07-13-2009, 07:19 PM
|
#1
|
Porsche "Purist"
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 2,123
|
Charles I have attended one of your seminars and I have sent you one of my UOAs (at your request) that clearly showed that 11,000 miles and 17 months of use of M1 0w-40 was fine.
__________________
1998 Boxster with 7.8 DME, 2005 3.6 liter/325 hp, Variocam Plus, 996 Instrument panel
2001 Boxster original owner. I installed used motor at 89k.
1987 924S. 2002 996TT. PST-2
Owned and repaired Porsches since 1974. Porsche: It's not driving, it's therapy.
|
|
|
07-13-2009, 07:30 PM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 147
|
Sorry Paul, not trying to single you out. Just I get a lot of phone calls re: M1.
Most definitely Paul, your results showed that the 2 yr, 12,000 mi drain interval is certainly doable. I just had another sample of Pentosin 5w40 with 2 years and 7,000 mi still had a TBN of 7.2 (started at 10), with wear levels the lowest I've ever seen from an M96 engine (5w40, SL rated). Driving styles and habits clearly affect drain intervals, no argument there.
I myself have observed a 5,000 mi interval (with changes approximately every 6 months) gets me to a TBN of just under 5, which to some, is the sweet spot of when to change your oil. That's with mixed driving including short drives where the oil isn't given a chance to get hot enough to vapor off the water content. Winter driving also seems to reduce TBN faster and yield increased wear levels. Cars that aren't driven in the winter aren't subjected to the demands placed on the lubricant that otherwise a year round car might see.
Also, forgot to add, oil formulation has a great deal to do with drain interval too. Oils with less Zn and P will form less acid, allowing longer drain intervals. Secondly, the majority of oils, M1 included, use primarily a Ca-based detergent, that is more thermally stable and maintains TBN better, allowing for further longer drain intervals. A lot of the oils I personally like, due to formulation, would require shorter drain intervals accordingly. Good example of how this affects drain interval is Valvoline NSL Racing - they recommend a 600 mi drain interval on a 5 qt capacity, which I've verified through UOA, adjusting drain interval for increased volume.
__________________
Charles Navarro
President, LN Engineering and Bilt Racing Service
http://www.LNengineering.com
Home of Nickies, IMS Retrofit, and IMS Solution
Last edited by cnavarro; 07-13-2009 at 07:39 PM.
|
|
|
07-14-2009, 03:07 AM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Arlington Heights, IL
Posts: 1,561
|
Charles, there are 2 additional things I have also learned from your web site:
1) Oil filter changes 1/2 way through the oil drain interval
2) Always change the oil after the use of a fuel system cleaners like Chevron's with Techron
Can you please comment a little more about these recommendations, as to why you make these suggestions? Thanks!
Lastly, what is your opinion of Mobil's 5W50??
|
|
|
07-14-2009, 07:36 AM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 8,083
|
I used to use M1 exclusively in all my vehicles. Then, they started to get cagey about whether they really were selling a true syn oil. Many (including me) believe they now sell a hydro-cracked version under the M1 brand, rather than the Group 4 formula they had been selling.
Hence, I moved to Red Line.
Who knows the truth or if there is a "truth."
__________________
Rich Belloff
|
|
|
08-03-2009, 12:09 PM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: raleigh nc
Posts: 116
|
M1 a moving target!
I seems like the oil for a 97 boxster has been a moving target as forulations change. What would be the present recommendation for a 97 boxster with 100,000 miles on it?
This would be the first oil change since I bought it.
Thanks for all who respond.
__________________
97 Boxster 115k miles
3 spoke wheel,
OZ Racing Rims
|
|
|
08-03-2009, 12:52 PM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: It's a kind of magic.....
Posts: 6,617
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChefCarnivore
I seems like the oil for a 97 boxster has been a moving target as forulations change. What would be the present recommendation for a 97 boxster with 100,000 miles on it?
This would be the first oil change since I bought it.
Thanks for all who respond.
|
Consider a quality 10W-40 full synthetic with ACEA A3, B3, B4 ratings like Castrol Syntec.
|
|
|
08-03-2009, 02:08 PM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 319
|
I'm also currently using Castrol 5W40 (in an 01 base with 65K on it). I change somewhere between every 5000 and 7500 miles and take it to the track several times a year.
JFP....Would you recommend year round Castrol 10w40 for a car that gets regularly driven in the winter in temps sometimes below O deg F (excluding this last mild winter). Based on your recommendation above my next change (next month) will probably be Castrol 10w40, so I'm curious if I should continue to use it during the winter or go to the 5w40 for the cold weather.
Thanks
Bob
__________________
79 911SC Targa.. gone but not forgotten
2001 Boxster Black/Savanah Beige
RoW M030 suspension
7/15 mm spacers
Deambered
Desnorked
SS door sills
Debadged
Clear tails
Technobrace
Technobra
I'll never own another black car!
|
|
|
08-03-2009, 12:50 PM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: It's a kind of magic.....
Posts: 6,617
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brucelee
I used to use M1 exclusively in all my vehicles. Then, they started to get cagey about whether they really were selling a true syn oil. Many (including me) believe they now sell a hydro-cracked version under the M1 brand, rather than the Group 4 formula they had been selling.
Hence, I moved to Red Line.
Who knows the truth or if there is a "truth."
|
Major draw back I have with Red Line oils is their lack of ACEA ratings (I've learned not to trust API since it switched from being a specification watchdog to a public relations arm of the industry); although I'll give Red Line credit for admitting it, unlike other brands such as RP, who have gotten caught more than once playing games with what ratings they hold...............
|
|
|
08-03-2009, 05:20 PM
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: NV
Posts: 160
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JFP in PA
Major draw back I have with Red Line oils is their lack of ACEA ratings (I've learned not to trust API since it switched from being a specification watchdog to a public relations arm of the industry); although I'll give Red Line credit for admitting it, unlike other brands such as RP, who have gotten caught more than once playing games with what ratings they hold...............
|
I'm currently switching most of my cars over to Redline. I don't think it's fiscally prudent for a small nieche oil company to pursue gov. ratings as I imagine the costs associated with obtaining the rating would out weigh the bennefit of having it.
Last edited by 941MXVET; 08-03-2009 at 05:35 PM.
|
|
|
08-03-2009, 06:53 PM
|
#10
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Use 2B NW Ohio, now NE Ohio
Posts: 563
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 941MXVET
I'm currently switching most of my cars over to Redline. I don't think it's fiscally prudent for a small nieche oil company to pursue gov. ratings as I imagine the costs associated with obtaining the rating would out weigh the bennefit of having it.
|
Interesting point of view with regard to the Gov ratings. However, without the independent rating organization to verify the process and standards of the product ... Red Line is not held to anything... just their good name.
I am a believer in the Ratings.
__________________
My Porsche mechanic drives a Saturn.
'98 Artic Silver w/ Tip
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:30 AM.
| |