Was the 7 grand because it was a 97 or just a problem car? Could the 2000 S have been a bad car with the same problems? In other words is the 2000+ design so superior that the maintenance costs will be drasticly less? I'm perfectly happy with a 99 from a power/performance perspective. When I want acceleration and speed, I hop on my Triumph TT600 which will outperform any car costing less than a 100 grand.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by RandallNeighbour
I bought a 97 2.5 when I really wanted a 2000 3.2... I saved ten grand buying my car, but have put 7 into it so I could have had a newer one with a bigger engine waiting just 18 months.
Buy the car you know you want and don't settle for anything less. Then those 5000 precious miles a year will be spent enjoying the right car instead of seeing the right car pass you or in a parking lot and wondering why you didn't wait to get what you wanted.
|
Threaded Mode
