10-07-2014, 02:13 PM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 583
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rock88hard
|
Yes, hard to put in. Keep an eye on your CEL - if you get one for MAF, re-set CEL and put a stock filter back in.
__________________
2000 S - Borla Exhaust, TS Cat Deletes, RSS UDP, B&M Short Shift, T96 Steering Wheel, Potenza RE-71R's,
Mantis 2.0L Deep Sump, de-snorkeled, Bilstein PSS9 Coil-Overs, Rennline lug studs, and auto crossed regularly.
|
|
|
10-07-2014, 02:34 PM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Dahlonega , Georgia
Posts: 1,350
|
Just in case you didn't know the K&N's flow more air because they flow more dirt !
__________________
2002 Boxster S Arctic Silver with black top with glass window and black leather interior. Jake Raby 3.6 SS ( the beast ) with IMS Solution. 996 GT3 front bumper , GT3 rocker covers and GT3TEK rear diffuser and Joe Toth composites rear ducktail spoiler .
|
|
|
10-07-2014, 06:27 PM
|
#4
|
Multi-Boxer Driver
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Orange Park, FL
Posts: 1,424
|
Stick with paper, replace often.
__________________
-Chris
2004 Porsche Boxster 2.7 (gone  )
2004 Porsche 911 C4S Cab
1991 Porsche 911 C2 Targa 3.6
2017 Subaru Outback 3.6R
|
|
|
10-08-2014, 01:01 AM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Chicago
Posts: 329
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rock88hard
|
Yup, also make sure the filter doesn't have too much "filter oil" on it. For mine I just placed it on top of a towel and sprayed some air to rinse out all the excess oil on it.
__________________
'99 Porsche Boxster 986 - weekend car
'04 BMW 645ci e63 - daily driver
'98 BMW 528i e39 - dog carrier
|
|
|
10-08-2014, 07:29 AM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,466
|
I believe the K&N style filters have gotten a bad wrap because of users who are not willing to follow maintenance requirements. I have used them on almost every car I have ever owned. 5 years in a 2003 Boxster never had a MAF code. Statistic's show they flow more air and clean better than paper filters with the added bonus of longer life. The catch you have to be willing to clean and maintain them.
If you believe you can install and forget this filter like your paper filter. stay with a paper filter.
__________________
2003 Black 986. modified for Advanced level HPDE and open track days.
* 3.6L LN block, 06 heads, Carrillo H rods, IDP with 987 intake, Oil mods, LN IMS. * Spec II Clutch, 3.2L S Spec P-P FW. * D2 shocks, GT3 arms & and links, Spacers front and rear * Weight reduced, No carpet, AC deleted, Remote PS pump, PS pump deleted. Recaro Pole position seats, Brey crouse ext. 5 point harness, NHP sport exhaust
|
|
|
10-08-2014, 07:39 AM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,656
|
Start saving for a new MAF...
|
|
|
10-08-2014, 01:46 PM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Ohio
Posts: 868
|
+1 For Paper
A new paper filter once a year.
|
|
|
10-08-2014, 02:50 PM
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Guelph, ON
Posts: 981
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsceash
I believe the K&N style filters have gotten a bad wrap because of users who are not willing to follow maintenance requirements. I have used them on almost every car I have ever owned. 5 years in a 2003 Boxster never had a MAF code. Statistic's show they flow more air and clean better than paper filters with the added bonus of longer life. The catch you have to be willing to clean and maintain them.
If you believe you can install and forget this filter like your paper filter. stay with a paper filter.
|
I agree with you... and if you over-oil the k&n a little, just use a little MAF cleaner to spray down the sensor and clean it and 'Bob is your Uncle' all good till next oil change. I've been using K&N for years in my cars, bikes etc and never an issue so far.
H
__________________
_________________________________________
Previously owned:
2000 Boxster S 3.2 Ocean Blue / 1974 911 Targa Silver
|
|
|
10-08-2014, 03:28 PM
|
#10
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,022
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsceash
I believe the K&N style filters have gotten a bad wrap because of users who are not willing to follow maintenance requirements. I have used them on almost every car I have ever owned. 5 years in a 2003 Boxster never had a MAF code. Statistic's show they flow more air and clean better than paper filters with the added bonus of longer life. The catch you have to be willing to clean and maintain them.
If you believe you can install and forget this filter like your paper filter. stay with a paper filter.
|
Though I've not personally used K&N filters, over the years on this forum I've read the posts of several diehard users who agree with this sentiment. They submit that, properly prepared and maintained, these filters do a good job. Me? I'm lazy...or, perhaps more accurately, have far too many other things on my "ToDo" list---I use the paper ones.
|
|
|
10-09-2014, 12:27 PM
|
#11
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Albuquerque, NM, USA
Posts: 743
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rfuerst911sc
Just in case you didn't know the K&N's flow more air because they flow more dirt !
|
The latter is true, but ...
In the BMW motorcycle world a techie guy with instrumentation compared airflow between
Stock paper filter
Stock filter half blocked off
K&N
No filter at all
There was no airflow difference.
Difficult fit is not surprising, as K&N is not a quality product and fit is dubious on many rectangular versions. If you have a 4-barrel with a round filter around it, K&N will fit.
It's a product that is 100% hype.
__________________
Kent Christensen
Albuquerque
2001 Boxster
2007 GL320 CDI, 2010 CL550
2 BMW motorcycles
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:26 AM.
| |