01-16-2012, 12:47 PM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Littleton, CO
Posts: 456
|
Revisiting the underdrive pully topic for fresh info.
I'm going to install a UDP soon, and want to get everyone's take on the "latest and greatest." My primary reason for installing the UDP is to hopefully prevent damage to my power steering system. I get a few track days in every year and have noticed the power steering fluid get low at times. Of course, I'm not going to deny a couple extra HP would be nice, but that is secondary for my priorities. I'm mainly hoping to save money on future repairs. Along those lines, I may also install the LN power steering fluid cooler.
UDP manufacturers have come out with a few designs. Ideally, I'd get the lightest, smallest pulley. It seems to me like there have been no ill side effects with even the smallest pulleys out there. So who makes the smallest and lightest one out there? I think I read the BBI unit is a 16% reduction, and the RSS is 15%. Can anyone confirm this? Is there any other one I should consider?
I know there has been a lot of talk about this, but didn't see any recent posts. With how quickly things like this change, I thought there may be a newer or better option out there. Again, my priorities are to have a significant decrease in accessories speed. Yes, I understand there may be ill side effects if I go too much in that direction.
Thanks guys!:dance:
__________________
"Of all the extreme sports I've ever participated in- windsurfing, kite boarding, wake boarding, tow-in surfing and snowboarding- skiing, for me, made everything else easy."
-Chuck Patterson
|
|
|
01-16-2012, 03:18 PM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,810
|
I have the BBI pulley on my vehicle . Although I can't say for certain what the actual reduction in weight is, the quality and design of it was nothing short of remarkable . In addition, the people at BBI were great to deal with . I highly recommend it .
__________________
Don't worry … I've got the microfilm.
|
|
|
01-16-2012, 03:21 PM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Littleton, CO
Posts: 456
|
FWIW, the percentage figures I listed are reduction in drive, not weight. While weight reduction is nice, it is far less significant to me than drive reduction.
__________________
"Of all the extreme sports I've ever participated in- windsurfing, kite boarding, wake boarding, tow-in surfing and snowboarding- skiing, for me, made everything else easy."
-Chuck Patterson
|
|
|
01-17-2012, 04:52 AM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,810
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pat
FWIW, the percentage figures I listed are reduction in drive, not weight. While weight reduction is nice, it is far less significant to me than drive reduction.
|
My mistake, I thought the percentages that you were referring to had to do with weight . In any case, I found the following info based on a 996 application:
Weight;
Stock - 860.1 grams
BBI - 200.5 grams
Crank snout engagement depth;
Stock - 7.5mm
BBI - 14mm
Overall Diameter;
Stock - 142mm
BBI - 115mm
HP Gains;
8-12.5 WHP
We are proud to say that this is 100% made in the USA...From the materials to the machining and the anodizing.
__________________
Don't worry … I've got the microfilm.
|
|
|
01-17-2012, 06:09 AM
|
#5
|
Track rat
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Southern ID
Posts: 3,701
|
Don't overthink the pulley. It does improve the life of PS pumps and probably alternators as well on cars that spend a lot of time in high rpm. Remember that the smaller the pulley, the slower the water pump turns so there are practical limits. It does lessen the parasitic loss from running the accessories but dyno results from the Boxster spec series looked like it was in the 3-5hp range. Finding a real 12hp with an UD pulley is the stuff of fantasy. A well balanced pulley is probably far more important than getting the absolute smallest.
__________________
2009 Cayman 2.9L PDK (with a few tweaks)
PCA-GPX Chief Driving Instructor-Ret.
|
|
|
01-17-2012, 06:18 AM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Littleton, CO
Posts: 456
|
Thanks, JD. I'm not confident those numbers also apply to the Boxster pulley. I certainly hope they do, though! 
Those figures show a 19% reduction in drive, and a bigger HP bump than I've seen claimed elsewhere. The dynos I've seen with the Boxster UDPs seem to be up 6 to 7 CHP.
Your thoughts? It would be great if this also applies to the Boxster.
__________________
"Of all the extreme sports I've ever participated in- windsurfing, kite boarding, wake boarding, tow-in surfing and snowboarding- skiing, for me, made everything else easy."
-Chuck Patterson
|
|
|
01-17-2012, 06:52 AM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Littleton, CO
Posts: 456
|
Thanks, Topless. The BBI pulley looks very well balanced in their testing. I get the impression like you think the UDPs are all pretty much the same. Also, I am of course concerned the with practical limits you speak of. That said, I don't get the impression I would bump into any of these limits with the offerings currently available. That's why I am trying to split hairs here.
Do you know which pulley the BSX cars are using, and what the drive reduction is?
TIA
__________________
"Of all the extreme sports I've ever participated in- windsurfing, kite boarding, wake boarding, tow-in surfing and snowboarding- skiing, for me, made everything else easy."
-Chuck Patterson
|
|
|
01-17-2012, 07:33 AM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,810
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pat
Thanks, JD. I'm not confident those numbers also apply to the Boxster pulley. I certainly hope they do, though! 
Those figures show a 19% reduction in drive, and a bigger HP bump than I've seen claimed elsewhere. The dynos I've seen with the Boxster UDPs seem to be up 6 to 7 CHP.
Your thoughts? It would be great if this also applies to the Boxster.
|
The 996 stats were the only ones that I could find . I imagine that the figures for the boxster are different . How much is unknown ? However, I would agreed on the 6 to 8 hp gain though .
__________________
Don't worry … I've got the microfilm.
|
|
|
01-17-2012, 12:47 AM
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Queensland, Australia
Posts: 1,522
|
I fitted the Flat6 UD pulley two years ago - the only negative is a slight voltage drop from the Pternator @ 850 rpm, but it regains back to Porsche specs (13,5v) @ 1,500 rpm - no issues to date.
Its the best bang for your buck currently available......
__________________
2001 Boxster S (triple black). Sleeping easier with LN Engineering/Flat 6 IMS upgrade, low temp thermostat & underspeed pulley.
2001 MV Agusta F4.
|
|
|
04-28-2012, 03:01 PM
|
#10
|
Carnut
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 775
|
The tool is for holding the original pulley in place so that you can get the bolt undone. As I mentioned in my earlier post the bolt is VERY tight and you need a lot of force.
The "boss/block" is part of the engine block. Due to the different design of the original pulley and the RSS pulley this boss is in the way of your new pulley and has to come off, you'll see! Use a hacksaw, much easier than a Dremel or such.
Basically totally easy to do, bolt is the hardest part....
Good luck!
__________________
'14 Boxster
|
|
|
04-28-2012, 03:03 PM
|
#11
|
Ex Esso kid
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 1,605
|
You are going to need a different belt when you finish as well.
|
|
|
04-28-2012, 03:11 PM
|
#12
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Philly
Posts: 594
|
Already have the updated smaller belt for the RSS UDP.
Did you guys reuse the pulley bolt? I read on one of the UDP manufacturer sites that you need new bolt and should not reuse the old bolt.
My Wrench is 14 inches long so it has lots of leverage, but I still couldn't get that bolt open. I will hit the wrench with a hammer to see if that helps.
So is it easy to saw off? RSS said that it was an easy installation no extra tools required. Liars.
__________________
00 2.7 5SPD MT
|
|
|
04-28-2012, 03:17 PM
|
#13
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: mass
Posts: 731
|
i am getting ready to do this and i went with the RSS kit and shorter belt. I have not installed it yet , hopefully soon .
|
|
|
04-28-2012, 04:36 PM
|
#14
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Upper Marlboro, Md.
Posts: 268
|
I'm interested in this as well. Where do I buy the kit with the pulley, belt, and tool?
__________________
'99 Boxster Artic Silver/Red
'14 Subaru Outback
'06 EG Classic
'05 Sportster
|
|
|
04-28-2012, 04:53 PM
|
#15
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,810
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brockmeister
I'm interested in this as well. Where do I buy the kit with the pulley, belt, and tool?
|
BBI AutoSport, Road Sport Supply and Jake Raby all offer excellent LWUD pulleys .
__________________
Don't worry … I've got the microfilm.
|
|
|
04-28-2012, 07:17 PM
|
#16
|
Carnut
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 775
|
I re-used the original bolt, not issues as of today (1 year and a few thousand miles). I also re-used the original belt, it was in almost new shape. When the belt is due I will however go for a slightly shorter one.
__________________
'14 Boxster
|
|
|
04-28-2012, 08:11 PM
|
#17
|
1999 base
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Coral Springs FL
Posts: 1,617
|
|
|
|
04-28-2012, 09:46 PM
|
#18
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Queensland, Australia
Posts: 1,522
|
Project...
You can use the old bolt but a new one is less than $5 from Porsche.
If you use the original bolt, I would recommend cleaning the threads (including the internal threads in the crankshaft) with alcohol or thinners and then coating with Loctite thread locker.
Torque bolt to 50 Nm PLUS another 90 deg of your torque wrench (from positions 12 o'clock to 3 o'clock).
__________________
2001 Boxster S (triple black). Sleeping easier with LN Engineering/Flat 6 IMS upgrade, low temp thermostat & underspeed pulley.
2001 MV Agusta F4.
|
|
|
04-29-2012, 05:32 PM
|
#19
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 380
|
This may have been addressed in an earlier thread, but does cutting off this boss on the block prevent you from locking the cams in place? I thought i saw that somewhere.
__________________
2013 Boxster S
2006 Boxster--sold
1999 Boxster--sold
|
|
|
04-30-2012, 05:49 PM
|
#20
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,466
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikenOH
This may have been addressed in an earlier thread, but does cutting off this boss on the block prevent you from locking the cams in place? I thought i saw that somewhere.
|
On the RSS, the belt portion of the pulley runs right over the top of the hole in the boss. NO way to utilize the hole. I figured I would put the old one back on if I needed to lock it down. I also reused my attaching bolt no real problem noted. RSS came with a holding tool to tighten the bolt.
__________________
2003 Black 986. modified for Advanced level HPDE and open track days.
* 3.6L LN block, 06 heads, Carrillo H rods, IDP with 987 intake, Oil mods, LN IMS. * Spec II Clutch, 3.2L S Spec P-P FW. * D2 shocks, GT3 arms & and links, Spacers front and rear * Weight reduced, No carpet, AC deleted, Remote PS pump, PS pump deleted. Recaro Pole position seats, Brey crouse ext. 5 point harness, NHP sport exhaust
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:52 PM.
| |