| 
        | 
 
 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		|  07-21-2017, 02:07 PM | #1 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Houston, Texas 
					Posts: 7,243
				      | 
			37k on the replacement motor put in the car weeks before I purchased it without an IMS change.
 I drive it like I stole it too. Every single time I take the car out of the garage.
 
 I have decided that life is short and I am going to drive a Porsche like a Porsche and not worry about what might fail.
 
 Hey, if I can get the motor to implode one way or another, I have an excuse to put a big Chevy V8 in it and start street racing doctors in turbos!
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  07-21-2017, 02:16 PM | #2 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Midwest 
					Posts: 1,746
				      | 
			My Cousin has a base 1999 with ~ 90k miles.  The only thing he has done was pay the dealer to tweak the top when it was out of sync.  He has never visited this nor any other Boxster Forum and couldn't care less, He just drives it. 
I wish I had his non-interest perspective.  I replaced the IMS bearing (on my old 2002 Boxster S) at ~ 30k and the original was as tight as a drum, no pending issues whatsoever.   I read, I freaked, I reacted and spent money I should not of, live and learn........   |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  07-23-2017, 04:26 AM | #3 |  
	| Bilmar72 
				 
				Join Date: Jul 2017 Location: Perth, Australia 
					Posts: 5
				      | 
				
				IMS Changed
			 
 
			I changed mine at 65,000 kms (40,000 miles). Tiptronic so no clutch change to do IMS.  Original bearing single row, full of oil but no grease.  When cleaned very loose and outer race surface starting to fail (chatter marks, see pic).  But SINGLE ROW.   |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  07-23-2017, 06:30 AM | #4 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Jun 2017 Location: Madison, WI 
					Posts: 114
				      | 
			'99, 118k, not terribly worried.  If I had a single row bearing I'd probably do it though.
		 
				__________________'99 986 Ocean Blue Metallic
 '87 924S, winter beater
 '17 VW Golf Sportwagen, for when I need extra seats
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  07-23-2017, 09:01 AM | #5 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Sanford NC 
					Posts: 2,593
				      | 
			Sample quantity one anecdotes are interesting but meaningless. 
 I'm guessing around 30k bearings changed considering all suppliers and all bearing types.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  07-23-2017, 04:30 PM | #6 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: New Jersey 
					Posts: 8,709
				      | 
			I will just add this, all bearings need to be replaced at some interval, even dual row. There is no such thing as a lifetime bearing doing the heavy lifting of this particular application.
		 
				__________________GT3 Recaro Seats - Boxster Red
 GT3 Aero / Carrera 18" 5 spoke / Potenza RE-11
 Fabspeed Headers & Noise Maker
 BORN: March 2000 - FINLAND
 IMS#1 REPLACED: April 2010 - NEW JERSEY -- LNE DUAL ROW
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  07-25-2017, 12:15 PM | #7 |  
	| 2001 Boxster S  6sp 
				 
				Join Date: Nov 2015 Location: Green Valley, AZ 
					Posts: 62
				      | 
			01 S, Rain Forest Green Metallic - 74K miles, 3500 mile trip coming up.  All Clutch components will be replaced prior to trip.  Regular yearly oil changes using DT-40.  Oil Analysis and filter element examinations been great.  Nothing to indicate anything breaking down.  I am second owner and have no documentation that the IMSB was replaced.
		 
				__________________2001 Porsche Boxster S
 2022 Hyundai Santa Cruz
 1983 Alfa Romeo Spider  (PO)
 1969 Morgan 4/4 1600 (PO)
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  07-25-2017, 08:58 PM | #8 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Apr 2016 Location: SE Michigan 
					Posts: 496
				      | 
			'97 with 77K miles, only 8K miles under my ownership over 15 months. No documented IMSB or clutch work done, no RMS leak. Engine runs smooth and feels strong, so no worries, just biannual oil change and keeping the rev above 3,000 rpm 90% of time and often over 5,000 rpm at every gear shift to keep the bearing lubed and me smiling. if it blows up, I'll have a joy of debating to keep it stock or upgrade to 3.4. I like the way I can floor my 2.5 often without risking me or anybody getting into trouble.
		 
				__________________1997 Boxster arctic silver/ red, XNE riveted mahogany/ leather steering wheel & 917-style wood shift knob, Ben’s short shifter, PSE, 996 TB, UDP, stereo/ center console delete, hardtop and speedster humps, daily driver rain or shine or snow!
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  07-26-2017, 05:16 AM | #9 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Jun 2016 Location: Detroit 
					Posts: 211
				      | 
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Boxstard  '97 with 77K miles, only 8K miles under my ownership over 15 months. No documented IMSB or clutch work done, no RMS leak. Engine runs smooth and feels strong, so no worries, just biannual oil change and keeping the rev above 3,000 rpm 90% of time and often over 5,000 rpm at every gear shift to keep the bearing lubed and me smiling. if it blows up, I'll have a joy of debating to keep it stock or upgrade to 3.4. I like the way I can floor my 2.5 often without risking me or anybody getting into trouble. |  
'98 base with original IMS, RMS, and clutch 77,800 miles.  Blackstone oil sample check done last oil change showed much lower than average metal in oil.  No leaks.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  07-26-2017, 04:46 AM | #10 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Apr 2017 Location: Upstate, SC 
					Posts: 66
				      | 
			13 years and 58,000 miles on original clutch and IMSB. RMS weeps. Don't worry either but will replace both when clutch goes.
		 
				__________________2 0 0 1 S
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  07-27-2017, 08:38 AM | #11 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: ga 
					Posts: 115
				      | 
			Brave souls. If it does fail and trashes the engine it will be hard to find a replacement.  From what I have heard, someone or probably several someones, has been buying up every available engine. porsche no longer offers a core allowance either. For a relatively cheap maintenance item, I just don't understand the thought process and I had three with no failures prior to replacing. 
 
 Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
				__________________2000 Black 996 Aero, 2001 Forest Green Boxster S, 94 Midnight Blue 968 Cab, 1980 Pongee Beige 911SC Weissach Edition, 2004 BMW R1200CLC
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  08-02-2017, 10:49 PM | #12 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Nov 2016 Location: London 
					Posts: 234
				      | 
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by ymkmkrz  Brave souls. If it does fail and trashes the engine it will be hard to find a replacement.  From what I have heard, someone or probably several someones, has been buying up every available engine. porsche no longer offers a core allowance either. For a relatively cheap maintenance item, I just don't understand the thought process and I had three with no failures prior to replacing. 
 
 Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 |  
Nothing brave about it. Take care of your car and it will take care of you. Regular oil changes and proper maintenance will keep it singing for years, or you can treat it like a Hyundai beater and watch it fail. My car has 103000 miles on it and done 10000 this year, it gets driven hard and gears don't get changed most of the time until after 4000 rpm. I use it like Porsche intended it to be used and love doing so, i believe that if you get out and actually drive a car it does it the world of good as things stay lubricated and spinning. As Magnus says "get out and drive" and i reckon that the happiest cars are getting exactly that. 
 
As for the scaremongering that seems to happen on this forum about this subject it really needs to calm down as people are more than informed about their choices on this and don't need it ramming down their throat in an almost religious zealot fashion.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  08-03-2017, 07:48 AM | #13 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: May 2014 Location: S.California 
					Posts: 2,029
				      | 
			The comments below may only apply to an M96 with exactly the same IMS-related tolerances as the hyundai beater cited.Your engine may be different - better or worse.That is the essence of the M96 IMS issue - multiple mechanical variations leading to unpredictable failure. Postmortems can give an explanation of some of the proximate causes of failure.Driving style is cited but only in a few of the contributory factors(e.g. acidity in lubricant). 
 The  IMS research findings on this Forum are that M96 engines vary in critical dimensions and tolerances. The more  adverse tolerances your engine has, the sooner the bearing will fail.  
Chest-beating  comments like 'drive it like you stole it' do not frighten out-of-round IMS tube measurements into obedient concentricity. 
The recommendation below may hasten IMSB failure(and other weak components) but according to the recommendation below .the car will die happy. We may be muddling Mechanical Engineering and collective Forum wisdom with Anthropology ? 
First, do no harm. 
Second, find a competent,honest Indie. 
It is all in Search. 
Yemv
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by That986  Nothing brave about it. Take care of your car and it will take care of you. Regular oil changes and proper maintenance will keep it singing for years, or you can treat it like a Hyundai beater and watch it fail. My car has 103000 miles on it and done 10000 this year, it gets driven hard and gears don't get changed most of the time until after 4000 rpm. I use it like Porsche intended it to be used and love doing so, i believe that if you get out and actually drive a car it does it the world of good as things stay lubricated and spinning. As Magnus says "get out and drive" and i reckon that the happiest cars are getting exactly that. 
 As for the scaremongering that seems to happen on this forum about this subject it really needs to calm down as people are more than informed about their choices on this and don't need it ramming down their throat in an almost religious zealot fashion.
 | 
				 Last edited by Gelbster; 08-03-2017 at 07:53 AM.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  08-03-2017, 09:39 AM | #14 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Nov 2016 Location: London 
					Posts: 234
				      | 
			Blah, blah, blah, about what I expected. I was wondering when the united ims replacement front would show up.  
Can we actually get back to the thread in hand and pass on the "omg you better replace it now" comments?
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Gelbster  The comments below may only apply to an M96 with exactly the same IMS-related tolerances as the hyundai beater cited.Your engine may be different - better or worse.That is the essence of the M96 IMS issue - multiple mechanical variations leading to unpredictable failure. Postmortems can give an explanation of some of the proximate causes of failure.Driving style is cited but only in a few of the contributory factors(e.g. acidity in lubricant).The  IMS research findings on this Forum are that M96 engines vary in critical dimensions and tolerances. The more  adverse tolerances your engine has, the sooner the bearing will fail.
 Chest-beating  comments like 'drive it like you stole it' do not frighten out-of-round IMS tube measurements into obedient concentricity.
 The recommendation below may hasten IMSB failure(and other weak components) but according to the recommendation below .the car will die happy. We may be muddling Mechanical Engineering and collective Forum wisdom with Anthropology ?
 First, do no harm.
 Second, find a competent,honest Indie.
 It is all in Search.
 Yemv
 |  |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  08-03-2017, 11:21 AM | #15 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: May 2014 Location: S.California 
					Posts: 2,029
				      | 
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by That986  Blah, blah, blah, about what I expected. I was wondering when the united ims replacement front would show up. 
 Can we actually get back to the thread in hand and pass on the "omg you better replace it now" comments?
 |  
If you have a technical comment to add to the collective wisdom at Rennlist or this Forum -we're all eyeballs.Did you understand Mike's comment?  
Replacing the IMSB proactively may be futile - see below. 
One unique example  - I personally did a complete rebuild on an M96 that had had the original (85kmiles) 'still serviceable' single row IMSB.The P.O. replaced it but failed to address a more serious issue. The upgrade hybrid ceramic replacement was irrelevant to the outcome. FOM damaged #5 within less than 500 miles of the replacement IMSB being fitted..So the engine is on it's 3rd IMSB even though no part of the IMS system was ever shown to be defective.  
Sometimes the cure is worse than.... 
Very difficult to make a useful generalization on the IMS problem other than the tolerance issues.Unless you can correlate the symptoms,diagnosis and outcomes you encourage people to gamble.Mileage is but one factor, driving style another but if you read Rennlist and this Forum carefully ,it is obvious there are many other issues.It is not random.And IMSB failure may not be the caused by the bearing . 
First, do no harm.Particularly to others.
		 
				 Last edited by Gelbster; 08-03-2017 at 11:30 AM.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  07-28-2017, 01:56 PM | #16 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Apr 2016 Location: Kosice 
					Posts: 15
				 | 
			i have  206 000 km original  IMS
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  07-29-2017, 04:32 AM | #17 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Ohio 
					Posts: 868
				      | 
			Sixty K on the original IMS.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  08-02-2017, 10:35 PM | #18 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: Peoples Republic of Kaliforneea 
					Posts: 686
				      | 
			02 base, 88k miles and owned since new.  40+ track days, no IMS
		 
				__________________02 Boxster  (DD sans kids)
 03 Dodge Ram Quad Cab (Stuff hauler)
 06 Maserati Coupe Cambiocorsa (Personal weekend car)
 06 Maserati Quattroporte (Family hauler)
 08 Corvette Z06 (Track car)
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  08-03-2017, 10:48 AM | #19 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Jul 2012 Location: New Hope, PA 
					Posts: 191
				      | 
			'01S 43K miles. Replaced single row IMS with LN Single Row Pro @ 40K when replacing the leaky RMS.  The IMS was sealed and original, full of dirty engine oil and no grease.  Peace of mind is wonderful.
		 
				__________________'01 986S
 ‘07 GT3
 '80 911SC Weissach Edition (Sold)
 ‘11 958 S
 https://dergarage.com
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  08-04-2017, 11:03 AM | #20 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Oct 2016 Location: Chicago 
					Posts: 13
				      | 
			2003 S with original IMS at 67k miles
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
	
	| Thread Tools |  
	|  |  
	| Display Modes |  
	
	| 
		
		 Hybrid Mode |  
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is On 
 |  |  |  All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:15 PM. 
	
	
		
	
	
 |  |