Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Boxster General Discussions

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-13-2020, 09:12 AM   #1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: North Cali
Posts: 745
Garage
Crank case bolts tightening sequence

Hi All,

I`m assembling the engine housing and I was wondering if anyone knows the crank case/engine halves-bolts tightening sequence, I assume there`s a specific pattern but I couldn`t find anything about it on the web. Thanks!


Last edited by Homeoboxter; 03-13-2020 at 10:51 AM.
Homeoboxter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2020, 09:54 AM   #2
1998 Boxster Silver/Red
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: 92262
Posts: 2,920
Quote:
Originally Posted by Homeoboxter View Post
Hi All,

I`m assembling the crankcases and I was wondering if anyone knows the crank case bolts tightening sequence, I assume there`s a specific pattern but I couldn`t find anything about it on the web. Thanks!
I found it in .69 seconds... running a general Google inquiry: 986 Boxster crankcase bolts tightening sequence

https://www.google.com/search?q=986+boxster+crankcase+bolts+tightening+se quence&rlz=1C1CHWL_enUS826US826&oq=986+boxster+crankcase+bolts+tightening+sequence&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i60.6290j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

Hope it helps.
__________________
1998 Porsche Boxster
Starter986 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2020, 10:47 AM   #3
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: North Cali
Posts: 745
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Starter986 View Post
Yeah, this part is done already and I found these too. Sorry, I wasn`t clear, I meant the engine case halves, not the main bearing housing, or carrier. They are bolted with a bunch of M6 bolts.
Homeoboxter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2020, 10:53 AM   #4
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: North Cali
Posts: 745
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Starter986 View Post
I rephrased the post, I hope it`s more clear now.
Homeoboxter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2020, 12:18 PM   #5
Motorist & Coffee Drinker
 
78F350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 3,665
Garage
Is this what you want? Note: I will probably delete these pics from Flickr after a day or two.





Oops, left off the last pic when I first posted:
__________________
I am not an attorney, mechanic, or member of the clergy. Following any advice given in my posts is done at your own peril.

Last edited by 78F350; 03-13-2020 at 01:48 PM. Reason: added third pic
78F350 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2020, 01:32 PM   #6
1998 Boxster Silver/Red
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: 92262
Posts: 2,920
HB, it looks like you've been pointed in the right direction by one of our wiser-minds.

Best wishes getting all together!
__________________
1998 Porsche Boxster
Starter986 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2020, 03:40 PM   #7
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: North Cali
Posts: 745
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by 78F350 View Post
Is this what you want? Note: I will probably delete these pics from Flickr after a day or two.





Oops, left off the last pic when I first posted:
Exactly, thanks!
The manual mentions an illustration of where exactly to apply the silicone bead, can you post that too if possible? How can you get this manual btw? Thanks again.
Homeoboxter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2020, 03:42 PM   #8
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: North Cali
Posts: 745
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Starter986 View Post
HB, it looks like you've been pointed in the right direction by one of our wiser-minds.

Best wishes getting all together!
Yep! Thanks!
Homeoboxter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2020, 04:18 PM   #9
Motorist & Coffee Drinker
 
78F350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 3,665
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Homeoboxter View Post
Exactly, thanks!
The manual mentions an illustration of where exactly to apply the silicone bead, can you post that too if possible? How can you get this manual btw? Thanks again.
I'll find/post the other illustration tomorrow.
I found my set of manuals on local Craigslist about five years ago. There's usually a couple on eBay, but its not cheap:

https://www.ebay.com/itm/1997-99-Boxster-Boxster-S-Factory-Workshop-Manuals/283699713245?hash=item420dd214dd:g:ZZEAAOSwGIVd6Em 3

There's also some copies that you can download scattered across the internet. Porsche stopped updating this version years ago, but for most tasks it's the best source of info, outside of having a dealership subscription.
__________________
I am not an attorney, mechanic, or member of the clergy. Following any advice given in my posts is done at your own peril.
78F350 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2020, 08:05 PM   #10
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: North Cali
Posts: 745
Garage
That`s insane. Thanks for posting the illustration, I appreciate it.
Homeoboxter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2020, 08:31 PM   #11
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: North Cali
Posts: 745
Garage
Nevermind, I found it. It`s for the 987 but it`s the same I guess.

Homeoboxter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2020, 09:13 PM   #12
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: North Cali
Posts: 745
Garage
Oh, I found it in a Rennlist thread, just in case someone else needs it, I hope the original poster wouldn`t mind.
https://rennlist.com/forums/987-981-forum/1118163-does-anyone-have-a-really-good-987-repair-manual-they-can-recommend.html
Homeoboxter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2020, 12:03 AM   #13
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: North Cali
Posts: 745
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by 78F350 View Post
I'll find/post the other illustration tomorrow.
I found my set of manuals on local Craigslist about five years ago. There's usually a couple on eBay, but its not cheap:

https://www.ebay.com/itm/1997-99-Boxster-Boxster-S-Factory-Workshop-Manuals/283699713245?hash=item420dd214dd:g:ZZEAAOSwGIVd6Em 3

There's also some copies that you can download scattered across the internet. Porsche stopped updating this version years ago, but for most tasks it's the best source of info, outside of having a dealership subscription.
Now that I`m looking at this 987 factory manual, looks like the connecting rod specs are different from what I used on my 2.5 engine. I have a chart with all torque settings that I found here on the forum, and it was a bit confusing because there were two angles listed, 90 and 110 degrees after the 20Nm tightening, I had a thread about it a few weeks back. If you still have the chance, would you mind looking at the conrod bolt tightening specs in your manual? Unfortunately I couldn`t find the manual for the 2.5 Boxster. Thank you for your time!
Homeoboxter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2020, 05:19 AM   #14
Motorist & Coffee Drinker
 
78F350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 3,665
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Homeoboxter View Post
Now that I`m looking at this 987 factory manual, looks like the connecting rod specs are different from what I used on my 2.5 engine. I have a chart with all torque settings that I found here on the forum, and it was a bit confusing because there were two angles listed, 90 and 110 degrees after the 20Nm tightening, I had a thread about it a few weeks back. If you still have the chance, would you mind looking at the conrod bolt tightening specs in your manual? Unfortunately I couldn`t find the manual for the 2.5 Boxster. Thank you for your time!
For the silicone bead, my manual shows the same path, but mirror image (opposite side).

For the rod bolts on a 2.5L, I expect that 90* is fine, but:

There is a table that shows all the engine bolt torques for the M96/20 2.5L, M96/21 3.2L, and M96/22 2.7L supplement 42 dated from 2000 says,
"Connecting rod screws with connecting-rod designation...7R
Initial tightening: 20 (15)
Final tightening: 1x90*

Connecting rod screws with connecting-rod designation...7R
Initial tightening: 20 (15)
Final tightening: 1x110*"

(yes, it says the same thing for both sections except for the final tightening. Is the 7R a typo in one of them?)
__________________________________

There is a table that shows all the engine bolt torques for the M96/23 2.7L and M96/24 3.2L supplement 64 dated from 2003 says, "Con-rod bolts (replace): initial tightening + final tightening || 20 (15) + 110* torque angle."
__________________________________

In the section that details the work, supplement 18 printed in 1998, it says:
(following initial tightening to 20 NM)
"2. Final tightening 1 x 90* turn"
__________________
I am not an attorney, mechanic, or member of the clergy. Following any advice given in my posts is done at your own peril.
78F350 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2020, 08:25 AM   #15
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: North Cali
Posts: 745
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by 78F350 View Post
For the silicone bead, my manual shows the same path, but mirror image (opposite side).

For the rod bolts on a 2.5L, I expect that 90* is fine, but:

There is a table that shows all the engine bolt torques for the M96/20 2.5L, M96/21 3.2L, and M96/22 2.7L supplement 42 dated from 2000 says,
"Connecting rod screws with connecting-rod designation...7R
Initial tightening: 20 (15)
Final tightening: 1x90*

Connecting rod screws with connecting-rod designation...7R
Initial tightening: 20 (15)
Final tightening: 1x110*"

(yes, it says the same thing for both sections except for the final tightening. Is the 7R a typo in one of them?)
__________________________________

There is a table that shows all the engine bolt torques for the M96/23 2.7L and M96/24 3.2L supplement 64 dated from 2003 says, "Con-rod bolts (replace): initial tightening + final tightening || 20 (15) + 110* torque angle."
__________________________________

In the section that details the work, supplement 18 printed in 1998, it says:
(following initial tightening to 20 NM)
"2. Final tightening 1 x 90* turn"


Thanks. Yes, it`s the same confusion regarding "7R" that we tried to disentangle in a previous thread. Strange though, because I think the 2.5 and 2.7 rod bolts are the same (at least they are listed for all years), but the newer models` bolts need 110*. So they just increased the clamping force (from 90 to 110) in the newer models without changing the bolts?

Also, the 987 manual`s respective section says the bolts should be angle-tightened twice:

"First, screw in connecting rod bolts to the required torque and tighten to the specified torque angle. Then loosen the bolts again. The final tightening is performed again with an initial tightening per the torque and the concluding tightening is performed with the torque angle wrench. --> Initial tightening: 20 (15 ftlb.) Nm ; -->
Torque angle, final tightening: 110 ° "

What a mess.

Homeoboxter is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page