Quote:
Originally Posted by ekam
|
All this sounds completely plausible to me. Nine year old tires? Not good.
It reads to me that no party involved in this incident did anything wrong. And please.............don't harp on the "doing 90 in a 45" BS.
With everyone being absolved, perhaps this unfortunate "accident" (a term that doesn't seem to exist anymore in today's litigious climate), was the result of "maintenance negligence".
Just sayin'..............
TO