Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Performance and Technical Chat

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-31-2014, 09:16 PM   #21
Registered User
 
jaykay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: toronto
Posts: 2,668
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jake Raby View Post
Again, my procedure was the first for the dual row, and the RIMSEXT_01 was also the first extraction tool that was developed, and from day one it was designed to extract the dual row bearing.

The procedure and RIMSEXT_01 extractor tools were both developed before the first IMSR bearings were commercially released to the market.
Yes, Jake that is how / what I have in my car....it is the LN bearing and the LN tooling used. I appreciate the development.

......correct or not I do recall gingerly waiting it out until the dual row kit was available as my model year could have had either. It was early on and one could drop the trans. and be out of luck if a shallow dish flange was staring at you.

__________________
986 00S
jaykay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2014, 04:42 AM   #22
Engine Surgeon
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland GA USA
Posts: 2,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaykay View Post
Yes, Jake that is how / what I have in my car....it is the LN bearing and the LN tooling used. I appreciate the development.

......correct or not I do recall gingerly waiting it out until the dual row kit was available as my model year could have had either. It was early on and one could drop the trans. and be out of luck if a shallow dish flange was staring at you.
No LN kits were sold until my retrofit procedure was adopted for the dual row.
Prior to this the only IMS component sold was the triple row fitted shaft assembly, requiring engine disassembly for fitment.

The very first LN IMS component was a quadruple bearing fitted shaft assembly, I built the first engine to ever be fitted with an LN bearing, using that shaft. It's still alive.
__________________
Jake Raby/www.flat6innovations.com
IMS Solution/ Faultless Tool Inventor
US Patent 8,992,089 &
US Patent 9,416,697
Developer of The IMS Retrofit Procedure- M96/ M97 Specialist
Jake Raby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2014, 10:03 AM   #23
Registered User
 
DennisAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 111
Jake,
I did my own install of the dual-row LN bearing last summer. Since it was an owner-install, there's no warranty. If I sent you the used factory bearing, would you still examine it and render an opinion to me?
__________________
Base 2000 986, beater 1996 Miata, 2011 Suzuki SX4 AWD
Feline mechanics Condoleezza and Dukie
DennisAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2014, 01:49 PM   #24
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sanford NC
Posts: 2,537
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jager View Post
No failure, just did not feel as smooth as a new bearing. I had the transmission down doing a clutch replacement and decided to check the bearing. Turned it with my fingers and it didn't feel silky smooth (as a new one), so I replaced it.

Also note that I have a single row bearing.
Applause for your miles.

Did you send the old LN back to Charles for them to look at?

What was the condition of the engine before the first LN install? Clean of debris?
mikefocke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2014, 06:19 PM   #25
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Houston
Posts: 370
Quote:
This is so LN can ensure that your old bearing was not failing, because if it was, your retrofit bearing will also likely fail
How does the original bearing failing impact a new bearing? And what's an expected life for a replacement bearing if the original is failing...at least long enough to make the replacement worth it?
__________________
DD summer/winter: 2000 Boxster S
DD spring/fall: 914-6 w/ 3.0L SC Dual Webers

http://imgur.com/a/k0Wtl - My 914-6 Build/Project Story
patssle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2014, 06:29 PM   #26
Registered User
 
Jager's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: California
Posts: 1,859
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikefocke View Post
Applause for your miles.

Did you send the old LN back to Charles for them to look at?

What was the condition of the engine before the first LN install? Clean of debris?
Hi Mike,
No I did not send the original bearing for LNE to look at, although I still have it and could send it to them if they really wanted it or needed it for failure testing. I decided to keep the original bearing as a trophy and show-n-tell conversation piece. Sometimes I pull it out of the drawer and just admire it, to spin it between my fingers and think of how many times that bearing has spun inside my motor, at outrageous velocities, and to think how that small part has created so much heart ache and pain for some yet opportunity and happiness for others… oops I digress… back to the point.

At the time I replaced the bearing I had no signs of failure, I just felt that I was pushing my luck with the high miles on the Jägermobile, it had over 200K miles on the odometer at the time. Attached is a photo of the original bearing. It spun freely with no resistance, not as smooth as a new LNE bearing by any means but it seemed to be OK. I am not a bearing expert; I’m sure spinning a bearing with your fingers is not complete and proper analysis, but my original bearing spun smooth and freely. There was a little play with the center bolt that a new bearing does not have, maybe a sign of some wear??





I change the oil every 4,000 to 5,000 miles, with each oil change I cut the filter open and inspect it. I have never found any debris of any kind, inside or outside the filter. I also have a LNE magnetic drain plug and have never seen anything on it to be concerned about when I inspect it.
__________________
Jäger

300K Mile Club
Jager is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2014, 06:32 PM   #27
Engine Surgeon
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland GA USA
Posts: 2,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by DennisAN View Post
Jake,
I did my own install of the dual-row LN bearing last summer. Since it was an owner-install, there's no warranty. If I sent you the used factory bearing, would you still examine it and render an opinion to me?
The bearings don't come to me, they go to LN.. My part of the classic retrofit bearings has been over for a long, long time now.

Quote:
How does the original bearing failing impact a new bearing? And what's an expected life for a replacement bearing if the original is failing...at least long enough to make the replacement worth it?
Debris from the original failure will remain within the engine, being very difficult to remove. These will chew the internals of the engine, and the retrofit bearing to bits.

If a bearing failed, the IMS assembly can also be compromised as it can see collateral damage in the form of housing runout. This can easily create a wobble and harmonic that will shred the retrofit bearing in short order.

This is why preventative retrofits are the only way to go- people won't listen to this until they have wasted 20K by thinking that it can't happen to them.

I have two "criers" this week... Those are failure calls where the owner starts crying.

__________________
Jake Raby/www.flat6innovations.com
IMS Solution/ Faultless Tool Inventor
US Patent 8,992,089 &
US Patent 9,416,697
Developer of The IMS Retrofit Procedure- M96/ M97 Specialist
Jake Raby is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page