03-22-2015, 01:56 PM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Listowel, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,120
|
Best year?
Lots of changes over the years from 97 - 04, what are the pros/cons of the different years and what would people say is the "best" model year?
__________________
2011 Boxster 987.2 Arctic silver / Black leather, PDK with Sports Chrono Package Plus
|
|
|
03-22-2015, 01:58 PM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: FL
Posts: 4,144
|
I like 2000 S, bigger engine, improvements over 97-99, dual row ims. Also because that is the one I have  I really want a 2004 Anniversary edition, if I had gotten that, then it would be the best
|
|
|
03-22-2015, 03:52 PM
|
#3
|
X GI
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Pa
Posts: 80
|
I like my 99
97-99 is pure, raw, no frills boxster (base model). And they have the dual row ims which was more robust than years 2000-2005. My 99 loves to rev and be tossed around. 125k plus miles and no problem. Original IMS. 2000-2005 boxsters went to the smaller single row IMS and these are more prone to failure. Research online. Best years are 2007-2008. Less IMS failures. Of course 2009 and up they eliminated the IMS all together.
__________________
Daily Drivers:
2013 Passat SE
2001 RX300
1999 Boxster
|
|
|
03-22-2015, 03:57 PM
|
#4
|
Rennzenn
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,369
|
Not patial or anything...
2000
Dual row IMS. Digi speedo in center. Cable hood and trunk. 18" wheels OK. 3.2 + light weight. Fewer electronic driver nannies. Right spot in depreciation curve.
__________________
Rennzenn
Jfro@rennzenn.com
|
|
|
03-22-2015, 04:06 PM
|
#5
|
Custom User Title Here
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ft. Leonard Wood
Posts: 6,164
|
This should be fun.
|
|
|
03-22-2015, 04:08 PM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: FL
Posts: 4,144
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by j.fro
Not patial or anything...
2000
Dual row IMS. Digi speedo in center. Cable hood and trunk. 18" wheels OK. 3.2 + light weight. Fewer electronic driver nannies. Right spot in depreciation curve.
|
I forgot about those, speedo in the center really like.
|
|
|
03-22-2015, 04:11 PM
|
#7
|
Beginner
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,659
|
2003 S - updated engine, great 0 - 60 time, and I own one.
__________________
2003 S manual
|
|
|
03-22-2015, 04:27 PM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: chi-town
Posts: 328
|
99
last of raw boxters.
__________________
99' with 3.4l engine. ROW tune. SAI delete
|
|
|
03-22-2015, 04:31 PM
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Greenville, S.C.
Posts: 2,670
|
Best year?
Has to be something without a glove box. It'd be hard for me to decide between a 2.5 or a 2000 S. The S gets bigger wheels and is usually optioned more to the spec that a boxster deserves to be with aluminum and such but is E-Gas. But speedo belongs in the center and there shouldn't be a glove box. As long as those are checked and the car has a dual row ims it's a go for me.
After that it's just if you want the S with larger wheels and a more highway grunt, or a 2.5 for a more Miata, loves to rev, toss around. Only thing these cars need is the glass top of the later cars.
|
|
|
03-22-2015, 04:38 PM
|
#10
|
Custom User Title Here
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ft. Leonard Wood
Posts: 6,164
|
18's were an option on base models from '98 up.
Of course, my vote is '99 
Dual row IMS, center speedo, 18" wheels, upgraded chassis structure, no e-gas, better looking top (no center bow), excellent gas mileage, decent power, and raw feel.
Last edited by particlewave; 03-22-2015 at 04:43 PM.
|
|
|
03-22-2015, 04:45 PM
|
#11
|
Certified Boxster Addict
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,669
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jamesp
2003 S - updated engine, great 0 - 60 time, and I own one. 
|
+1. If I didn't have to use an early 2.5L for racing, I'd want a 2003 S.
__________________
1999 996 C2 - sold - bought back - sold for more
1997 Spec Boxster BSR #254
1979 911 SC
POC Licensed DE/TT Instructor
|
|
|
03-22-2015, 05:28 PM
|
#12
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Jackson Hole, Wyoming
Posts: 800
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BIGJake111
Has to be something without a glove box.
|
What exactly is wrong with a glove compartment? How about a reason to support your wise pronouncement  ? My 2003 S (the best year by far) has one and I like it. I suppose you don't like cruise control either  .
|
|
|
03-22-2015, 05:56 PM
|
#13
|
Need For Speed
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Funville
Posts: 2,112
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by j.fro
Not patial or anything...
2000
Dual row IMS. Digi speedo in center. Cable hood and trunk. 18" wheels OK. 3.2 + light weight. Fewer electronic driver nannies. Right spot in depreciation curve.
|
I have a 2003 S. I wish it had the digi speedo in the center (looking at a HUD to fix this) and the dual row IMS. However the changes made to the oil protection tubes as a component part of the valve lifter housing and sealed to the cylinder head cover with formed oil seal rings made to the 2003+ models is a big plus to me.
With the cluster change I'm told the digital part is more reliable. The 2003+ models have a glass rear window with defroster. My car has no electronic driver nannies either, except ABS. 2003+ models Porsche also got rid of the amber in the front and rear lights, which looks much better to me personally.
In my book the 2003+ models is where Porsche stepped up the 986 game.
.
__________________
2003 Boxster S
| 987 Air Box | K&N Air Filter | 76mm Intake Pipe| 996 76mm TB | 997 Distribution T | Secondary Cat Delete Pipes | Borla Muffler | NHP 200 Cell Exhaust Headers |
Last edited by KRAM36; 03-22-2015 at 06:51 PM.
|
|
|
03-22-2015, 06:26 PM
|
#14
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: St Pete
Posts: 22
|
99 would get my vote. But I'm a little bias
__________________
1999 Boxster Base // Arctic Silver // 5-Speed
|
|
|
03-22-2015, 06:48 PM
|
#15
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Nanaimo, Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 906
|
03 or 04 for 986
Last years of production are always the best
|
|
|
03-23-2015, 12:18 AM
|
#17
|
Need For Speed
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Funville
Posts: 2,112
|
I like the 986 body style. If mine got totaled I would get another one.
__________________
2003 Boxster S
| 987 Air Box | K&N Air Filter | 76mm Intake Pipe| 996 76mm TB | 997 Distribution T | Secondary Cat Delete Pipes | Borla Muffler | NHP 200 Cell Exhaust Headers |
|
|
|
03-23-2015, 03:49 AM
|
#18
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: S. New Jersey
Posts: 1,239
|
Kind of thread I like - No Bias 
Digital Speedo in the middle - Nice idea except you need to look at the GPS if you want to know how fast you're actually going
02 S has computer display in the middle so that is much more useful - at least to me
Probably 02 S is the worst - Of course - That is what I have
__________________
2002 S - old school third pedal
Seal Grey
|
|
|
03-23-2015, 04:07 AM
|
#19
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: SW Okla
Posts: 1,115
|
Well - I own 3 '99's, a 2000 base, a 2001S and a 2002S.
I guess the '99's get my vote by pure strength of numbers. The S model cars only come out on occasion. I drive one of the '99's almost every day.
__________________
I think I have a Porsche problem...
|
|
|
03-23-2015, 04:46 AM
|
#20
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Oshawa
Posts: 96
|
I'm voting for my 97 Base, Have only had it short time. But, seems very robust. 90K on it.
__________________
1997 Boxster! (Tiptronic)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:09 PM.
| |