes in fuel economy. To accurately gauge fuel economy, you need a large sample size.

For the argument about one brand of gas is better than another, I give you this.
__________________
1999 Boxster, Tiptronic, Hard Top, Arctic Silver with Boxster Red Interior
leftfield6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page