Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Performance and Technical Chat

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-09-2015, 03:41 PM   #21
Motorist & Coffee Drinker
 
78F350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 3,672
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by JFP in PA View Post
And for your reference, the was a later supplement to the Porsche service manual (a3050371, dated 2002) which reads:

"25 Nm(19 ft. lb.) plus 120 degrees."

That later data remains current according to Porsches electronic information system, PIWIS TSI.
Always makes me feel good when my manual agrees with JFP.


78F350 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2015, 06:23 PM   #22
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: DE
Posts: 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by JFP in PA View Post
This is one of the reasons why Porsche uses “micro encapsulated” single use fasteners in several locations (like the flywheel),
Is this true with all engines? The OEM FW bolts I ordered for my 2.5 are not micro encapsulated. 999 073 092 02 Did I get the wrong ones?

thanks
spendy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2015, 05:13 AM   #23
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: California
Posts: 246
Thanks all.
PorscheFan5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2015, 05:27 AM   #24
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: It's a kind of magic.....
Posts: 6,273
Quote:
Originally Posted by spendy View Post
Is this true with all engines? The OEM FW bolts I ordered for my 2.5 are not micro encapsulated. 999 073 092 02 Did I get the wrong ones?

thanks
Not all engine's use them, but the M96/97 did. The bolts should have a blue-green area on the treads that is the micro encapsulated thread locker. If they do not, just use Loctite and you will be fine.
__________________
Anything really new is invented only in one’s youth. Later, one becomes more experienced, more famous – and more stupid.” - Albert Einstein
JFP in PA is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2015, 08:58 AM   #25
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: California
Posts: 246
Quote:
Originally Posted by JFP in PA View Post
Porsche factory components are "somewhat" balanced, but probably not to the RPM levels the electric motor can turn. You might want to consider having an engine balancing shop true yours up.
JFP,

I checked with a local Machine Shop and they indicated that they balance at 500 RPMs and that's it. They indicated that that is what most shops will do. Given that then does it still make sense on spending $150 and taking the DMFW to the shop to zero balance at 500 rpm?

Separate question, how do people know that their FW is worn out and they need a new FW? My Boxster has 59K miles on it. To me the FW looks pretty good. Also With the EV I am not going to be shifting much and hence the FW (and Clutch) won't wear down as much. How do I make sure that I have reasonably ok FW? If I post some pictures, could someone who knows this stuff make out or it has to be physically examined?

Sorry of my questions are real basic...
PorscheFan5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2015, 09:30 AM   #26
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: It's a kind of magic.....
Posts: 6,273
Quote:
Originally Posted by PorscheFan5 View Post
JFP,

I checked with a local Machine Shop and they indicated that they balance at 500 RPMs and that's it. They indicated that that is what most shops will do. Given that then does it still make sense on spending $150 and taking the DMFW to the shop to zero balance at 500 rpm?

Separate question, how do people know that their FW is worn out and they need a new FW? My Boxster has 59K miles on it. To me the FW looks pretty good. Also With the EV I am not going to be shifting much and hence the FW (and Clutch) won't wear down as much. How do I make sure that I have reasonably ok FW? If I post some pictures, could someone who knows this stuff make out or it has to be physically examined?

Sorry of my questions are real basic...
Try a better balancing shop. In any case, even lower RPM balancing is better than not.

There is a standard factory test for the dual mass that measures twist of the elastomeric component. Porsche has released a Technical Service Bulletin on checking the dual-mass flywheel (TSB 911 8/02 1360). Basically, you are looking for a maximum of 15MM movement between the segment's.

Here is the bulletin for the 996, which is basically the same: http://www.pelicanparts.com/techarticles/Boxster_Tech/44-TRANS-Clutch/DualFlywheelTechBulletin.pdf
__________________
Anything really new is invented only in one’s youth. Later, one becomes more experienced, more famous – and more stupid.” - Albert Einstein
JFP in PA is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2015, 09:42 AM   #27
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: California
Posts: 246
Thanks JFP!

When I read your response, I said great, now I can check my FW. Then I said wait, it said twist and how am I supposed to twist it? Rather than ask the stupid question on the forum I searched youtube and found my answer...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uLp6nlYMssA

I will check it out. Also will check another machine shop.

Cheers for now.
PorscheFan5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2015, 12:26 PM   #28
1999 base
 
Meir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Coral Springs FL
Posts: 1,617
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by 78F350 View Post
Always makes me feel good when my manual agrees with JFP.
i stand correct, as the manual i have is from 98.
Meir is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2015, 12:54 PM   #29
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: It's a kind of magic.....
Posts: 6,273
Quote:
Originally Posted by Meir View Post
i stand correct, as the manual i have is from 98.
You should check around and see if anyone is selling the supplements, there were over 100 of them for the 986's, some with as many as a dozen individual pages.
__________________
Anything really new is invented only in one’s youth. Later, one becomes more experienced, more famous – and more stupid.” - Albert Einstein
JFP in PA is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2015, 02:10 PM   #30
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: California
Posts: 246
I found a good shop that can do the balancing.

Question: Does anyone know if the Boxtser 2.7L engine is internally balanced or externally balanced? The shop owner (it is a racing shop), who is quite knowledgeable, asked the question...

Cheers.
PorscheFan5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2015, 02:39 PM   #31
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: It's a kind of magic.....
Posts: 6,273
Internally balanced .
__________________
Anything really new is invented only in one’s youth. Later, one becomes more experienced, more famous – and more stupid.” - Albert Einstein
JFP in PA is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2015, 10:13 AM   #32
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: California
Posts: 246
JFP,

Attached are some pics of my DMFW before clean-up. Would you agree that it seems in good condition? I tested based on the testing procedure you posted. The twisting results in deveation of about 10-12mm. So that is good. It is identical on both sides.

However, the FW does not go back to the original position (center) when released after twisting. Please tell me that I don't need to get another FW... I am planning on taking the FW for balancing today. Hopefully you'll see this message and are able to respond.

Thanks!


Last edited by PorscheFan5; 07-13-2015 at 10:35 AM.
PorscheFan5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2015, 11:52 AM   #33
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: It's a kind of magic.....
Posts: 6,273
Quote:
Originally Posted by PorscheFan5 View Post
JFP,

Attached are some pics of my DMFW before clean-up. Would you agree that it seems in good condition? I tested based on the testing procedure you posted. The twisting results in deveation of about 10-12mm. So that is good. It is identical on both sides.

However, the FW does not go back to the original position (center) when released after twisting. Please tell me that I don't need to get another FW... I am planning on taking the FW for balancing today. Hopefully you'll see this message and are able to respond.

Thanks!

The flywheel should return to its original position after being tested. If it does not, the elastomer is failing and the unit needs to be replaced.
__________________
Anything really new is invented only in one’s youth. Later, one becomes more experienced, more famous – and more stupid.” - Albert Einstein
JFP in PA is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2015, 11:59 AM   #34
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: California
Posts: 246
Thanks JFP.

Bummer. Now I need to get a DMF now...

While I am replacing the DMF, and given that I will be mating it with the Warp 9 DC motor and not the engine, should I go for a single mass FW? My clutch remains the same, correct?

Thanks!
PorscheFan5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2015, 06:02 PM   #35
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: It's a kind of magic.....
Posts: 6,273
Quote:
Originally Posted by PorscheFan5 View Post
Thanks JFP.

Bummer. Now I need to get a DMF now...

While I am replacing the DMF, and given that I will be mating it with the Warp 9 DC motor and not the engine, should I go for a single mass FW? My clutch remains the same, correct?

Thanks!
If I understand you DC set up, it is a constant torque at any RPM. If that is the case, you can use any flywheel that is properly balanced.
__________________
Anything really new is invented only in one’s youth. Later, one becomes more experienced, more famous – and more stupid.” - Albert Einstein
JFP in PA is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2015, 06:34 PM   #36
Engine Surgeon
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland GA USA
Posts: 2,425
Getting back on topic....
Just finished editing the 996 and 997 today. We hadn't planned on a Boxster version, but can do one.
Sounds like you guys need this:
Here's a copy of the cover
__________________
Jake Raby/www.flat6innovations.com
IMS Solution/ Faultless Tool Inventor
US Patent 8,992,089 &
US Patent 9,416,697
Developer of The IMS Retrofit Procedure- M96/ M97 Specialist
Jake Raby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2015, 08:50 PM   #37
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: California
Posts: 246
JFP,

Thanks for your response. Therefore if I can find a DMF for and S model, would that work too? Is the fitment and diameter same or different? Can I use my exisiting Clutch with an S-FW? Or do I need to change clutch too?

Appreciate all the help! Thanks!
PorscheFan5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2022, 12:44 PM   #38
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by JFP in PA View Post
There are not two procedures, there are two stages; for the flywheel bolts (new only, do not reuse), torque to 19 ft lb, then tighten another 120 degrees of rotation to gain the correct bolt stretch. For the pressure plate, torque to 17 ft lb.
Is 17 ft lb correct for the clutch pressure plate. Installing soon. Thanks.
2001 Boxster S
Paul Lohman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2022, 12:54 PM   #39
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: It's a kind of magic.....
Posts: 6,273
Yes, new bolts only, dab of blue Loctite.

__________________
Anything really new is invented only in one’s youth. Later, one becomes more experienced, more famous – and more stupid.” - Albert Einstein
JFP in PA is online now   Reply With Quote
Post Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page