Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Boxster General Discussions

View Poll Results: Prefered 986 engine.
2.5 5 13.16%
2.7 9 23.68%
3.2 24 63.16%
Voters: 38. You may not vote on this poll

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-26-2014, 04:01 PM   #1
Registered User
 
BIGJake111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Greenville, S.C.
Posts: 2,670
Garage
Preferred Engine? (poll)

Of the factory engines what is everyone's favorite model!

I love my 3.2 but for the sake of value and no worries fun my vote is on the 2.5.

BIGJake111 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2014, 04:55 PM   #2
Registered User
 
Porsche9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 1,796
3.2 - more power is almost always better.
__________________
03 Carrera
02 Boxster S Guards Red, black interior with matching hardtop
89 Carrera 4
89 944 S2
78 911SC
Porsche9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2014, 05:14 PM   #3
Registered User
 
Pdwight's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: North Alabama
Posts: 2,079
No replacement for Displacement
Pdwight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2014, 06:17 PM   #4
Hawaiian Driver
 
Hawaiian Driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Maui
Posts: 58
More power more fun, no two ways about it!
__________________
2005 Boxster S 6 Speed
Hawaiian Driver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2014, 07:00 PM   #5
Registered User
 
golonaus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: chi-town
Posts: 328
Garage
3.4 transplant
__________________
99' with 3.4l engine. ROW tune. SAI delete
golonaus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2014, 07:25 PM   #6
Registered User
 
Giller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Listowel, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,120
At the end of the day, they are both excellent motors for the size and weight of the car and will put a smile on your face every day you go for a spin.
__________________
2011 Boxster 987.2 Arctic silver / Black leather, PDK with Sports Chrono Package Plus
Giller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2014, 07:46 PM   #7
Registered User
 
rp17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: DFW
Posts: 713
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pdwight View Post
No replacement for Displacement
+1 on that. Where do I vote for the 3.8?
__________________
What we're dealing with here is a complete lack of respect for the law.
rp17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2014, 07:51 PM   #8
Registered User
 
Joe B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Jackson Hole, Wyoming
Posts: 800
My favorite engine is the one in my car .
Joe B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2014, 07:55 PM   #9
Registered User
 
Pdwight's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: North Alabama
Posts: 2,079
Man I wish I had a 3.8 with a big fat torque curve....actually I thin about 350 WHP would be perfect in these cars.
Pdwight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2014, 08:46 PM   #10
On the slippery slope
 
JayG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Austin and Palm Springs
Posts: 3,794
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by BIGJake111 View Post
Of the factory engines what is everyone's favorite model!

I love my 3.2 but for the sake of value and no worries fun my vote is on the 2.5.
how is the 2.5 no worries vs the 3.2?
__________________
2004 Boxster S 6 speed - DRL relay hack, Polaris AutoTop DIY
2004 996 Targa Tip
Instructor - San Diego region
2014 Porsche Performance Driving School
2020 BMW X3, 2013 Ram 1500, 2016 Cmax, 2004 F-150 "Big Red"
JayG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2014, 10:23 PM   #11
Registered User
 
Pominoz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 136
Weight a minute

Well I've got a 2.7 so of course I voted for that

I know someone with a Boxster S who says that the 2.7 base handles better than the S due to it's lighter weight.

Boxster 2.5 = 1252 Kg
Boxster 2.7 = 1260 Kg
Boxster S = 1320 Kg

In the S compared to the 2.7, you may have more power, but you've also got your girlfriend in the car with you, which is really not going to help with fast cornering

I'd say the 2.7 base may be the best compromise, unless you are into drag racing. However, I've never driven an S, and I should probably avoid trying one just in case
__________________
Boxster Base, 2002 Manual, Black.
LN Single Row Pro IMS retrofit.
Pominoz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2014, 03:33 AM   #12
Registered User
 
BIGJake111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Greenville, S.C.
Posts: 2,670
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by rp17 View Post
+1 on that. Where do I vote for the 3.8?

I didn't want all the votes in the same place haha!
BIGJake111 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2014, 03:34 AM   #13
Registered User
 
BIGJake111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Greenville, S.C.
Posts: 2,670
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by JayG View Post
how is the 2.5 no worries vs the 3.2?

An extent of expendability with some 2.5 cars worth less than they would be parted out.
BIGJake111 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2014, 04:03 AM   #14
Registered User
 
kk2002s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: S. New Jersey
Posts: 1,239
Garage
I have nothing to compare other than 3.2
Even with the 3.2, the car is capable of more hp and torque and would make it a 911 killer
__________________
2002 S - old school third pedal
Seal Grey
kk2002s is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2014, 05:10 AM   #15
Registered User
 
jsceash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,466
Garage
I have tracked a 2003 Boxster since 2009. After a ton of modifications on a 2.7, I could keep up to a fairly stock 3.2 Boxster S in all the tight sections on a road coarse. A 100 feet into a straight they would be pulling away Because I could not get the same torque. Slowly I could catch back up if the straight was long enough into braking again keeping up in the tight sections. Frustrating!
__________________
2003 Black 986. modified for Advanced level HPDE and open track days.
* 3.6L LN block, 06 heads, Carrillo H rods, IDP with 987 intake, Oil mods, LN IMS. * Spec II Clutch, 3.2L S Spec P-P FW. * D2 shocks, GT3 arms & and links, Spacers front and rear * Weight reduced, No carpet, AC deleted, Remote PS pump, PS pump deleted. Recaro Pole position seats, Brey crouse ext. 5 point harness, NHP sport exhaust
jsceash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2014, 06:17 AM   #16
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 524
My vote will always be for larger displacement (more power). I think most of us here are always looking for more power.

Within my family we have 4 Boxsters.
2002 S 3.2 Tip - My Wife
2003 Base 2.7 Tip - Brother
2003 S 3.2 Manual - Son in law
2008 S 3.4 303HP Manual

The 1st Boxster I ever drove was the 2003 Base. This is how I got hooked on the Boxster and I had to have one. Only disappointment at that time was because it was a Tip. I bought my 1st Boxster a year later but it had to be a Tip so my wife can drive it. I was happy with the power increase but still something was missing (Manual). My Son in-law decided he wanted one and he bought a 2003 S manual. After driving his car I had to have one with a manual trans. I ended up buying a late 2008 model with 303 HP. Having owned this I really didn't care to drive the previous models anymore. I ended up giving my 2002 S to my son and he uses this as a daily driver. It now has 160k miles.

Now I'd like to get my hands on a GTS

__________________
2008 Boxster S PDE2
02 Boxster S Blk on Blk(Stock for the Wife)
88 turbo S (My Toy) slightly modified
cas951 is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page