Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Performance and Technical Chat

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-23-2023, 01:58 PM   #1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2023
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 20
Audi 0A2 into base 986

Just before the summer I bought an old 97 Boxster base model with the intention of (in due time) swapping in a Audi V8 (BBK engine is what my eye is looking for).

The biggest unknown for me is the gearbox / driveshaft side of things. So I picked up a brand new Audi 0A2 gearbox yesterday. If my info is correct this should essentially be a G87.20 box, but with the tall diesel gearing.

Name:  0A2_new.jpg
Views: 426
Size:  101.3 KB

I plan to drop the gearbox from the Boxster sometime next month or November. That should tell me whether the bolts will align between engine and gearbox. The clutch doesn't worry me too much, as both are made for 240mm clutch, I am sure I can find a combination that works on both the engine and the gearbox.

Now the biggest question will be on the driveshafts. Is there any default shaft set that will fit. Or do I need either different flanges on the gearbox or different hubs on the car?

Any info would be greatly appreciated.


Last edited by Marc_986; 09-23-2023 at 02:00 PM. Reason: Added picture
Marc_986 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2023, 03:49 PM   #2
Motorist & Coffee Drinker
 
78F350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 3,672
Garage
I have not done it myself, but I'm pretty sure that with that transmission you can swap the flanges from a 5-speed 986 transmission. The flanges on that Audi transmission are spaced wider and take larger bolts than the '97 axles.

Check this if you haven't already seen it: Audi transmission Swap DIY Thread

It should bolt to the engine. Have you looked at shift linkage and mounts? I'm not sure about those. It might have the same attachment points.
__________________
I am not an attorney, mechanic, or member of the clergy. Following any advice given in my posts is done at your own peril.
78F350 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2023, 10:55 AM   #3
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2023
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 20
I didn't look at shift linkage yet, but sure that can be resolved easily enough.

The box I have seems a bit different from the one in the other thread (it doesn't list a transmission code, but that short gearing is not available in this box). Difference with the 986 5 speed is at least that the flanges are asymmetric. So assuming I will keep engine and box centered in the car, one side will need a shorter driveshaft than the other side. Quite sure that this is, again, similar to the 987 setup.

However, would 987 shafts fit the 986 non-S? Would they fit the S? Or neither? I am not aware of the details of the rear suspension between 986 and 987, would the width from hub to hub be the same?

I'll be looking into more detail on part numbers etc. , but any available info could help me underway much quicker. Seeing the prices of the Porsche boxes, I am quite happy to have found this Audi one new for about $ 500.
Marc_986 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2023, 11:18 AM   #4
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2023
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 20
So I did a bit of research and this is what I have found:

Axle width (distance between hub flanges) is very similar between 986 and 987.
Inner diameter of the bearing is same for all, but 986 base has smaller wheel bearings.
Wheel side spline of the driveshafts is equal for all.

986 S and 987 driveshafts will not fit the 986 base wheel carrier / upright. The issue is in the diameter of the shaft end not fitting.

Rear suspension of 987 is nearly indentical to 986.

All 986 and 987 have the same rear brake caliper
986 base and 987 base have the same front brake caliper
986 S and 987 S also have same front brake caliper.

So my best bet seems to go for 987 wheel carriers / uprights and 987 driveshafts. The 987 has same wheel carrier for both the base and the S, so I guess any brake disc will fit, but will check.

The only catch seems to be the diameter of the strut being larger on the 987. So likely I will need 987 struts as well. Any other issue I might be overlooking?
Marc_986 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2023, 11:43 AM   #5
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2023
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 20
So, more research done. The 987 axles are not going to work due to the difference in ABS sensors and resulting difference in axle side CV joint.

After measuring the old G86.00 against the 0A2 it seems that they are very close in where the axles are relative to the engine as well as relative to each other. And if my info is correct, the later 2.7 shafts are thicker and have the same / similar splines as the 986 S and the 987. So likely they will fit with the 987 CV joint on them.

In the mean time I pulled the old gearbox out. Comparing the two, it seems the 0A2 will mate directly to the engine and even input spline looks the same. Will take the clutch of the engine to trial fit later this week.
Marc_986 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2023, 01:26 PM   #6
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 85
Using belt driven Audi V8 and stock transmission/driveshaft/axles is a proven solution. Any reason you are trying to use BBK engine with timing chain?
1thenaton1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2023, 11:43 AM   #7
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2023
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 20
Nothing too specific other than some reasoning (which might prove wrong..)

- Chain drive engines are more compact, so hoping to give easier fit.
- Less ancilleries driven at the front of the engine, so might be easier to make the front mount
- Low mileage engines available (but I do need to check for availability on belt driven ones)
- Also using 7.1.1 DME, so that should be equally easy / hard.
- Could find the 0A2 transmission new and cheap. Current 5 speed is really tired and I do like a bit lower revs when cruising. As I read on bellhousing difference between V8 generations around this time frame I was worried other engines would not fit. Looking at it now, I think any Audi V8 will bolt up to 0A2.

Maybe I should open my eye for a damaged engine to better estimate the impact.

Other than the chain drive itself being known to have its troubles, any reason against the chain driven V8s?
Marc_986 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2023, 10:14 AM   #8
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2023
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 20
Slowly gathering more parts;

- 987 Transmission mounts used
- New Sachs clutch for the base 986
- 987 shifter + cables
- New 987 driveshaft flanges, see below;

Name:  0A2_cv_flange.jpg
Views: 163
Size:  153.8 KB

Also I have some parts to fix the current 2.5 engine. So will complete that first, than sort out the shift linkage of the 0A2 and mount it.

One question on the shift linkage; It seems the 987 uses a stiff spring to prevent accidental engagement of reverse. This spring must be in the transmission and it should be somewhere on the selector shaft. Can anyone confirm that it is the G87.20/21 specific selector shaft that is responsible? Stock Audi transmission doesn't have this, reverse lockout is in the shifter instead.

Just wondering whether it would make sense to insert a new selector shaft or just add the reverse spring in the shift mechanism.

Marc_986 is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page