Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Boxster General Discussions

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-22-2015, 01:56 PM   #1
Registered User
 
Giller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Listowel, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,120
Best year?

Lots of changes over the years from 97 - 04, what are the pros/cons of the different years and what would people say is the "best" model year?

__________________
2011 Boxster 987.2 Arctic silver / Black leather, PDK with Sports Chrono Package Plus
Giller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2015, 01:58 PM   #2
Registered User
 
steved0x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: FL
Posts: 4,143
I like 2000 S, bigger engine, improvements over 97-99, dual row ims. Also because that is the one I have I really want a 2004 Anniversary edition, if I had gotten that, then it would be the best
steved0x is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2015, 03:52 PM   #3
X GI
 
SJEFFB986's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Pa
Posts: 80
I like my 99

97-99 is pure, raw, no frills boxster (base model). And they have the dual row ims which was more robust than years 2000-2005. My 99 loves to rev and be tossed around. 125k plus miles and no problem. Original IMS. 2000-2005 boxsters went to the smaller single row IMS and these are more prone to failure. Research online. Best years are 2007-2008. Less IMS failures. Of course 2009 and up they eliminated the IMS all together.
__________________
Daily Drivers:
2013 Passat SE
2001 RX300
1999 Boxster
SJEFFB986 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2015, 03:57 PM   #4
Rennzenn
 
j.fro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,369
Garage
Not patial or anything...
2000
Dual row IMS. Digi speedo in center. Cable hood and trunk. 18" wheels OK. 3.2 + light weight. Fewer electronic driver nannies. Right spot in depreciation curve.
__________________
Rennzenn
Jfro@rennzenn.com
j.fro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2015, 04:06 PM   #5
Custom User Title Here
 
particlewave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ft. Leonard Wood
Posts: 6,163
Garage
This should be fun.

particlewave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2015, 04:08 PM   #6
Registered User
 
steved0x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: FL
Posts: 4,143
Quote:
Originally Posted by j.fro View Post
Not patial or anything...
2000
Dual row IMS. Digi speedo in center. Cable hood and trunk. 18" wheels OK. 3.2 + light weight. Fewer electronic driver nannies. Right spot in depreciation curve.
I forgot about those, speedo in the center really like.
steved0x is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2015, 04:11 PM   #7
Beginner
 
Jamesp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,659
Garage
2003 S - updated engine, great 0 - 60 time, and I own one.
__________________
2003 S manual
Jamesp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2015, 04:27 PM   #8
Registered User
 
golonaus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: chi-town
Posts: 328
Garage
99
last of raw boxters.
__________________
99' with 3.4l engine. ROW tune. SAI delete
golonaus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2015, 04:31 PM   #9
Registered User
 
BIGJake111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Greenville, S.C.
Posts: 2,670
Garage
Best year?

Has to be something without a glove box. It'd be hard for me to decide between a 2.5 or a 2000 S. The S gets bigger wheels and is usually optioned more to the spec that a boxster deserves to be with aluminum and such but is E-Gas. But speedo belongs in the center and there shouldn't be a glove box. As long as those are checked and the car has a dual row ims it's a go for me.

After that it's just if you want the S with larger wheels and a more highway grunt, or a 2.5 for a more Miata, loves to rev, toss around. Only thing these cars need is the glass top of the later cars.
BIGJake111 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2015, 04:38 PM   #10
Custom User Title Here
 
particlewave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ft. Leonard Wood
Posts: 6,163
Garage
18's were an option on base models from '98 up.

Of course, my vote is '99
Dual row IMS, center speedo, 18" wheels, upgraded chassis structure, no e-gas, better looking top (no center bow), excellent gas mileage, decent power, and raw feel.

Last edited by particlewave; 03-22-2015 at 04:43 PM.
particlewave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2015, 04:45 PM   #11
Certified Boxster Addict
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,669
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jamesp View Post
2003 S - updated engine, great 0 - 60 time, and I own one.
+1. If I didn't have to use an early 2.5L for racing, I'd want a 2003 S.
__________________
1999 996 C2 - sold - bought back - sold for more
1997 Spec Boxster BSR #254
1979 911 SC
POC Licensed DE/TT Instructor
thstone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2015, 05:28 PM   #12
Registered User
 
Joe B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Jackson Hole, Wyoming
Posts: 800
Quote:
Originally Posted by BIGJake111 View Post
Has to be something without a glove box.
What exactly is wrong with a glove compartment? How about a reason to support your wise pronouncement ? My 2003 S (the best year by far) has one and I like it. I suppose you don't like cruise control either .
Joe B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2015, 05:56 PM   #13
Need For Speed
 
KRAM36's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Funville
Posts: 2,112
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by j.fro View Post
Not patial or anything...
2000
Dual row IMS. Digi speedo in center. Cable hood and trunk. 18" wheels OK. 3.2 + light weight. Fewer electronic driver nannies. Right spot in depreciation curve.
I have a 2003 S. I wish it had the digi speedo in the center (looking at a HUD to fix this) and the dual row IMS. However the changes made to the oil protection tubes as a component part of the valve lifter housing and sealed to the cylinder head cover with formed oil seal rings made to the 2003+ models is a big plus to me.

With the cluster change I'm told the digital part is more reliable. The 2003+ models have a glass rear window with defroster. My car has no electronic driver nannies either, except ABS. 2003+ models Porsche also got rid of the amber in the front and rear lights, which looks much better to me personally.

In my book the 2003+ models is where Porsche stepped up the 986 game.


.
__________________
2003 Boxster S
| 987 Air Box | K&N Air Filter | 76mm Intake Pipe| 996 76mm TB | 997 Distribution T | Secondary Cat Delete Pipes | Borla Muffler | NHP 200 Cell Exhaust Headers |

Last edited by KRAM36; 03-22-2015 at 06:51 PM.
KRAM36 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2015, 06:26 PM   #14
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: St Pete
Posts: 22
99 would get my vote. But I'm a little bias
__________________
1999 Boxster Base // Arctic Silver // 5-Speed
ryoder986 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2015, 06:48 PM   #15
Registered User
 
Fintro11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Nanaimo, Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 900
03 or 04 for 986

Last years of production are always the best
Fintro11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2015, 07:02 PM   #16
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: S.California
Posts: 2,027
This may give a different perspective. For the same money as an M96 , I would prefer a well repaired 'salvage' later model.YEMV.
http://rennlist.com/forums/997-forum/544270-996-vs-997-but-then-which-997-a.html

Last edited by Gelbster; 03-22-2015 at 07:09 PM.
Gelbster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2015, 12:18 AM   #17
Need For Speed
 
KRAM36's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Funville
Posts: 2,112
Garage
I like the 986 body style. If mine got totaled I would get another one.
__________________
2003 Boxster S
| 987 Air Box | K&N Air Filter | 76mm Intake Pipe| 996 76mm TB | 997 Distribution T | Secondary Cat Delete Pipes | Borla Muffler | NHP 200 Cell Exhaust Headers |
KRAM36 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2015, 03:49 AM   #18
Registered User
 
kk2002s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: S. New Jersey
Posts: 1,239
Garage
Kind of thread I like - No Bias
Digital Speedo in the middle - Nice idea except you need to look at the GPS if you want to know how fast you're actually going
02 S has computer display in the middle so that is much more useful - at least to me
Probably 02 S is the worst - Of course - That is what I have
__________________
2002 S - old school third pedal
Seal Grey
kk2002s is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2015, 04:07 AM   #19
Registered User
 
RedTele58's Avatar
Well - I own 3 '99's, a 2000 base, a 2001S and a 2002S.

I guess the '99's get my vote by pure strength of numbers. The S model cars only come out on occasion. I drive one of the '99's almost every day.
__________________
I think I have a Porsche problem...
RedTele58 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2015, 04:46 AM   #20
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Oshawa
Posts: 96
I'm voting for my 97 Base, Have only had it short time. But, seems very robust. 90K on it.

__________________
1997 Boxster! (Tiptronic)
brjak is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page