Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Boxster General Discussions

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-29-2016, 05:33 PM   #1
Registered User
 
fullthrottle52's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 245
Need help with VIN

I am looking at a 2005 Boxster S for sale. It is my understanding that the early build 2005's had the single row small IMS bearing. Later build dates had the larger less vulnerable bearing. Can anyone tell me if VIN: WP0CB29805U732088 is a earlier build or later in the run. Is there a place I can put in a vin # in and get a build sheet? Thanks for any help.

__________________
2000 Boxster - Loved and sold
1999 911 Cabriolet - Also loved and sold.
fullthrottle52 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2016, 06:52 PM   #2
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Minnesnowta
Posts: 90
If the car has more than 50,000 miles, you are more-than-likely past the point where you would have to worry about an IMS failure. Near as I can tell in my research, nearly all IMS disasters happened at less than 50,000 miles.
FauxDiablo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2016, 02:19 AM   #3
Registered User
 
kjc2050's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Wake Forest, NC
Posts: 867
Garage
2000 was the transition year, not 2005.
__________________
2000 Boxster S, 6 speed, Sport Package, Litronics, LED tail lights, LNE IMS-B, OBC, Skybreaker wind deflector, Arctic Silver/Graphite Grey
kjc2050 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2016, 03:23 AM   #4
Registered User
 
fullthrottle52's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 245
The car only has 24,000 miles, thus my concern. My research says that 2005 was the year that the IMS bearing was updated from a single row smaller bearing to a non-serviceable larger bearing that was less prone to fail. That is my quandary.

I have done a vin check on a source from this forum but only gives me an IN SERVICE date of 3/26/05. No build date. Does anyone know if the build date is on the window sticker?

Thanks for the responses.
__________________
2000 Boxster - Loved and sold
1999 911 Cabriolet - Also loved and sold.
fullthrottle52 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2016, 04:12 AM   #5
Registered User
 
Giller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Listowel, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,120
Quote:
Originally Posted by kjc2050 View Post
2000 was the transition year, not 2005.
False. 2005 is a transition year from a serviceable bearing to non-serviceable.
__________________
2011 Boxster 987.2 Arctic silver / Black leather, PDK with Sports Chrono Package Plus
Giller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2016, 04:13 AM   #6
Registered User
 
husker boxster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Omaha
Posts: 2,865
The build date is in the driver's door jamb. But it's only MM/YY.

Supposedly, rumor has it, don't quote me on this, I won't swear on a stack of Bibles, (I think that covers the disclaimer), Porsche had a supply of smaller bearing engines already built for the 2005 model yrs. Porsche ran their supply dry of smaller IMS engines somewhere in March 2005 and at that point started using the larger bearing IMS engines after that time. There are no records of when the change-over occurred so that's why it's speculation. I would hazard a guess if the In-Service date is late March, you would have the smaller bearing since the car had to be built, shipped, and in the dealer's inventory before the Mar 2005 cut-over.
__________________
GPRPCA Chief Driving Instructor
2008 Boxster S Limited Edition #005
2008 Cayman S Sport - Signal Green
1989 928 S4 5 spd - black
1987 928 S4 - Granite Green Metallic (Felsengrun)
husker boxster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2016, 04:43 AM   #7
Registered User
 
fullthrottle52's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 245
Husker, I had the same thoughts that this car was more than likely a early 2005 model. The person selling the car has no idea about the IMS issues and is asking a premium price for it. I will probably pass because you can never educate these owners on replacing the bearing and the costs associated with it. He will end up selling it to another unknowing person, who will probably drive it for 100,000 service free miles. ��
Why is it that we knowledgable folks can't bring ourselves to pay a premium price for a beautiful car that has the potential to explode?

Thanks for the help
__________________
2000 Boxster - Loved and sold
1999 911 Cabriolet - Also loved and sold.

Last edited by fullthrottle52; 08-30-2016 at 04:46 AM.
fullthrottle52 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2016, 04:46 AM   #8
Registered User
 
steved0x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: FL
Posts: 4,143
Build sheet:
https://admin.porschedealer.com/reports/build_sheets/print.php?vin=WP0CB29805U732088



Although I'm not sure if this helps with your IMS bearing question.

2000 was the transition year for the replaceable double row bearing to the replaceable single row bearing that had more failures. 2005 was the transition year from the smaller single row replaceable bearing to the larger non-replaceable (without splitting the engine case) single row bearing.

My guess is since this was built toward the end of the 2005 production run, it has the larger bearing, but I believe the only way to know for sure is to drop the transmission and look.
steved0x is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2016, 04:52 AM   #9
Registered User
 
fullthrottle52's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 245
Quote:
Originally Posted by steved0x View Post
Build sheet:
https://admin.porschedealer.com/reports/build_sheets/print.php?vin=WP0CB29805U732088



Although I'm not sure if this helps with your IMS bearing question.

2000 was the transition year for the replaceable double row bearing to the replaceable single row bearing that had more failures. 2005 was the transition year from the smaller single row replaceable bearing to the larger non-replaceable (without splitting the engine case) single row bearing.

My guess is since this was built toward the end of the 2005 production run, it has the larger bearing, but I believe the only way to know for sure is to drop the transmission and look.
Thanks Steve, this helps a lot. Unfortunately it is still a crap shoot.
__________________
2000 Boxster - Loved and sold
1999 911 Cabriolet - Also loved and sold.
fullthrottle52 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2016, 06:06 AM   #10
Registered User
 
husker boxster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Omaha
Posts: 2,865
With a build date of 06/05, it would certainly have the larger bearing. Looks like it wasn't sold until 10/05. Maybe the site that said it was in service in 03/05 was incorrect. With the larger bearing you would have a smaller chance of failure, but the extreme low mileage could still be an IMS red flag.

If the owner won't budge, maybe wait and see if he gets it sold. Convertible season is winding down so there will be less interest. He may be more motivated to sell next mo.
__________________
GPRPCA Chief Driving Instructor
2008 Boxster S Limited Edition #005
2008 Cayman S Sport - Signal Green
1989 928 S4 5 spd - black
1987 928 S4 - Granite Green Metallic (Felsengrun)
husker boxster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2016, 08:02 AM   #11
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: It's a kind of magic.....
Posts: 6,261
Quote:
Originally Posted by fullthrottle52 View Post
I am looking at a 2005 Boxster S for sale. It is my understanding that the early build 2005's had the single row small IMS bearing. Later build dates had the larger less vulnerable bearing. Can anyone tell me if VIN: WP0CB29805U732088 is a earlier build or later in the run. Is there a place I can put in a vin # in and get a build sheet? Thanks for any help.
From experience, there is no proven way to determine which type of IMS bearing is in a 2005 car (with its original engine) without taking the car apart and looking at it. We have seen early cars with the oversized bearing, and late cars with the serviceable bearing. 2005 cars are a total crapshoot as to which style they came with.
__________________
Anything really new is invented only in one’s youth. Later, one becomes more experienced, more famous – and more stupid.” - Albert Einstein
JFP in PA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2016, 08:06 AM   #12
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: It's a kind of magic.....
Posts: 6,261
Quote:
Originally Posted by kjc2050 View Post
2000 was the transition year, not 2005.
2000-2001 was the transitional period when they went from dual rows to single rows, but both are serviceable.
__________________
Anything really new is invented only in one’s youth. Later, one becomes more experienced, more famous – and more stupid.” - Albert Einstein
JFP in PA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2016, 09:04 AM   #13
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Winnipeg MB
Posts: 2,486
Quote:
Originally Posted by FauxDiablo View Post
If the car has more than 50,000 miles, you are more-than-likely past the point where you would have to worry about an IMS failure. Near as I can tell in my research, nearly all IMS disasters happened at less than 50,000 miles.
You know, if you don't know the answer then perhaps you should refrain from posting rather than spreading misinformation. Between this and your post about winter storage, you don't really seem to know what you're talking about.

Sorry dude, calling it as I see it.
__________________
'99 black 986
Mark_T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2016, 11:58 AM   #14
Registered User
 
Giller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Listowel, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,120
Quote:
Originally Posted by fullthrottle52 View Post
Husker, I had the same thoughts that this car was more than likely a early 2005 model. The person selling the car has no idea about the IMS issues and is asking a premium price for it. I will probably pass because you can never educate these owners on replacing the bearing and the costs associated with it. He will end up selling it to another unknowing person, who will probably drive it for 100,000 service free miles. ��
Why is it that we knowledgable folks can't bring ourselves to pay a premium price for a beautiful car that has the potential to explode?

Thanks for the help
And then there are many owners fully aware of the IMS issue - but chose to ignore it as it impacts only a small percentage.

Sometimes it's nothing to do with education, but owners who don't see the value in spending thousands when odds are greater then 90% that your IMS will be fine.
__________________
2011 Boxster 987.2 Arctic silver / Black leather, PDK with Sports Chrono Package Plus
Giller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2016, 04:39 PM   #15
Registered User
 
fullthrottle52's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 245
Quote:
Originally Posted by Giller View Post
And then there are many owners fully aware of the IMS issue - but chose to ignore it as it impacts only a small percentage.

Sometimes it's nothing to do with education, but owners who don't see the value in spending thousands when odds are greater then 90% that your IMS will be fine.
When you are paying $10,000 for a 5 year old Camry that is a good risk. If you are paying $25,000 for an 11 year old car with known (small percent agreed) issues, you are playing in a different league. My only issue in starting this thread was to see if the bearing in the car I was looking at is replaceable or not. I have to justify if paying a premium price and another $2,500 to replace this garage queen's bearing so I can drive with peace of mind. I have owned 2 early year water cooled Porshes and replaced both with L&N bearings for peace of mind. Others can ignore the issue if the want.
__________________
2000 Boxster - Loved and sold
1999 911 Cabriolet - Also loved and sold.
fullthrottle52 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2016, 05:38 PM   #16
Registered User
 
husker boxster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Omaha
Posts: 2,865
Based on the spec sheet Steve ran, it looks like it has great options and colors.

Assuming no mechanical issues, I've never minded paying a bit extra to get something I want. The enjoyment far outlasts the extra money spent.
__________________
GPRPCA Chief Driving Instructor
2008 Boxster S Limited Edition #005
2008 Cayman S Sport - Signal Green
1989 928 S4 5 spd - black
1987 928 S4 - Granite Green Metallic (Felsengrun)
husker boxster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2016, 06:17 PM   #17
Registered User
 
Giller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Listowel, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,120
Quote:
Originally Posted by fullthrottle52 View Post
When you are paying $10,000 for a 5 year old Camry that is a good risk. If you are paying $25,000 for an 11 year old car with known (small percent agreed) issues, you are playing in a different league. My only issue in starting this thread was to see if the bearing in the car I was looking at is replaceable or not. I have to justify if paying a premium price and another $2,500 to replace this garage queen's bearing so I can drive with peace of mind. I have owned 2 early year water cooled Porshes and replaced both with L&N bearings for peace of mind. Others can ignore the issue if the want.
And if you are that worried, why not spend that money on a newer model year where the IMS doesn't come into play? The price diff between model years is not all that much.

You can get a 2009 Boxster with 60,000km's for $40K Canadian through a Porsche dealership with CPO warranty. That's about $30,000 USD.....only $5000 more than what you are paying at $25....with no IMS worries.
__________________
2011 Boxster 987.2 Arctic silver / Black leather, PDK with Sports Chrono Package Plus

Last edited by Giller; 08-30-2016 at 06:19 PM.
Giller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2016, 07:31 PM   #18
Registered User
 
fullthrottle52's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 245
Quote:
Originally Posted by Giller View Post
And if you are that worried, why not spend that money on a newer model year where the IMS doesn't come into play? The price diff between model years is not all that much.

You can get a 2009 Boxster with 60,000km's for $40K Canadian through a Porsche dealership with CPO warranty. That's about $30,000 USD.....only $5000 more than what you are paying at $25....with no IMS worries.
I have been looking at newer models also and I agree that is an option.

Thanks for the input.

__________________
2000 Boxster - Loved and sold
1999 911 Cabriolet - Also loved and sold.
fullthrottle52 is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page