View Single Post
Old 11-29-2013, 04:42 PM   #14
Jake Raby
Engine Surgeon
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland GA USA
Posts: 2,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jamesp View Post
+1, and as for the running more smoothly, why not? The IMSB has clearance (rattle) which by definition plays into the valve timing in some manner. If the solution reduces a minute variation in valve timing by tightening up the correlation between the crankshaft and valve timing it stands to reason the engine would run more smoothly. My story and I'm sticking with it.
Absolutely.. But the "vendor haters" always have to ******************** about something.
__________________
Jake Raby/www.flat6innovations.com
IMS Solution/ Faultless Tool Inventor
US Patent 8,992,089 &
US Patent 9,416,697
Developer of The IMS Retrofit Procedure- M96/ M97 Specialist
Jake Raby is offline   Reply With Quote