12-19-2005, 05:48 AM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Boston area
Posts: 327
|
Hey DKLUMB that sounds good. Good price especially if the fix lasts and good news on the case bore.
|
|
|
01-23-2006, 05:07 AM
|
#2
|
Guest
|
2nd Rms Leak, Car Not Even Driven 40 Miles.
The Car Was Just In For A Last Warranty Check Up. In October For An Rms Leak Under Warranty. Yesterday I Took The Car Out Of The Garage To Start It Up, And Roll The Tires. I Found A Nice 1inch By 1inch Oil Leak Below The Car On The Ground. From The Last Oil Leak To Now, The Car Only Has 40clicks On It. Such A Sad Day. The Warranty Obviosly Is Up. The Car Is A 2002, With 18645miles. ****************ty Day
|
|
|
01-23-2006, 06:30 AM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Boston area
Posts: 327
|
Sounds like you have to talk to the dealer who did the warranty work. The RMS shouldn't go in 40 miles. There could be a bright side to this. Maybe it ain't your RMS that's leakin.
__________________
'04 Black Boxster, 18" Carerra wheels
"If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much space."
|
|
|
01-23-2006, 06:56 AM
|
#4
|
Guest
|
2nd Rms Leak, Car Not Even Driven 40 Miles.
Well i spoke to the service advisor right now, and in april i will take the car back to
get it looked at again. thats exactly what the advisor said, hopefully it isn't the rear main seal leak, and it's leaking from somewhere else. even the thought of it leaking from somewhere else makes me really mad. atleast if i had driven it and it
began to leak, i would take the fault. but dealership to my house and stored for the past 4 months and a leak. i did get the new updated seal, when they did the work under warranty, so they should / will cover the repair is what the advisor says.
i think i should take the car out of storage and start driving the car all year around. get some winter tires or all seasons. makes no sense to keep this car in storage, when it has such a huge problem, that will depreciate the car anyways. having the transmission opened for the second time. this is not what i expected in a $75,000 car bought new. i should start to treat the car like a honda, n run it into the ground. its really worth nothing, if every summer i have to put a new rear main seal for what $600 to $900. i think next year i will jump on the boat n drive a civic. oil will leak, but i can't imagine it leaking with 18,000 miles. my last homda prelude drove till 260,000km, one leak in the 15 years i drove the car. i'm on two leaks in 5 months.
|
|
|
01-25-2006, 06:06 AM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 180
|
Sorry to hear that.
But you really should drive the car. Use and enjoy it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by KronixSpeed
Well i spoke to the service advisor right now, and in april i will take the car back to
get it looked at again. thats exactly what the advisor said, hopefully it isn't the rear main seal leak, and it's leaking from somewhere else. even the thought of it leaking from somewhere else makes me really mad. atleast if i had driven it and it
began to leak, i would take the fault. but dealership to my house and stored for the past 4 months and a leak. i did get the new updated seal, when they did the work under warranty, so they should / will cover the repair is what the advisor says.
i think i should take the car out of storage and start driving the car all year around. get some winter tires or all seasons. makes no sense to keep this car in storage, when it has such a huge problem, that will depreciate the car anyways. having the transmission opened for the second time. this is not what i expected in a $75,000 car bought new. i should start to treat the car like a honda, n run it into the ground. its really worth nothing, if every summer i have to put a new rear main seal for what $600 to $900. i think next year i will jump on the boat n drive a civic. oil will leak, but i can't imagine it leaking with 18,000 miles. my last homda prelude drove till 260,000km, one leak in the 15 years i drove the car. i'm on two leaks in 5 months.
|
|
|
|
01-25-2006, 09:56 AM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 335
|
It would seem to me based on the conditions that cause the failure that cars that had the failure once would obviously be prone to future failures.. Also, one would think that if you've got an engine where the tolerances are iffy, you're going to have the problem sooner rather than later. If you're considering a used Boxster with more than, say, 35k on the clock and it's warranty history doesn't show an RMS repair you'd think you would not be prone to RMS failure.
*disclaimer - I am not a mechanic and I know the RMS may fail at any mileage*
|
|
|
01-25-2006, 11:19 AM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 380
|
A thought on the RMS--how about if we do our own poll?
Loren's survey is taking longer than expected so I wondered if we--collectively--could put together our own poll of RMS/engine failure experience in a context similar to the New/used poll?
Keeping if simple from the onset, I 'm thinking
--Have you experienced an RMS leak? (yes/no)
--Have you experienced mutiple RMS leaks? (yes/no)
--Have you experienced an engine failure? (yes/no)
The particulars (mileage, which model, transmission,driving/break-in habits,etc...) could be covered in the individual message for mine for data at a later date.
I don't think our little group would pass the sniff test for a statistically viable sample of all Boxster owners in the US but it would be more useful than anecdotal comments that we've all read.
What do you think?
if it makes sense,I'll start it off:
No
No
No
'99', 5 spd, 39K, followed break in suggestions and maintenance schedule, 6 auto-x +1 DE per year.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:13 PM.
| |