Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Boxster General Discussions

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-18-2018, 05:08 AM   #1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: VA
Posts: 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by maytag View Post
The car had 112k miles on it.... well outside the failure window.
I would have thought the same. Is there a mileage point where there is some level of agreement that failure is unlikely?
__________________
2004 996 40th Anniversary
VeryRed997 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2018, 05:16 AM   #2
Who's askin'?
 
maytag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Utah
Posts: 2,448
Quote:
Originally Posted by VeryRed997 View Post
I would have thought the same. Is there a mileage point where there is some level of agreement that failure is unlikely?
I'm not an expert; very new to these cars as well. However I read all over the internet that 60k miles is the magic number.
Point of fact: there are many anecdotal instances of people who changed their IMS as a precautionary measure, only to have the replacement fail shortly thereafter.

If you ask me, based on what passes for research at my house, I'd say you're safer with an unfailed original IMS at 112k miles, than you are with a recently - replaced IMS (depending on which replacement is installed, of course).

I'm in a similar position myself, with a few extra miles. I've decided that even when I do the clutch this winter, I'll probably leave the IMS well - enough alone.

Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk
maytag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2018, 11:30 AM   #3
Registered User
 
BYprodriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: O.C. CA
Posts: 3,709
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by VeryRed997 View Post
I would have thought the same. Is there a mileage point where there is some level of agreement that failure is unlikely?
Nothing last forever, and they are using Mobil 1 oil.
__________________
OE engine rebuilt,3.6 litre LN Engineering billet sleeves,triple row IMSB,LN rods. Deep sump oil pan with DT40 oil.
BYprodriver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2018, 12:02 PM   #4
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: It's a kind of magic.....
Posts: 6,637
Quote:
Originally Posted by VeryRed997 View Post
I would have thought the same. Is there a mileage point where there is some level of agreement that failure is unlikely?
Not really, there is always some element of risk, more so with some bearing designs or usage.
__________________
Anything really new is invented only in one’s youth. Later, one becomes more experienced, more famous – and more stupid.” - Albert Einstein
JFP in PA is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2018, 01:45 PM   #5
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: SoCal
Posts: 118
here is a receipt of mine and this does not include labor yet. You will see the details of the LNE IMS.



Name:  13A1B45B-1374-44DD-9A27-5831E6BD884A.jpeg
Views: 2085
Size:  299.2 KB

Name:  6E793254-78DE-45D5-992B-D4BE1012555E.jpeg
Views: 1002
Size:  278.1 KB
ndfrigi is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page