Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Performance and Technical Chat

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-21-2013, 09:12 AM   #1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 147
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikefocke View Post
Is the IMS bearing submerged? I thought I had been told it was mist lubricated.
The only time the IMS would be lubricated by mist would be if the engine is suffering from oil starvation. The IMS is located well below the where the oil level sits during normal operation in the integrated dry sump (i.e. wet sump).
__________________
Charles Navarro
President, LN Engineering and Bilt Racing Service
http://www.LNengineering.com
Home of Nickies, IMS Retrofit, and IMS Solution
cnavarro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2013, 10:45 AM   #2
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 598
Charles, the successful history of your ceramic bearing upgrade is precisely why I recommend the same for all except: 1. those with unlimited budgets, for whom I suspect that the LN Solution would be the way to go (in spite of the relative lack of vehicles on road to prove the technology); 2. those with the large single bearing who cannot upgrade the bearing without an engine tear-down. For those I would suggest that DOF lubrication of the original bearing, even if there are minor risks of aeration and oil pressure loss, would be better than leaving in the original bearing and hoping that it lasts now with just the removal of a seal.

I wonder, however, if a dual standard is not at play here. When LN introduced the ceramic bearing upgrade, customers installed the same even though they had not yet been proven in large numbers over a long period of time. They were convinced by the initial testing and the inherent logic of the design - something which you and others are now suggesting would be inappropriate for prospective customers of DOF technology. What is more, your new 'solution' is also not supported by a large number of installations over long periods of time. To remain logically consistent, doesn't that mean that the upgrade should also be preferrred to the solution because of its proven track record?

Brad

Last edited by southernstar; 10-21-2013 at 10:46 AM. Reason: sp
southernstar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2013, 02:17 PM   #3
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Texarkana, Texas
Posts: 959
Quote:
Originally Posted by cnavarro View Post
The IMS is located well below the where the oil level sits during normal operation in the integrated dry sump (i.e. wet sump).
In this discussion we've tried to focus on facts and what has been proven through testing. I believe this view though that the IMS bearing is well lubricated without the seal through oil bath or splash lubrication is an assumption not based on actual testing. It would be pretty hard to measure, but I don't think the actual sump level has been measured through the dynamic loads that a car would see during normal driving. I would like to see any data that has been collected, if this has been done.

As such, I personally do not hold to this assumption that the bearing will see adequate lubrication with simply the seal removed. What I have seen, on the contrary, points to mediocre lubrication at best. Seeing is believing though and this is what I have seen, stolen from Feelyx on Pelican Parts:



The intermediate shaft sits up relatively tight against the engine case, allowing just a small slit for oil to get through to lubricate it from the sump below. Some oil will fall off the chain from above, but will still need to get through this small slit. This picture does not show the cover that would further block flow of oil through splash lubrication to the bearing.





Some more pictures of different views further illustrating this point.

So, would I depend on splash lubrication for this critical bearing? Absolutely not!

But what about oil bath lubrication? Maybe the bearing is partially submerged...





These photos from Feelyx again show where the oil bath is located. Obviously the chain was designed by Porsche to be lubricated by an oil bath. The IMS bearing was not.

So how much oil does the bearing get then if you just remove the seal? The truth is that we don't really know. LN Engineering "assumes" that it is enough. I personally look at the location of the bearing and I do not come to that same conclusion. Instead, what I am willing to bet on is having a good, consistent flow of oil directly to the bearing - direct oil feed. With DOF there is no guessing, no assumptions, you KNOW the bearing is going to get enough oil regardless of how much oil is in the sump and regardless of vehicle dynamics (hard braking, hard cornering, etc.). With a very expensive engine on the line and a car that I love, I am going to trust something that is a lot more certain and consistent - direct oil feed. This is why I've been such a big proponent of the DOF system - it just makes sense to me!

Kirk Bristol
__________________
2000 Boxster S - Gemballa body kit, GT3 front bumper, JRZ coilovers, lower stress bars
2003 911 Carrera 4S - TechArt body kit, TechArt coilovers, HRE wheels
1986 911 Carrera Targa - 3.2L, Euro pistons, 964 cams, steel slant nose widebody
1975 911S Targa - undergoing a full restoration and engine rebuild
Also In The Garage - '66 912, '69 912, '72 914 Chalon wide body, '73 914
Kirk is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page