Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Boxster General Discussions

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-29-2010, 08:58 AM   #21
Registered User
 
Brucelee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 8,083
Quote:
Originally Posted by pothole
Fact: The classifieds have plenty of cars over 95k, at least the biggest classified car website here in the UK does.

136k

121k

Etc, etc, plenty more cars north of 100k.

Any suggestion such cars don't exist is clearly false. I very much doubt it's any different in the US.

Admittedly, I don't see any cars north of 150,000 miles. Whether that's because people tend not to use cars like these as daily drivers or because the cars are failing before this mileage is impossible to say.
You have no way of knowing how many of those cars have had engine trouble in the past.

__________________
Rich Belloff

Brucelee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2010, 10:19 AM   #22
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 874
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brucelee
You have no way of knowing how many of those cars have had engine trouble in the past.
That is very true. However, without any specific information they could just as easily be on the original engine as not.

Moreover, with high mile cars, advertisers usually go out of their way to highlight if the engine has been replaced and is carry significantly fewer miles than the chassis. Ya know, odo shows 130,000 but new engine fitted 40,000 miles ago. This is common in the UK at least. None of the ads I looked at mentions replacement engines.

I suspect if any of cars had engine replacements it would have been a good while ago as these cars have long since ceased to be economical to repair should the worse happen.

The other point to note about the anecdotal observation that nearly all engines failures happen at relatively low miles is that you might also conclude that the higher mile engines are the proven good ones. So if you do see one with 100k up on the original lump, you know it's a goodun'.

Frankly, I don't know if that's true. I just don't really follow Mr Raby's contribution in this thread. His comment seems to be a clear attempt to infer that these lumps don't seem to last beyond 100k, but he seems unwilling to come out and say that. If that's not what he is inferring, then I'm not sure what we are supposed to learn from his comment.

Personally, I think these engines probably are prone to many, many more failures than an equivalent, say, BMW six-cylinder engine. But that doesn't necessarily mean it's terribly likely you'll experience the worst yourself. Exactly what the chances of actual failure are in a well maintained engine I think is super hard to judge. If you read enough of these threads you might come away with the impression that it's 50/50. I doubt it's as bad as that. But I guess we will never know.
__________________
Manual '00 3.2 S Arctic Silver
pothole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2010, 10:35 AM   #23
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: BC
Posts: 1,310
Quote:
Originally Posted by Highlow
if a 1k repair is going to break the bank, you really shouldn't have one of these anyway.
I don't think most are concerned with the 1k bills, it's the multi-k bills resulting from a blown engine.
__________________
2001 Boxster, 5 spd, Seal Grey
clickman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2010, 01:49 PM   #24
Registered User
 
Steve Tinker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Queensland, Australia
Posts: 1,522
pothole,
I think what Jake Raby is trying to get over is that all of the broken engines he has seen this year have been comparativly low mileage (under 100,000 miles) catastrophic failures as apposed to "worn out" by high mileage.
Probably if he was in the servicing game instead of the "Help, my egine's just died, what can I do" game, he would see a lot more high mileage M96 engined cars in his shop.
__________________
2001 Boxster S (triple black). Sleeping easier with LN Engineering/Flat 6 IMS upgrade, low temp thermostat & underspeed pulley.
2001 MV Agusta F4.
Steve Tinker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2010, 02:01 PM   #25
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: near Chicago
Posts: 523
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikefocke
Let me know when you find an engine design without faults.

I own a Honda and an Acura of around the same year/miles as my '01S 58k Boxster.
I own a Chevy small block that has better performance, and better mileage, and has far fewer faults than a Porsche engine. If I had been driving that car on the track, it would not have failed. Most people would agree that a Honda engine requires very little repairs. In fact, you're the first person I've ever heard that doesn't swear by the reliability of Hondas.

My opinion is that these engines are designed to be throw away engines. There are a lot of flaws in these engines that just shouldn't be there, and apparently, won't ever be changed.
Mike_Yi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2010, 07:46 AM   #26
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Missouri
Posts: 112
Quote:
Originally Posted by JFP in PA
Actually, anyone that has an intermediate shaft can (and do) have the dreaded IMS failure; so that is right up to the latest, and shaft-less versions of 2009………….
I can't argue that IMS failure is *possible* for any car up to 2009 -- but I have never read any actual owner reports of an IMS failure since the 2006 IMS redesign. I see fair numbers of failure reports on 2005's and early 2006's, but I have never seen an actual IMS failure report for later 2006's, 2007's, or 2008's from someone who personally suffered such a failure. In fact, I've only seen a couple of engine failure reports for these years at all, and those were both cars being tracked, and the failure was thought to be oil starvation. If you can point me to an IMS failure report for a late-model 987, please do so and I will gladly retract this.

After 9 years of trying and trying to fix the problem, it is logical to think that Porsche would have provided a *better* IMS in the 2006-up IMS's than in the old ones. Not infallible, for sure, but likely better and less likely to fail.
johnsimion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2010, 10:32 AM   #27
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: It's a kind of magic.....
Posts: 6,261
While I can't direct you to a "report", I can tell you we just did an engine replacement in an '07 with an IMS engine failure, and I personally know of at least three more that fall into your suspect model years category; I have also talked to three dealers in my area that have seen one or more of them as well. What is not known is if the larger assembly was any better or worse than the earlier designs. And as a further reference point, the larger (and final) IMS bearing assembly appeared in M96's as early as the second half of 2005, so these newer designs are only recently getting into the IMS “sweet spot” mileage, so the ones known to exist may only be the “tip of the iceberg” as for the most part, many of the later failures were covered under warranty, so no knowledgeable individual outside of the dealer network may have had a chance to examine the engine before it went back to Germany, so the owner may not have been given all the pertinent data……… But, in any case, the larger IMS bearing definitely did not end the issue…………..
__________________
Anything really new is invented only in one’s youth. Later, one becomes more experienced, more famous – and more stupid.” - Albert Einstein
JFP in PA is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2010, 04:13 AM   #28
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 133
Thanks for the replies................

and I take away the general feeling that these engines are marginal, at best, and that there is a 50/50 chance of having some failure before reaching that 100K miles mark. I do understand that other brands fail as well, but normally to the tune of a $3K repair jobs, not $20K+, and the cars costing at only 1/2 of the price of a Boxster.

As others have said, don't obsess about it, and I take that as good advise. I'll continue to drive the car, enjoy the ride, and perform the scheduled maintenances when required. I hope I can report to you in five years that my car is still 'alive', but............if it breaks, it breaks. How disappointed I will be, but I think from then on, you'll see me driving in something else that has a more proven reliability record, i.e., Honda, BMW, small block Chevy, or something similar.
Soetekouw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2010, 05:38 AM   #29
Engine Surgeon
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland GA USA
Posts: 2,425
Anything mechanical will wear out if the service life is long enough and any machine will break. No engine is completely bullet proof when making a decent amount of power. All this is easy for me to state and understand as I've been breaking stuff my entire life.

The M96 does have it's share of problems and the majority of these could have been avoided if the MFR had stated a more definitive set of service directives that require scheduled replacements of some high risk components.

A good example is the water pump, if the directives would have stated to change the water pump after 3 years, no matter the mileage I would have 4 cars on our property right now with failed engines. If the IMS bearing retrofit was required at 40K miles most of the cars we see with IMS failures also would avoid the issues as well.

With other cars its totally normal to change a timing belt at 60K miles and doing so is required, if not the engine will implode just like an M96 does with an IMS bearing failure. changing these timing belts can easily cost as much as an IMSR procedure. The difference is the directives tell technicians and owners that this needs to be done.

The M96 was hyped up to be much more reliable than it's aircooled predecessors which made the cars more appealing to a different group of driver. Unfortunately that group of driver's bought the car for the wrong reason in lots of instances and have treated it like a Toyota or Honda and thats what has made a big impact on the failures we see.

Drive the car like a Porsche, maintain the car like a Porsche and use your common sense to replace components before they fail and you'll have a much better experience with the M96 powered Porsche.

That said, I had a car come in on Friday for an IMSR (04 Boxster) that was to be done as a preventive measure. In our pre- IMSR evaluation we found that the engine had compression numbers 50-60 PSI low on all cylinders. We talked to the owner and he said that 10 days before the car was shipped to us that it had an episode where it smoked briefly and then started to run poorly.

With 34K on the clock and having been insanely maintained, this one is unexplained as to why it lost compression on all 6 cylinders evenly. What was going to be a quick IMSR/ Water pump/ AOS upgrade turned into another 18K expenditure. This one surprised all of us involved and it'll be interesting to see what truly took the engine out.

Its a good thing this car came to us for the IMSR as we do an extensive pre-eval that showed this issue before we spent 3,500.00 of the owner's money to upgrade an engine that was already failed, but still ran.
__________________
Jake Raby/www.flat6innovations.com
IMS Solution/ Faultless Tool Inventor
US Patent 8,992,089 &
US Patent 9,416,697
Developer of The IMS Retrofit Procedure- M96/ M97 Specialist
Jake Raby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2010, 10:21 AM   #30
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sanford NC
Posts: 2,533
No freeking way there is a 50% chance of failure

And I'd surmise no one knows for sure exactly what it is, not even Porsche (as many of the cars Jake sees wouldn't be in their statistics).

My impression is you have a 1-3% chance of failure per year driven. Maybe more if poorly maintained or seldom driven. On the lower side is you do things right.

IIRC: The highest mileage Porsche Boxster I know of (Marc) is over 238k miles on the original engine. Pedro's engine blew at 207k on the track (after lots of track/AX time) but not from an IMS failure. Both are older cars with lots of miles. Both have original IMSs. Both were maintained much better than the book by Porsche knowledgeable folk. One was generally dealer maintained, one was owner maintained.
mikefocke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2010, 10:40 AM   #31
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: It's a kind of magic.....
Posts: 6,261
Correction Mike, Pedro's engine had the LN retrofit in it when it blew, I believe from a rod failure not related to the IMS...................
__________________
Anything really new is invented only in one’s youth. Later, one becomes more experienced, more famous – and more stupid.” - Albert Einstein
JFP in PA is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2010, 11:25 AM   #32
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Chadds Ford, PA
Posts: 177
All this IMS talk has be once again debating an 05 S and doing the IMS upgrade or spending more for an 09 S.
SeaNile31 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2010, 11:56 AM   #33
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sanford NC
Posts: 2,533
Jfp

You may be right on Pedro's engine...and the LN bearing was put in at what mileage? Probably 160k+ as it hasn't been out that long and my last said the longest mileage on the LN part was at about 30k.

I was responding to multiple points from prior posters..that there was a 50% failure rate and that there were few cars with many many miles on an IMS. Neither of which assertions my readings cause me to agree with. And trying to use Pedro's car as an example because it had so many miles on the original engine and failed not from an IMS problem and not on normal roads in normal driving style..though perhaps it was for him.

And if someone is worried about that risk, what about the other 4-6 potential causes of failure that we hear of? I figure I've over- improved too many of my cars.

What are the odds of 3 tail lights burning out on the wife's Acura at the same time? I replaced all 4 but then the cost was $2.50 for the extra bulb and my labor is cheap.
mikefocke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2010, 01:07 PM   #34
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: It's a kind of magic.....
Posts: 6,261
I have to agree with some of your points Mike; I don't think the IMS failure rate is anywhere near 50%; or even 25% for that matter. Problem is that we are never going to know the real failure rate; that said, I know for a fact it does happen, and at some rate that is high enough to be discomforting to anyone with an M96/7, including the post 2006 units with the "last attempt" large diameter IMS bearing. The biggest issues are that it often gives little, if any warning; and the results are catastrophic, both mechanically and financially. And, yes, there are sevaral examples of very high mile cars with the OEM IMS in them.

Fortunately, there are ways to deal with it. So rather than sit around and endlessly debate it, perhaps it is time for those concerned to become pro-active.
__________________
Anything really new is invented only in one’s youth. Later, one becomes more experienced, more famous – and more stupid.” - Albert Einstein
JFP in PA is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2010, 01:48 PM   #35
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,746
Quote:
Originally Posted by JFP in PA
I have to agree with some of your points Mike; I don't think the IMS failure rate is anywhere near 50%; or even 25% for that matter. Problem is that we are never going to know the real failure rate; that said, I know for a fact it does happen, and at some rate that is high enough to be discomforting to anyone with an M96/7, including the post 2006 units with the "last attempt" large diameter IMS bearing. The biggest issues are that it often gives little, if any warning; and the results are catastrophic, both mechanically and financially. And, yes, there are sevaral examples of very high mile cars with the OEM IMS in them.

Fortunately, there are ways to deal with it. So rather than sit around and endlessly debate it, perhaps it is time for those concerned to become pro-active.

Game, Set, Match.
coreseller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2010, 02:15 PM   #36
Engine Surgeon
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland GA USA
Posts: 2,425
Percentages are worthless to discuss, everyone wants a "number" to either scare them to death or make them feel all warm and fuzzy inside.. Fact is, no one knows exactly how many engines were built, and without that data no percentage can be figured.

Pedro's engine had only been IMS Retrofitted for a couple of months before it snapped a rod in half. Last time I talked to him he was looking for another used engine and I recommended that he just remove the IMS bearing from the scattered engine and use it again in the replacement. I have no idea if he did this or not.

How good is your luck? Thats just about what it equates to and thats no joke.

Taking your chances with this engine is like Russian Roulette, instead of a revolver holding 6 rounds, the engine has 6 cylinders. Sometimes you hear a bang, sometimes you don't.
__________________
Jake Raby/www.flat6innovations.com
IMS Solution/ Faultless Tool Inventor
US Patent 8,992,089 &
US Patent 9,416,697
Developer of The IMS Retrofit Procedure- M96/ M97 Specialist
Jake Raby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2010, 02:16 PM   #37
JTP
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: MD
Posts: 628
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikefocke
my last said the longest mileage on the LN part was at about 30k.
Only 30k on the longest run IMSR? That's it? I wish I could be a test bed for it, I drove my Box 18,000 miles in the last 7 months and by 12 months I'd be close to 30k. I'm paranoid about the IMS, water pump, AOS, etc but I'm trying to keep on the maintenence and drive it alot.
JTP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2010, 02:36 PM   #38
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: It's a kind of magic.....
Posts: 6,261
I don't think people realize how low the mileage is on a lot of these cars are due to limited or seasonal use; we had an 01S up on the lift today getting it ready to go into hibernation for the winter, original owner, 9,734 miles.................

When it comes to the LN retrofit, look at the numbers differently: Over 1,000 units on the road, zero failures...................
__________________
Anything really new is invented only in one’s youth. Later, one becomes more experienced, more famous – and more stupid.” - Albert Einstein
JFP in PA is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2010, 03:53 PM   #39
JTP
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: MD
Posts: 628
I just can't believe how little people drive these cars. People probably think I'm abusing my car because I drive it so much, even through the snow.
JTP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2010, 05:55 PM   #40
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Chadds Ford, PA
Posts: 177
So what are the weak parts of these cars, specifically 987?

IMS- knew about it
RMS- knew about it
Alternator- did not know? new to me
Water pump-again, new to me
AOS-new to me

So in an 05 S it would be wise to upgrade to the LN IMS, but what about the other issues? Is it necessary to replace the waterpump, etc in these cars? If so, that is a significant amount on money to put into a new to me car.

And to think I've owned a few Boxster cars before and never had an issue!

SeaNile31 is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page