Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Boxster General Discussions

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-02-2015, 09:22 AM   #1
Registered User
 
Perfectlap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 8,709
Why would anyone do a $16K rebuild and not remove the IMS altogether?
Was a direct oil feed introduced to mitigate the possibility of IMSB failure?
Has it not been established that the inherent flaw in the use of sealed bearing, inside of an engine, is that either oil starvation or contamination can exacerbate an ageing bearing or a defective one?

It seems to me that the very point of a rebuild (that exceeds the replacement cost of the vehicle) is that the most documented modes of failure are addressed as affirmatively as possible.

Why would someone leave a variable in the equation that could sink the whole expense?

Obviously there many ways that these engines can fail and one can spend much more than $16K, but this particular mode of failure is basically defying you to ignore it once you have the whole engine is apart.
__________________
GT3 Recaro Seats - Boxster Red
GT3 Aero / Carrera 18" 5 spoke / Potenza RE-11
Fabspeed Headers & Noise Maker
BORN: March 2000 - FINLAND
IMS#1 REPLACED: April 2010 - NEW JERSEY -- LNE DUAL ROW

Last edited by Perfectlap; 04-02-2015 at 09:30 AM.
Perfectlap is offline  
Old 04-02-2015, 09:49 AM   #2
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Port Saint Lucie, FL
Posts: 63
Quote:
Originally Posted by Perfectlap View Post
Why would anyone do a $16K rebuild and not remove the IMS altogether?
Was a direct oil feed introduced to mitigate the possibility of IMSB failure?
Has it not been established that the inherent flaw in the use of sealed bearing, inside of an engine, is that either oil starvation or contamination can exacerbate an ageing bearing or a defective one?

It seems to me that the very point of a rebuild (that exceeds the replacement cost of the vehicle) is that the most documented modes of failure are addressed as affirmatively as possible.

Why would someone leave a variable in the equation that could sink the whole expense?

Obviously there many ways that these engines can fail and one can spend much more than $16K, but this particular mode of failure is basically defying you to ignore it once you have the whole engine is apart.
Read my op again, you got it all wrong. He's out total 16k, including the newly rebuilt motor from us. That is 4k ln upgrade+clutch+aos, our rebuilt motor, local installation, etc... Our rebuilt motor has a roller bearing installed, as always.
porsche-land is offline  
Old 04-02-2015, 11:34 AM   #3
Engine Surgeon
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland GA USA
Posts: 2,425
I'll not engage any further, there's no need.

I'll just leave this right here for ya. Happy Easter!

__________________
Jake Raby/www.flat6innovations.com
IMS Solution/ Faultless Tool Inventor
US Patent 8,992,089 &
US Patent 9,416,697
Developer of The IMS Retrofit Procedure- M96/ M97 Specialist
Jake Raby is offline  
Closed Thread



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page