Boxster piston ring end gaps?

[BYprodriver]

Originally Posted by Homeoboxter

Yes, the bore size both for the 2.7 and the 2.5 should be 85.5 mm, so rings listed for the 2.7L should be ok for the 2.5L, unless I`m missing something else.

You should measure the cylinder bore's for wear, if they are worn beyond spec you should probably reinstall the original conforming rings in their original positions.

[Homeoboxter]

Originally Posted by BYprodriver

You should measure the cylinder bore's for wear, if they are worn beyond spec you should probably reinstall the original conforming rings in their original positions.

Well, I don`t know the specs and I don`t have precise tools to measure the wear. The bores show no sign of wear by feel and the ring gaps do not change much when I slide the ring all the way down the bore, and there`s no difference if I place the ring to the top of the bore (the area that the ring normally does not reach) vs. if I slide it down. So I assume the wear is not substantial. I think the compression rings could be reused, my worry is about the oil rings, the side rails seem deteriorated, I can see through between the cylinder wall and the side rail when I place them into the bore.

[maytag]

Originally Posted by Homeoboxter

Well, I don`t know the specs and I don`t have precise tools to measure the wear. The bores show no sign of wear by feel and the ring gaps do not change much when I slide the ring all the way down the bore, and there`s no difference if I place the ring to the top of the bore (the area that the ring normally does not reach) vs. if I slide it down. So I assume the wear is not substantial. I think the compression rings could be reused, my worry is about the oil rings, the side rails seem deteriorated, I can see through between the cylinder wall and the side rail when I place them into the bore.

Ohhh.... i'd probably back the bus up abit, if I were you. At least lay on the brake some...
If you're trying to do this even partially "right", you shouldn't be letting $100 worth of snap gauges and a caliper stop you. Take your time, do it right. You'll be glad you did.

Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk

[Homeoboxter]

Originally Posted by maytag

Ohhh.... i'd probably back the bus up abit, if I were you. At least lay on the brake some...
If you're trying to do this even partially "right", you shouldn't be letting $100 worth of snap gauges and a caliper stop you. Take your time, do it right. You'll be glad you did.

Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk

I do have a caliper and snap gauges, but those are useless to measure cylinder wear. For that you need a bore gauge, and you are right, they are actually much cheaper than I remembered, so I might go ahead and invest into buying one or just take the cases to a machine shop and get them measured. Still, I don`t know the tolerance values for the bore, not even sure if they were released by Porsche.

[Homeoboxter]

This would do it, for sure no machine shop would measure the wear and ovality for me for this much:
https://www.amazon.com/Blesiya-50-160mm-Cylinder-Internal-Measuring/dp/B07K59JPYH/ref=sr_1_8?s=industrial&ie=UTF8&qid=1547515233&sr=1-8&keywords=bore+gauge+metric

[Homeoboxter]

I still don`t know if the 2.5L and 2.7L piston rings are interchangable. Based on the dimensions (bore size and thickness) they should be identical. However, the sellers say the 2.7L rings won`t fit my 2.5L engine based on the catalog. Am I still missing something here? I already posted some info about the ring end gap measurements in my show&tell gallery and asked the same question there: http://986forum.com/forums/show-tell-gallery/73917-blue-boxster-resurrection-project.html
Perhaps more people read this thread and there`s somebody out there who has seen both of these engines apart and know the answer? Thanks!

[Ottomotion]

Dial the dealer?

Post up on Rennlist?