Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Performance and Technical Chat

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-21-2014, 05:32 AM   #1
Registered User
 
Allen K. Littlefield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: New Paltz, NY 12561
Posts: 935
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jager View Post
No failure, just did not feel as smooth as a new bearing. I had the transmission down doing a clutch replacement and decided to check the bearing. Turned it with my fingers and it didn't feel silky smooth (as a new one), so I replaced it.

Also note that I have a single row bearing.
Thanks for the reply. I am going to replace with the double row in my '02 single row.


AKL
__________________
'02, Arctic Silver/Graphite Gray, 2.7, TIP, 2nd cat delete, Charlie Chan muffler,de-ambered, Braille Battery, clear tailights, painted bumperettes, clear third brake light, M030 sway bars, F shock tower braces, clear rear deck, '03 side vents. 15mm spacers fore & aft.
Allen K. Littlefield is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2014, 05:49 AM   #2
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,746
When I performed the install several years back Jake told me to place the sticker on the inside of the driver's door jamb just above the striker bar.

coreseller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2014, 06:17 PM   #3
Engine Surgeon
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland GA USA
Posts: 2,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by coreseller View Post
When I performed the install several years back Jake told me to place the sticker on the inside of the driver's door jamb just above the striker bar.


That one was a long time ago, back when we sold IMS bearing kits to the public, not just installing them.

As far as keeping your old bearing:
Doing this means you have no warranty. The reason the old bearing is to be returned is so it can be inspected and entered into a data base reflecting the IMSR serial # that you were issued. This is so LN can ensure that your old bearing was not failing, because if it was, your retrofit bearing will also likely fail, unless extreme measures are taken.
__________________
Jake Raby/www.flat6innovations.com
IMS Solution/ Faultless Tool Inventor
US Patent 8,992,089 &
US Patent 9,416,697
Developer of The IMS Retrofit Procedure- M96/ M97 Specialist
Jake Raby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2014, 08:00 PM   #4
Registered User
 
jaykay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: toronto
Posts: 2,668
I did mine in the early days; not sure there was a sticker.....believe it or not dual rows were not good as there was no extraction method!! I don't have a sticker and didn't return the bearing!! This must have program put in place later?

I can remember experienced porsche service personnel saying "don't worry about it unless you are super aggressive with it".
__________________
986 00S
jaykay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2014, 07:07 AM   #5
Engine Surgeon
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland GA USA
Posts: 2,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaykay View Post
I did mine in the early days; not sure there was a sticker.....believe it or not dual rows were not good as there was no extraction method!! I don't have a sticker and didn't return the bearing!! This must have program put in place later?
There has always been an extraction method. I released the extraction procedure BEFORE the very first IMSR kit was sold.

The bearing return policy has always been the same, its part of the return policy and has been since day #1.

Quote:
I can remember experienced porsche service personnel saying "don't worry about it unless you are super aggressive with it".
Yeah, thats back when I was told that the bearing was impossible to extract, and that it wasn't serviceable and that I was lying when I said I had developed the extractor and retrofit procedure.

Yes, those were the days...
__________________
Jake Raby/www.flat6innovations.com
IMS Solution/ Faultless Tool Inventor
US Patent 8,992,089 &
US Patent 9,416,697
Developer of The IMS Retrofit Procedure- M96/ M97 Specialist
Jake Raby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2014, 08:21 AM   #6
Registered User
 
jaykay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: toronto
Posts: 2,668
I was speaking of dual row versus single row extraction. Early on, according my information, there wasn't a known extraction method for the dual. Yes of course there was no kit yet either
__________________
986 00S

Last edited by jaykay; 10-31-2014 at 08:24 AM.
jaykay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2014, 06:34 PM   #7
Engine Surgeon
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland GA USA
Posts: 2,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaykay View Post
I was speaking of dual row versus single row extraction. Early on, according my information, there wasn't a known extraction method for the dual. Yes of course there was no kit yet either
Again, my procedure was the first for the dual row, and the RIMSEXT_01 was also the first extraction tool that was developed, and from day one it was designed to extract the dual row bearing.

The procedure and RIMSEXT_01 extractor tools were both developed before the first IMSR bearings were commercially released to the market.
__________________
Jake Raby/www.flat6innovations.com
IMS Solution/ Faultless Tool Inventor
US Patent 8,992,089 &
US Patent 9,416,697
Developer of The IMS Retrofit Procedure- M96/ M97 Specialist
Jake Raby is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page