| 
        | 
 
 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-22-2015, 01:56 PM | #1 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Jul 2014 Location: Listowel, Ontario, Canada 
					Posts: 1,120
				      | 
				
				Best year?
			 
 
			Lots of changes over the years from 97 - 04, what are the pros/cons of the different years and what would people say is the "best" model year?
				__________________2011 Boxster 987.2  Arctic silver / Black leather, PDK with Sports Chrono Package Plus
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-22-2015, 01:58 PM | #2 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Dec 2012 Location: FL 
					Posts: 4,144
				      | 
			I like 2000 S, bigger engine, improvements over 97-99, dual row ims. Also because that is the one I have    I really want a 2004 Anniversary edition, if I had gotten that, then it would be the best    |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-22-2015, 03:52 PM | #3 |  
	| X GI 
				 
				Join Date: Nov 2014 Location: Pa 
					Posts: 80
				      | 
				
				I like my 99
			 
 
			97-99 is pure, raw, no frills boxster (base model). And they have the dual row ims which was more robust than years 2000-2005. My 99 loves to rev and be tossed around. 125k plus miles and no problem. Original IMS. 2000-2005 boxsters went to the smaller single row IMS and these are more prone to failure. Research online. Best years are 2007-2008. Less IMS failures. Of course 2009 and up they eliminated the IMS all together.
		 
				__________________Daily Drivers:
 2013 Passat SE
 2001 RX300
 1999 Boxster
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-22-2015, 03:57 PM | #4 |  
	| Rennzenn 
				 
				Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Virginia 
					Posts: 1,369
				      | 
			Not patial or anything...2000
 Dual row IMS. Digi speedo in center. Cable hood and trunk.  18" wheels OK. 3.2 + light weight. Fewer electronic driver nannies. Right spot in depreciation curve.
 
				__________________Rennzenn
 Jfro@rennzenn.com
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-22-2015, 04:06 PM | #5 |  
	| Custom User Title Here 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: Ft. Leonard Wood 
					Posts: 6,167
				      | 
			This should be fun.   |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-22-2015, 04:08 PM | #6 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Dec 2012 Location: FL 
					Posts: 4,144
				      | 
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by j.fro  Not patial or anything...2000
 Dual row IMS. Digi speedo in center. Cable hood and trunk.  18" wheels OK. 3.2 + light weight. Fewer electronic driver nannies. Right spot in depreciation curve.
 |  
I forgot about those, speedo in the center really like.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-22-2015, 04:11 PM | #7 |  
	| Beginner 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2013 Location: Houston 
					Posts: 1,659
				      | 
			2003 S - updated engine, great 0 - 60 time, and I own one.   
				__________________2003 S manual
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-22-2015, 04:27 PM | #8 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Oct 2011 Location: chi-town 
					Posts: 328
				      | 
			99last of raw boxters.
 
				__________________99' with 3.4l engine.  ROW tune. SAI delete
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-22-2015, 04:31 PM | #9 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Dec 2013 Location: Greenville, S.C. 
					Posts: 2,670
				      | 
				
				Best year?
			 
 
			Has to be something without a glove box. It'd be hard for me to decide between a 2.5 or a 2000 S. The S gets bigger wheels and is usually optioned more to the spec that a boxster deserves to be with aluminum and such but is E-Gas. But speedo belongs in the center and there shouldn't be a glove box. As long as those are checked and the car has a dual row ims it's a go for me.
 After that it's just if you want the S with larger wheels and a more highway grunt, or a 2.5 for a more Miata, loves to rev, toss around. Only thing these cars need is the glass top of the later cars.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-22-2015, 04:38 PM | #10 |  
	| Custom User Title Here 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: Ft. Leonard Wood 
					Posts: 6,167
				      | 
			18's were an option on base models from '98 up.    
Of course, my vote is '99   
Dual row IMS, center speedo, 18" wheels, upgraded chassis structure, no e-gas, better looking top (no center bow), excellent gas mileage, decent power, and raw feel.   
				 Last edited by particlewave; 03-22-2015 at 04:43 PM.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-22-2015, 04:45 PM | #11 |  
	| Certified Boxster Addict 
				 
				Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: Los Angeles 
					Posts: 7,669
				      | 
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Jamesp  2003 S - updated engine, great 0 - 60 time, and I own one.   |  
+1. If I didn't have to use an early 2.5L for racing, I'd want a 2003 S.
		 
				__________________1999 996 C2 - sold - bought back - sold for more
 1997 Spec Boxster BSR #254
 1979 911 SC
 POC Licensed DE/TT Instructor
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-22-2015, 05:28 PM | #12 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Dec 2012 Location: Jackson Hole, Wyoming 
					Posts: 800
				      | 
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by BIGJake111  Has to be something without a glove box. |  
What exactly is wrong with a glove compartment? How about a reason to support your wise pronouncement   ? My 2003 S (the best year by far) has one and I like it. I suppose you don't like cruise control either   .
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-22-2015, 05:56 PM | #13 |  
	| Need For Speed 
				 
				Join Date: Feb 2013 Location: Funville 
					Posts: 2,114
				      | 
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by j.fro  Not patial or anything...2000
 Dual row IMS. Digi speedo in center. Cable hood and trunk.  18" wheels OK. 3.2 + light weight. Fewer electronic driver nannies. Right spot in depreciation curve.
 |  
I have a 2003 S. I wish it had the digi speedo in the center (looking at a   HUD  to fix this) and the dual row IMS. However the changes made to the oil protection tubes as a component part of the valve lifter housing and sealed to the cylinder head cover with formed oil seal rings made to the 2003+ models is a big plus to me.
 
With the cluster change I'm told the digital part is more reliable. The 2003+ models have a glass rear window with defroster. My car has no electronic driver nannies either, except ABS. 2003+ models Porsche also got rid of the amber in the front and rear lights, which looks much better to me personally.
 
In my book the 2003+ models is where Porsche stepped up the 986 game.
 
.
		 
				__________________2003 Boxster S
 | 987 Air Box | K&N Air Filter | 76mm Intake Pipe| 996 76mm TB | 997 Distribution T | Secondary Cat Delete Pipes | Borla Muffler | NHP 200 Cell Exhaust Headers |
 
				 Last edited by KRAM36; 03-22-2015 at 06:51 PM.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-22-2015, 06:26 PM | #14 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2015 Location: St Pete 
					Posts: 22
				      | 
			99 would get my vote. But I'm a little bias   
				__________________1999 Boxster Base // Arctic Silver // 5-Speed
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-22-2015, 06:48 PM | #15 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Jun 2013 Location: Nanaimo, Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada 
					Posts: 906
				      | 
			03 or 04 for 986
 Last years of production are always the best
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-23-2015, 12:18 AM | #17 |  
	| Need For Speed 
				 
				Join Date: Feb 2013 Location: Funville 
					Posts: 2,114
				      | 
			I like the 986 body style. If mine got totaled I would get another one.
		 
				__________________2003 Boxster S
 | 987 Air Box | K&N Air Filter | 76mm Intake Pipe| 996 76mm TB | 997 Distribution T | Secondary Cat Delete Pipes | Borla Muffler | NHP 200 Cell Exhaust Headers |
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-23-2015, 03:49 AM | #18 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Sep 2012 Location: S. New Jersey 
					Posts: 1,239
				      | 
			Kind of thread I like - No Bias   
Digital Speedo in the middle - Nice idea except you need to look at the GPS if you want to know how fast you're actually going 
02 S has computer display in the middle so that is much more useful - at least to me 
Probably 02 S is the worst - Of course - That is what I have
		
				__________________2002 S - old school third pedal
 Seal Grey
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-23-2015, 04:07 AM | #19 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Nov 2012 Location: SW Okla 
					Posts: 1,117
				      | 
			Well - I own 3 '99's, a 2000 base, a 2001S and a 2002S.
 I guess the '99's get my vote by pure strength of numbers.  The S model cars only come out on occasion.  I drive one of the '99's almost every day.
 
				__________________I think I have a Porsche problem...
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-23-2015, 04:46 AM | #20 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Oct 2014 Location: Oshawa 
					Posts: 96
				      | 
			I'm voting for my 97 Base, Have only had it short time. But, seems very robust. 90K on it.
		 
 
				__________________1997 Boxster! (Tiptronic)
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
	
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is On 
 |  |  |  All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:18 PM. 
	
	
		
	
	
 |  |