03-03-2013, 02:04 PM
|
#1
|
Carnut
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 775
|
Everything works 100% perfectly fine. No problems whatsoever!
Love this mod, I used the 997 TB, bigger is not better in this case.
__________________
'14 Boxster
|
|
|
03-03-2013, 06:02 PM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: So. Cal
Posts: 24
|
AndyA6,
Did you go with TRK's final parts list found on #113 of this thread?
Or did you come up with your own list?
Also, can you verify the opening size of the TB is 74mm?
Thanks for all your help!
|
|
|
03-04-2013, 07:22 AM
|
#3
|
Carnut
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 775
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Speedster986
AndyA6,
Did you go with TRK's final parts list found on #113 of this thread?
Or did you come up with your own list?
Also, can you verify the opening size of the TB is 74mm?
Thanks for all your help!
|
Yes, used that list.
__________________
'14 Boxster
|
|
|
03-03-2013, 02:16 PM
|
#4
|
Carnut
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 775
|
__________________
'14 Boxster
|
|
|
04-09-2013, 01:19 PM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Iceland
Posts: 145
|
I have a G-meter that measures 0-62 mph among other things. It used to give me 5.8 sec average of several runs before mods on my '01 S. I now get 5.2 sec average after modding. From what I have found out on the net this means that my max HP was 250 (figures), and is now 285.
My mods are Fabspeed catless headers, 997 plenum, 74 mm TB, and desnorked.
So I am really happy and I have this thread and all the fine members of this forum to thank...
Last edited by Bfan; 04-09-2013 at 05:40 PM.
|
|
|
04-09-2013, 04:29 PM
|
#6
|
Carnut
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 775
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bfan
I have a G-meter that measures 0-62 mph among other things. It used to give me 5.8 sec average of several runs before mods on my '01 S. I now get 5.2 sec average after modding. From what I have found out on the net this means that my max HP was 250 (figures), and is now 285.
My mods are Fabspeed catless headers, 997 plenum, 74 mm TB, and desnorkel.
So I am really happy and I have this thread and all the fine members of this forum to thank...
|
Very nice! Thank you for your feedback.
Again, mine is running perfectly ok as well.
__________________
'14 Boxster
|
|
|
04-09-2013, 04:33 PM
|
#7
|
Homeboy981
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Sherman, TX
Posts: 663
|
Here's a pic or two. Will have to compile parts list.
You start with a HUGE CONICAL filter…(this was Stage1-notice MAF is by the filter)
Then move the MAF so that it is practically sitting on the Throttle Body (Stage2) - using the Honeycomb to straighten the airflow before the MAF & TB.
It is 4" until it drops to 3.5" at TB.
Enjoy! I sure am!
__________________
2002 Porsche Boxtser S - Silver & Chrome - Died from IMS failure AFTER IMS was replaced!
|
|
|
04-09-2013, 04:59 PM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,150
|
homeboy - do you have that filter enclosed yet? otherwise it's drawing hot air from the engine compartment. I did a quick search and here's some math for you:
http://www.mazda3club.com/showthread.php?t=18386
|
|
|
04-12-2013, 08:19 AM
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,150
|
cool with the half second increase in zero to 60 times. also like the idea of filing the TB; the 1/8" lip on that thing always seemed wrong to me.
|
|
|
04-12-2013, 05:37 PM
|
#10
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 633
|
Can I ask what are you guys using to connect the intake to the TB? Is there a better option than the flexible hose? I found one on eBay but the guy wants like $250 for a piece of plastic.
__________________
LB/GG/MB 02 2.7 sold
MB/GG 02 996TT
|
|
|
04-13-2013, 07:16 AM
|
#11
|
Homeboy981
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Sherman, TX
Posts: 663
|
Here is how close my MAF is to the Throttle Body…
Using the Honeycomb filter to straighten the airflow prior to hitting the MAF.
Here is a shot of that:
@TRK - you got me! No cold air…yet! I have a couple prototypes, like this one….
Trying to take advantage of the conical shape of the filter.. May have to use a box…the cone thing isn't working. The open end of the cone presses against the firewall for a "sealed" fit.
Here's another view of the HUGE cone intake (HINT: It barely clears the engine bay getting it in)…
Another view standing up….
From the inside...
It still has to be painted, but the design is not perfected….I may regret this but…any suggestions?
__________________
2002 Porsche Boxtser S - Silver & Chrome - Died from IMS failure AFTER IMS was replaced!
|
|
|
04-14-2013, 05:45 AM
|
#12
|
Homeboy981
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Sherman, TX
Posts: 663
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ckrikos
Can I ask what are you guys using to connect the intake to the TB? Is there a better option than the flexible hose? I found one on eBay but the guy wants like $250 for a piece of plastic.
|
Siliconintakes.com has them in a bunch of sizes and flavors. Don't buy that thing on ebay…I have seen it - you CAN DO better.
__________________
2002 Porsche Boxtser S - Silver & Chrome - Died from IMS failure AFTER IMS was replaced!
|
|
|
04-14-2013, 08:17 AM
|
#13
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,150
|
crikos - I bought a 3.25" to 3" reducing 90 degee elbow. 3.25" over the tb and reduces to 3" at the bend. this allows a fit to the 3" maf housing (or whatever combo of 3" couplers and joiners you use to get to the maf housing); it also provides more clearance from the back of the engine bay.
homeboy - pretty tight in there, huh? i'm currently using the larger of the bmc air boxes with a 3.25" filter. even that doesn't fit well. I bet 4" is tight. one thing that will gain you some room is to remove the insulation on the inside of the engine bay on that side - should buy you 1/2" or so.
another option might be to not mount the filter in parallel with the engine, but rather have the piping do a 90 degree turn into the actual side intake and mount the filter element in the fender well. they are doing this on caymans with a kit from fabspeed:
BGB / Fabspeed Cold Air Intake Install (with Pics) -
you would still probably have to go with a smaller filter, however; I think there would be room in the fender well, but the opening into the engine bay is only *i think* around 3.5".
otherwise, i think you could diy something similar very easy: remove the rubber liner in the fender well, trace the inside flange onto a piece of lexan, drill a 4" (or whatever) hole in it, bolt it in place, mount the air filter through the hole and connect the piping.
|
|
|
04-17-2013, 04:46 AM
|
#14
|
Homeboy981
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Sherman, TX
Posts: 663
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Radium King
homeboy - pretty tight in there, huh? I bet 4" is tight. one thing that will gain you some room is to remove the insulation on the inside of the engine bay on that side - should buy you 1/2" or so.
another option might be to not mount the filter in parallel with the engine, but rather have the piping do a 90 degree turn into the actual side intake and mount the filter element in the fender well. they are doing this on caymans with a kit from fabspeed:
otherwise, i think you could diy something similar very easy: remove the rubber liner in the fender well, trace the inside flange onto a piece of lexan, drill a 4" (or whatever) hole in it, bolt it in place, mount the air filter through the hole and connect the piping.
|
TRK,
4" is VERY TIGHT! In fact, I hate taking it apart because my hands get mangled! I have not resorted to removing the insulation. However, the insulation does deform a little where the intake resides against it.
One of our members has a design that "turns" into the hole in the side of our car....but he said it came at a cost. He had to 'hollow out' part of the passenger area and the noise came in too. Besides, making that 90 degree turn would certainly cause more air turbulence and reduce the overall airflow somewhat...but it would be a 100% Cold Air Intake.
I thought of Lexan too, but the engines temps preclude me from using it. It is just too hot in the engine compartment. I have a bunch of Lexan, plex, etc. laying around from designing Hydrogen units but the temps would be too high for that application. Nothing would be worse than running a day at the track and finding a melted mess of plastic in the engine bay!
Also, I am trying to select a material that can be molded or can be used without square edges - so as not to disrupt the airflow coming in. I have a metal "square box" but am just not happy with how it is finished out....but I guess it IS BETTER than nothing! Especially, based on your calculations, that I am Losing HP running warmer air.
Where did that Cold Air Filter box come from? Was it customer-made? Out of what?
__________________
2002 Porsche Boxtser S - Silver & Chrome - Died from IMS failure AFTER IMS was replaced!
|
|
|
04-17-2013, 07:44 AM
|
#15
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: mass
Posts: 731
|
look into making a mold of your air box out sheet foam and clay . then you can make a mold out of that . epoxy resin and glass mat would be a good choice of materials.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Homeboy981
TRK,
4" is VERY TIGHT! In fact, I hate taking it apart because my hands get mangled! I have not resorted to removing the insulation. However, the insulation does deform a little where the intake resides against it.
One of our members has a design that "turns" into the hole in the side of our car....but he said it came at a cost. He had to 'hollow out' part of the passenger area and the noise came in too. Besides, making that 90 degree turn would certainly cause more air turbulence and reduce the overall airflow somewhat...but it would be a 100% Cold Air Intake.
I thought of Lexan too, but the engines temps preclude me from using it. It is just too hot in the engine compartment. I have a bunch of Lexan, plex, etc. laying around from designing Hydrogen units but the temps would be too high for that application. Nothing would be worse than running a day at the track and finding a melted mess of plastic in the engine bay!
Also, I am trying to select a material that can be molded or can be used without square edges - so as not to disrupt the airflow coming in. I have a metal "square box" but am just not happy with how it is finished out....but I guess it IS BETTER than nothing! Especially, based on your calculations, that I am Losing HP running warmer air.
Where did that Cold Air Filter box come from? Was it customer-made? Out of what?
|
|
|
|
04-15-2013, 03:43 AM
|
#16
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 275
|
Where did this filter box come from?
|
|
|
04-15-2013, 04:47 AM
|
#17
|
Homeboy981
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Sherman, TX
Posts: 663
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wret
Where did this filter box come from?
|
Nice! But I would move that MAF closer to the TB….you will be impressed by the better readings. I thought is was hooey at first, but cannot deny the results now!
Also, that is a small filter and it does not have a filter element in the FRONT of the the filter…that is what I was looking for. I just got a JUMBO sized filter - maybe a little too big but I live in Texas, so it is expected!
__________________
2002 Porsche Boxtser S - Silver & Chrome - Died from IMS failure AFTER IMS was replaced!
|
|
|
04-15-2013, 05:00 AM
|
#18
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: mass
Posts: 731
|
real nice set up here .
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wret
Where did this filter box come from?

|
|
|
|
04-18-2013, 09:13 AM
|
#20
|
Opposed to Subie Burble
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Central CT
Posts: 1,197
|
BYProvider, since no one seems to want to answer you, I think I may try. That airbox seems to be the one that comes with something like the few CAIs made for the Boxster. It may very well not be, but that's the first thing that comes to mind for me. Hopefully whoever posted the picture will divulge their source if it isn't a custom part.
__________________
-O/D
1997 Arctic Silver Boxster, 5-spd
IMSR + RMS
Robbins glass window top
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:20 PM.
| |