Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Boxster General Discussions

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-16-2012, 10:44 AM   #1
Registered User
 
jaykay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: toronto
Posts: 2,668
Alright a high noon drag race duel at Gimli! With any luck we won't get disturbed by any dead stick 767s

I was actually driving through Radium down into Nelson BC just a while ago...phew what drive still did get me primed enough for the out right speed of track driving the following week

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Radium King View Post
you're right; with a plenum that exits straight out from the intake i'll have to put in a larger radius curve further upstream as the intake runners themselves are canted to the left a bit. i'm just thinking that the further i put that from the 90 degree bend that happens at the actual plenum the better. the thought of the cayman plenum is attractive, however, as the resonsnace flap used on that plenum is now used on the dfi 911's also, so it must work (i think it is a low end/top end compromise, l however). further, as you note, it should be plug and play with a 987 airbox (which is a way better unit that the 986). i have a line on a cayman plenum if you are interested; pm me for details.

regarding the dme adapting to the larger maf housing i agree, BR has gobs more experence than most of the rest of us combined and says it works. he said in a different thread that he's going to try it on one of his cars and see if the air/fuel ratios adapt. i know i have read of people doing 3.4 swaps and not having the maf appropriate to their dme and having problems, so definitive results would be nice. it may be an issue of cumulative change, also; the dme can adapt to the maf change, and the dme can adapt to a higher flow intake, but both a higher flow intake (and exhaust, etc.) combined with the maf change change may exceed the learning capacity of the dme.

i'll tell you what: you do the cayman change, i'll do the 997 change, and we'll meet in the middle and compare (manitoba - geographic centre of canada - gimli motorsports park)!
__________________
986 00S
jaykay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2012, 11:29 AM   #2
Registered User
 
Johnny Danger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,810
Garage
So what's the final verdict ? Is it the cayman or 997 plenum that should be mated to the 76mm throttle body ?
__________________
Don't worry … I've got the microfilm.
Johnny Danger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2012, 10:53 AM   #3
Registered User
 
jaykay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: toronto
Posts: 2,668
Mr. Danger

The face off has not gone down yet! We would need an air lift and snow ploughs!

Hmmm delving into this a bit. It seems the "tune" can be upset with addition/deletion of a distributor flap. The resonance flap us tuned to work with or without. I believe I would need a Caymanesque tune to make use of the sophisticated intake system.
I am not sure about the worth of this and can't do this myself. I think the distributor flap would certainly mitigate any low end losses associated with the larger TB.....just a guess. The engine experts might better answer this

It may be just spy vs spy at Gimli...as I will be likely running a big 3.8 diverter tee.
Shhhh don't tell Trk
__________________
986 00S

Last edited by jaykay; 01-25-2012 at 11:07 AM.
jaykay is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page