11-27-2013, 02:49 AM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 68
|
IMS Solution installed
|
|
|
11-27-2013, 05:41 AM
|
#2
|
Engine Surgeon
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland GA USA
Posts: 2,425
|
Great! Which shop carried this installation out for you in Australia?
__________________
Jake Raby/www.flat6innovations.com
IMS Solution/ Faultless Tool Inventor
US Patent 8,992,089 &
US Patent 9,416,697
Developer of The IMS Retrofit Procedure- M96/ M97 Specialist
|
|
|
11-27-2013, 06:23 AM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Arlington Heights, IL
Posts: 1,561
|
Do bearings rotate the opposite direction in Australia?
|
|
|
11-27-2013, 07:19 AM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: ohio
Posts: 86
|
Yes, everything south of the equator rotates the other way.
|
|
|
11-27-2013, 08:39 AM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Torrance, California
Posts: 132
|
Jake, did your Excellence article on the IMS Solution come out yet?
I noticed the December issue is out but couldn't find the article.
__________________
1962 VW Beetle
1966 Triumph Spitfire
2003 Porsche Boxster S
2005 Ford F-150 Monster Truck
|
|
|
11-27-2013, 03:38 PM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Queensland, Australia
Posts: 1,522
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flavor 987S
Do bearings rotate the opposite direction in Australia?
|
Only when you hit reverse gear....You guys are such clowns, didn't they teach you anything in school
__________________
2001 Boxster S (triple black). Sleeping easier with LN Engineering/Flat 6 IMS upgrade, low temp thermostat & underspeed pulley.
2001 MV Agusta F4.
|
|
|
11-27-2013, 08:02 PM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Virginia
Posts: 353
|
Must be a relief to finally have this done.
Bust open that seal and let's see what the bearings themselves look like!
__________________
:ah:
|
|
|
11-28-2013, 03:23 AM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 68
|
Jake, the work was done by Weltmeister Porsche here in Melbourne, the largest independent Porsche service centre in this country (so they say). My car goes to them for routine service, and the previous owner took it to them as well. They tell me that they have done quite a few IMS Solution installations now, and in cars with the single-row bearing, they will install the Solution kit only.
And yes RawleyD, feeling rather relieved and happier to drive it. It even runs more smoothly (OK, I am dreaming?). Have not had time to open the bearing seals, but will do soon.
And to others with theories about the effects of gravity on this end of the planet, I recommend you come here for a holiday and find out for yourself. We have some great driving, among other attractions!
|
|
|
11-28-2013, 01:41 PM
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Tucson
Posts: 252
|
Im not a bearing expert but those pics look like its fine....
|
|
|
11-28-2013, 04:34 PM
|
#10
|
Engine Surgeon
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland GA USA
Posts: 2,425
|
Quote:
It even runs more smoothly (OK, I am dreaming?).
|
I hear that all the time from those we have installed the technology for here.
The one time that I brought this point up on another forum I was chastised by the vendor haters. They said that it was absolutely impossible for this retrofit to allow the engine to run smoother than it previously did.
People.....
__________________
Jake Raby/www.flat6innovations.com
IMS Solution/ Faultless Tool Inventor
US Patent 8,992,089 &
US Patent 9,416,697
Developer of The IMS Retrofit Procedure- M96/ M97 Specialist
|
|
|
11-29-2013, 12:52 AM
|
#11
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 68
|
Took the outer seal off just now, Everything looks OK, and the bearing spins more freely with the seal off. But there is no lubricant other than a film of light oil that I can see, so I suppose the original lubricant is gone. It seems that the bearing was not in imminent danger of failing, but I wonder what the long term would have brought. I had an engine blow up in a car years ago, and finding a good used replacement engine seemed fraught with risks, so I would not enjoy doing it again, for the Boxster. I expected that the bearing would be OK. I'm still happy I did this.
|
|
|
11-29-2013, 10:09 AM
|
#12
|
Autobahn Glanz
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 1,282
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pjv
Took the outer seal off just now, Everything looks OK, and the bearing spins more freely with the seal off. But there is no lubricant other than a film of light oil that I can see, so I suppose the original lubricant is gone. It seems that the bearing was not in imminent danger of failing, but I wonder what the long term would have brought. I had an engine blow up in a car years ago, and finding a good used replacement engine seemed fraught with risks, so I would not enjoy doing it again, for the Boxster. I expected that the bearing would be OK. I'm still happy I did this.
|
You did the right thing, you'll sleep better with that single row piece of crapp out of there, and yes mine ran smoother with the new solution in, or it could have just been my relief that I installed it perfectly and my pride made me more happy
|
|
|
11-29-2013, 04:12 PM
|
#13
|
Beginner
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,659
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipE350
You did the right thing, you'll sleep better with that single row piece of crapp out of there, and yes mine ran smoother with the new solution in, or it could have just been my relief that I installed it perfectly and my pride made me more happy 
|
+1, and as for the running more smoothly, why not? The IMSB has clearance (rattle) which by definition plays into the valve timing in some manner. If the solution reduces a minute variation in valve timing by tightening up the correlation between the crankshaft and valve timing it stands to reason the engine would run more smoothly. My story and I'm sticking with it.
|
|
|
02-09-2014, 07:30 PM
|
#14
|
I am my own mechanic....
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 3,432
|
Does it come with a special tool to measure the piece of mind?
Can the relief be put into words? Can you describe it?
__________________
'04 Boxster S 50 Jahre 550 Spyder Anniversary Special Edition, 851 of 1953, 6-sp, IMS/RMS, GT Metallic silver, cocoa brown leather SOLD to member Broken Linkage.
'08 VW Touareg T-3 wife's car
'13 F150 Super Crew long bed 4x4 w/ Ego Boost
|
|
|
02-09-2014, 09:04 PM
|
#15
|
Engine Surgeon
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland GA USA
Posts: 2,425
|
Quote:
Therefore in reality it takes a very, very long time for the Solution to pay for itself.
|
The people who install the IMS Solution are generally not considering ever selling the car. To the, it pays for it's self right away.
You can't look at the different offerings from a price point of view, if you are doing that you generally won't keep the car forever and therefore should probably just use the cheaper product and let the car go after a while.
Cost is never a consideration for those who call us looking for the IMS Solution to be installed here. I think I have only had two people ever ask me about the differences in cost. Since the IMS Solution was released we haven't applied a single row classic retrofit, and only one person has asked for one. I set him up with the Single Row Pro, because its a mid price point offering.
Most people are going to the Solution, because its a complete design change that omits the ball bearing completely. People that understand how this works always say "it just makes sense".
__________________
Jake Raby/www.flat6innovations.com
IMS Solution/ Faultless Tool Inventor
US Patent 8,992,089 &
US Patent 9,416,697
Developer of The IMS Retrofit Procedure- M96/ M97 Specialist
|
|
|
02-10-2014, 01:24 PM
|
#16
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 68
|
It's about 3 months now since I had the Solution installed. I am happier with the car and drive it more often now, so clearly I have gained a benefit of sorts that justifies the cost, to me. And I have more or less forgotten about the financial cost. The impression that the engine is quieter and smoother, especially when idling, is still with me. The idle sound reminds me of a 993 that I test drove years ago, and I loved the sound of that engine. And I will probably keep the Boxster longer. So I am a happy customer.
|
|
|
02-10-2014, 06:24 PM
|
#17
|
Engine Surgeon
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland GA USA
Posts: 2,425
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pjv
It's about 3 months now since I had the Solution installed. I am happier with the car and drive it more often now, so clearly I have gained a benefit of sorts that justifies the cost, to me. And I have more or less forgotten about the financial cost. The impression that the engine is quieter and smoother, especially when idling, is still with me. The idle sound reminds me of a 993 that I test drove years ago, and I loved the sound of that engine. And I will probably keep the Boxster longer. So I am a happy customer.
|
Interesting that you've also noted the smoother running and you continue to. We hear that over and over again post IMS Solution install and there's a reason for it. Every time that we mention this people say its BS because there's no way that the bearing design change could lead to this. Those who have experienced it aren't making it up.
Some people like to solve a problem, others like to apply a less permanent fix, because of that we offer 3 products with 3 different service lives and price points. Others only offer one, and most of them didn't even design it themselves.
__________________
Jake Raby/www.flat6innovations.com
IMS Solution/ Faultless Tool Inventor
US Patent 8,992,089 &
US Patent 9,416,697
Developer of The IMS Retrofit Procedure- M96/ M97 Specialist
|
|
|
02-11-2014, 04:25 AM
|
#18
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: S. New Jersey
Posts: 1,239
|
That feeling of a smoother running motor makes sense to me. That whole area spinning all that chain should tighten up, the IMS would be more stable, especially if the car had lots of miles.
Why couldn't those Germans have thought of that?
Or was that the influence of Toyota engineers?
German engineering VS: American Ingenuity
Ain't America Great
__________________
2002 S - old school third pedal
Seal Grey
|
|
|
02-10-2014, 02:43 PM
|
#19
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 29
|
I don't know many people that don't ask what the price of something is before they buy it, maybe I'm out of my league here.
Really, single row IMS buyers are buying only the Solution and dual row IMS buyers are some mix between Retrofit and Solution? I guess the data says that dual row bearings weren’t that bad (weren’t as bad as single row) in the first place.
I was OK looking at used Porsches for my next car with the expectation of spending about $4k to $5k on preventative maintenance, IMS, brakes, water pump, and so on. But, if the IMS is fix $4k alone I’m probably out of the used Porsche market. I’m not a teen ager, I have pretty good income, I can buy a pretty good toy, there has to be a better option. Heck, I’ve been driving minivans and SUVs for 25 years, a Nissan Sentra is going to feel like a sports car.
I do understand the peace of mind value. One day you’ve got a fantastic powerful sports car the next day you’re in the pinewood derby. Engine rebuild/replace costs run from what $8K to $20K installed (not sure if $8k is too low)? So, an IMS Solution is 20% to 50% the cost of a rebuild?
To me the Solution makes the most sense on an engine rebuild. How long should a well maintained engine last? I know there's an example on YouTube of a million mile Porsche but that owner went through three engines. So let’s say a well maintained Porsche engine will last 350,000 miles or six clutch-IMS Retrofit changes. If you said the IMS Retrofit bearing increases the clutch replacement cost by $600 then after six clutch-IMS Retrofit changes the total IMS cost is $3,600, the Solution doesn’t not pay for itself by the 350,000 mile engine failure.
I’m sorry, I probably sound whiney. I think the Solution and Retrofit IMS fixes are clever. I can’t imagine how much collectively Porsche owners have lost on resale value from the D-chunk and IMS design short comings. It’s not hard to imagine that these issues cost Porsche in reputation and new sales. Porsche owners are losing resale value, lower resale value means that prospective buyers have less cash to put toward their next purchase.
Anyone want to try to talk me back in to the used Porsche market?
|
|
|
02-10-2014, 04:09 PM
|
#20
|
Beginner
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,659
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigShow
Anyone want to try to talk me back in to the used Porsche market?
|
Not me - you want a Porsche, you gotta pay the freight. They are expensive as h3ll and I've only driven mine 40 miles. Best drive I've ever had. If it blows up tomorrow I'll pop in a new engine - no questions asked.
__________________
2003 S manual
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:05 PM.
| |