Too many shops are treating the IMS Retrofit like a brake job, therefore retrofitting every engine that comes in the door.
I interfaced with over 600 technicians in the classes that I instruct last year alone. When I begin my IMS section of that class I ask for a showing of hands of those who carry out inspections to grade engine health prior to beginning an IMSR procedure.
All year I had 5 people raise their hands. The common complaint was "We aren't getting paid to do that, or to pull the sump plate, so why should we be doing it?"
My response was "To cover your ass, and to ensure that the customer isn't wasting his money on an engine that has another issue".
Its not about how many IMS jobs any shop has done, we've done more than anyone in the world, including the first one. We treat every one like its the first one, follow the same protocol, gather the same information and do the same testing. With numbers come a false sense of accomplishment thats a lot like riding a motorcycle for years. Once you think you have mastered it, it will show you who the boss is. Your scars can remind you later.
Experience is both good and bad.
__________________
Jake Raby/www.flat6innovations.com
IMS Solution/ Faultless Tool Inventor
US Patent 8,992,089 &
US Patent 9,416,697
Developer of The IMS Retrofit Procedure- M96/ M97 Specialist
Last edited by Jake Raby; 02-18-2014 at 10:47 AM.
|