A place for my piece

[cfos]

Originally Posted by FoxRvrBox

The link from cfos is a story about a concealed carrier who tried to assist in an altercation and was killed ... it does not make peterbrowns point invalid - he is asking for a doucumented situation where a CC holder used his gun in anger, which this is clearly not.

Ah! My bad. Will this one meet the criteria? So many rules here... really kills the metaphors and possible-world semantics. But we must be accurate, or surely cfos will draw out something we say and poke fun at the grammar, innuendo, and general language used. That guy is such an ass.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/acts-of-faith/wp/2016/05/05/parishioner-shot-to-death-in-church-during-hymns-was-only-armed-with-his-bible-police-say/

I understand that the article above describes a "seating" incident - which does not DIRECTLY correlate to "standing on line" (pardon my regional grasp of dialect, I still, to this day prefer "on line" in place of "in line"), but in essence, I do feel that the whole argument arose from placement, some stupid argument, and well, anger. I guess... we will never know... for surely the argument would have been made that the result would have been the same had the guy brought a knife to a "bible fight". Am I right? And I'm sure, out there, somewhere, there are churchgoers that may/can be armed and do not shoot others. Is there an article about that?