05-20-2014, 12:44 PM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Greenville, S.C.
Posts: 2,670
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Youngbill
First Post! Hello All!!
So I'm buying myself a Boxster for my 40th birthday and I've budgeted 40K (Out the door price) for the purchase. I was hoping the knowledgeable folks on this board could help me with a few decisions. I'm thinking I want to stick with a 2009 or newer to avoid any IMS issues. So I'm wondering.......
2009 "S" with more miles vs 2010+ "Non-S" with less miles?
Also, what are your thoughts on CPO?
Thank you for your input. I can't wait to be part of the Boxster club!
Bill
|
Personally i would suggest getting a 911 engine converted 986 for the money, you can have the bearing replaced with one that shouldn't fail.
However, sticking to your original suggestion, i would go with one that isn't an S if it means a warranty, if both cars are out of warranty then your are better off with the S.
|
|
|
05-20-2014, 12:50 PM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Socal
Posts: 560
|
I'd say get the S .
One word of warning ...
Cpo can only be transferred if you buy from a porsche dealer or private party .
Beware of any car advertised as Cpo that are at "other brands" dealers .
You'll be amazed how many Cpo cars get traded for other brands , then that dealership advertises them as Cpo ....
|
|
|
05-20-2014, 01:35 PM
|
#3
|
Usercpy
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 205
|
Go for S,
"Non S" is fast enough, but after a while, you always want more power....
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/flickr_ching/
|
|
|
05-20-2014, 02:21 PM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 8,709
|
When it comes to Porsches always go for the S if you can.
Adding power later is very costly with this brand. And the extra oomph is very handy when merging on the highway and overtkaing all manner of sedans and SUVs that now have considerably more power than 15-20 years ago. When the Boxster first came out the M3 was a ~250 HP car.
If you intended to only use it for track/autox, the base is plenty enough power to get you up a tree.
Conventional wisdom thinks its the other way around. The bigger power car for the track, smaller for the street.
They have that backwards in my opinion.
2009 is the way to go, not really because of the IMS, but because it's the next engine regime.
Addressing the IMS is simply a day at the shop, costly but not take out the engine costly.
a 2000-2004 S is probably the best value in my opinion. The 2009-2012 is a faster car but I didn't feel it was fast enough to justify the delta while in-warranty.
But now that the 2009 cars are off warranty the prices should start to dipping hard soon a.k.a the second big wave of depreciation.
__________________
GT3 Recaro Seats - Boxster Red
GT3 Aero / Carrera 18" 5 spoke / Potenza RE-11
Fabspeed Headers & Noise Maker
BORN: March 2000 - FINLAND
IMS#1 REPLACED: April 2010 - NEW JERSEY -- LNE DUAL ROW
Last edited by Perfectlap; 05-20-2014 at 02:33 PM.
|
|
|
05-20-2014, 02:49 PM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Marin, California
Posts: 243
|
When in doubt go with the "S". That said test drive both a 986 S and a 987 S. People tend to have rather strong feelings about which generation they prefer (due to size, performance, interior design, etc).
I personally like the looks for the 986 more. While the 987 has more ummph, it wouldn't be enough to have me dish out more money above a 986 S. The only 987 Boxster that makes me weak in the knees is the Spyder, but those aren't at their second round of depreciation yet.
Happy hunting.
|
|
|
05-20-2014, 03:44 PM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Greenville, S.C.
Posts: 2,670
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RaisedOnPorsches
When in doubt go with the "S". That said test drive both a 986 S and a 987 S. People tend to have rather strong feelings about which generation they prefer (due to size, performance, interior design, etc).
I personally like the looks for the 986 more. While the 987 has more ummph, it wouldn't be enough to have me dish out more money above a 986 S. The only 987 Boxster that makes me weak in the knees is the Spyder, but those aren't at their second round of depreciation yet.
Happy hunting.
|
I wonder if the spyder will depreciate, I saw one for more than a new base, and the car had 20k miles on it.
But I agree with the others on at least looking at a 986, as they said, the ims is an easy fix with a budget that large. Not only is it cheaper up front but I wouldn't expect much depreciation on the 986 over a few thousand from now to 5 years down the road. Which you could possibly even afford a 911 engine swap on a 986 if you really want power. Many would argue this is the perfect boxster combo with its light weight and purpose built interior.
Sent from my iPod touch using Tapatalk
|
|
|
05-20-2014, 04:33 PM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Little Rock,Ar
Posts: 357
|
I have an S and I'm very glad.The extra low end torque makes merging etc a lot more fun.
I've always tried to buy the strongest.My MINI Cooper S and Mustang GT were my previous cars.
Each had the strong drive train.
__________________
2000 Boxster S. Factory hardtop. 6 speed. Arctic Silver. Boxster Red leather. IMS/RMS.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:09 PM.
| |