01-16-2007, 11:25 AM
|
#21
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Where the Sewer Meets the Sea, CA. USA
Posts: 2,695
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MNBoxster
Hi,
Here's one that could use a little Weight Loss Program...
Happy Motoring!... Jim'99
|
Yuck, im grossed out by it... its like seeing a very very fat german lady naked
|
|
|
01-17-2007, 07:48 AM
|
#22
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 8,709
|
I've never understood why the Braile isn't stock in all sports cars. Its a big weight savings and a battery lasts a long time.... Dead weight pointless..
as for the flywheel that seems unclear to me. I'm hesistant to deviate from stock in the drivetrain. I had several light flywheels and clutch in previous cars like the Fidanza and ClutchNet, an excellent mod for an powered car in particular.
__________________
GT3 Recaro Seats - Boxster Red
GT3 Aero / Carrera 18" 5 spoke / Potenza RE-11
Fabspeed Headers & Noise Maker
BORN: March 2000 - FINLAND
IMS#1 REPLACED: April 2010 - NEW JERSEY -- LNE DUAL ROW
|
|
|
01-23-2007, 04:58 PM
|
#23
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 27
|
Those Braille Batteries are great, they actually tip the scales just over 11 pounds. I have an Odyssey 680 which is just around 15 pounds in my MR2 Spyder. We sell both batteries; the Odyssey is cheaper but not quite as scant.
Braille/Recaro also offers a fixed back seat customized to your dimensions and cloth/color preferances. These dont weigh much more than their batteries.
I removed my entire front trunk and plastic cladding in efforts to cut the weight.
The Spyder is about as stable on the freeway as a cigar boat on the Bering Sea...
Next time I'll just hit the treadmill.
PS: Has anyone weighed a Boxster 986/987 Seat?
__________________
Blake Erven
Race By Design
www.racebydesign.net
www.myspace.com/racebydesign
racebydesign@yahoo.com
|
|
|
01-23-2007, 05:11 PM
|
#24
|
Guest
|
No, but I heard they are like 40 pounds.
|
|
|
01-30-2007, 02:58 PM
|
#25
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 110
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by edevlin
In response to the lightweight flywheel, I love it. Mine also chatters a little on idle, but only when the clutch is out in neutral. Not only does the engine rev more freely, but it sure feels more responsive. I would recommend it to anyone that is getting a new clutch.
The Braille lightweight battery is pretty cool. I got it directly from Braille in Florida, they included free shipping. The sucker is small, but has 550 cold cranking amps. It has no problem starting the car in low 20's weather. I also have a JL Audio 4X75 watt amp powering 8 JL Audio and Infinity speakers in the car (dash, door, rears).
If the battery is not up to snuff, and you play the system loud with the headlights on, the lights will dim on loud bass passages. That does not happen with the Braille battery, so it does a pretty good job of dumping current. I have not had it that long, so dont know about the longevity, but losing a good 30 lbs of mass that sits high on the car seems to be a good thing so far....
|
Is there a special tray or mounting to hold the smaller battery in place?
|
|
|
01-30-2007, 03:10 PM
|
#26
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NYC area
Posts: 681
|
I am definitely gonna buy that battery!
And whoever said seats....I always wanted to remove my passenger seat. Is that hard to do?
__________________
Miss my Boxster
|
|
|
02-02-2007, 04:33 PM
|
#27
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NYC area
Posts: 681
|
So will any of their batteries fit in my car or do I need a special battery?
It says they fit in most vehicles.
__________________
Miss my Boxster
|
|
|
02-03-2007, 08:17 AM
|
#28
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 110
|
Does anyone have the weight on the stock boxster seats?
Specificly the standard seat with no heat and only the two elect adjustments.
I have a potential buyer for these stock seats and the GT3 seats are lookin' pretty schweeet.
|
|
|
02-03-2007, 08:39 AM
|
#29
|
Guest
|
Jeez, are you serious? Ive had mine in the for sale section forever now.
|
|
|
02-03-2007, 09:08 AM
|
#30
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 110
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by boggtown
Jeez, are you serious? Ive had mine in the for sale section forever now.
|
Yes, (possible) buyer. And this is at a "blow out price"
|
|
|
02-03-2007, 10:21 AM
|
#31
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Illinois
Posts: 3,033
|
Just wanted to add that losing 100lbs off the car is roughly equivelent to adding 10hp so I've heard.
|
|
|
02-03-2007, 10:53 AM
|
#32
|
Guest
|
Hmm, maybe. I always heard it as 100 LBs will give you a tenth in the quarter mile. To some extent at least. What was this "blow out price"?
|
|
|
02-03-2007, 10:56 AM
|
#33
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NYC area
Posts: 681
|
It depends what car we're talking about.
So no one knows if any of their batteries will fit my car? I am looking at the 11.5lb one and the 15lb one.
I'm sure it will fit, but I don't wanna just buy it and have it not fit.
__________________
Miss my Boxster
|
|
|
02-03-2007, 11:14 AM
|
#34
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Illinois
Posts: 3,033
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by boggtown
Hmm, maybe. I always heard it as 100 LBs will give you a tenth in the quarter mile. To some extent at least. What was this "blow out price"?
|
Yes, I've heard that too, losing 100lbs or adding 10hp should lower the car's 1/4 mile time approx a tenth of a second but it depends on a lot of variables. Cutting a 100lbs off a 1,900lb Elise is going to make a more profound difference compared to say a 4,000lb M5.
|
|
|
02-13-2007, 01:56 PM
|
#35
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 27
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by boggtown
Hmm, maybe. I always heard it as 100 LBs will give you a tenth in the quarter mile. To some extent at least. What was this "blow out price"?
|
The 100 pounds per 10th or per 10 hp is a VERY rough rule of thumb but has been used in the past mostly with the musclecar guys. Its very similar to the 5 psi of boost is safe for any engine; or 11.5:1 A/R ratio will give the most horsepower at the safest tune.
The only problem with the 100 pound rule is it works *pretty* well when determining V-8 rwd 1.5-2.0 ton vehicles. Torque moves weight easily and most of those vehicles have a ton to start with (torque and weight).
A Boxster losing 100 pounds with its smaller engine and less initial weight is losing a higher percentage of mass as compared to a Mustang or Chevelle. Better yet, my 2100 Corolla-powered MR2 Spyder losing 100 pounds which is close to 5% of its entire weight.
The better solution is to calculate a vehicle with a very similar powertrain and play the power vs weight game. If you have a Boxster 2.5L compare whp with a Boxster S and try to get accurate weights of both vehicles. Then take off 100 pounds and recalculate the new power/weight ratio of both vehicles and contrast them with stock quarter mile times (take these with a grain of salt too as they vary depending on the day, car, and magazine).
Ready for more frustration? Two vehicles with equal power-to-weight ratios and drivetrain configurations can be vastly different. Depending on cam changes, aerodynamics, gearing, etc one car can be significantly faster from 60 mph upwards than another. This is why vehicles like the Boxster, S2000, and RX-8 can destroy some of the bigger dogs on the track. Of course there are other factors with that as well.
As for the Braille battery or the Odyssey PC680...both have custom battery trays available for those who dont want to weld and hack like I did to my box. I am adding those to the site as I write this.
__________________
Blake Erven
Race By Design
www.racebydesign.net
www.myspace.com/racebydesign
racebydesign@yahoo.com
|
|
|
02-13-2007, 05:38 PM
|
#36
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NYC area
Posts: 681
|
Gearing is probably the best mod you can do aside from FI, but people don't do it.
I hate my 5 speed because of this. I want closer gears...
Will order the battery in a couple days!
__________________
Miss my Boxster
|
|
|
02-13-2007, 05:50 PM
|
#37
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 27
|
At least you dont have Toyota Corolla gears, lol.
Sounds good to me.
__________________
Blake Erven
Race By Design
www.racebydesign.net
www.myspace.com/racebydesign
racebydesign@yahoo.com
|
|
|
02-15-2007, 05:04 PM
|
#38
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: MD
Posts: 447
|
Don't forget about the impact of wheels. Porsche wheels are very heavy by design.
The CCWs I just picked up are strong, and they weigh 12-14lbs less per corner than the stock ones. You get double bang for your buck because you're removing unsprung weight which is also inertial. Big improvement!
My '00 S is 2960 with the CCWs on and about 5 gallons of fuel in the tank. With no exhaust and minimal fuel for competition it's closing in on 2900. Not light, but better than a lot of cars.
|
|
|
02-15-2007, 08:04 PM
|
#39
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NYC area
Posts: 681
|
Also lightweight wheels will free up horsepower
__________________
Miss my Boxster
|
|
|
02-21-2007, 05:17 PM
|
#40
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 27
|
Besides the reduction in unsprung weight making the vehicle more throttle responsive/quick in a straight line, it also helps braking and suspension agility.
A great practice is to also check the specs of tires when it comes time for replacement. Find current tire diameter and weights from a website like Tirerack.com or from the manufacturer site. Sometimes squeezing a really wide tire on a rim that would better use a narrower tire isnt a great practice:
*Increases weight
*Ineffective contact patch
*Pinched sidewall leads to less responsive handling
*Many times increased rolling diameter
Setting our 2006 Altima SER up for G-Stock we have realized that using a 225/40/18 Hoosier A6 rather than a 245/45/18 is a better match for our 8" wheel. The tire is also 3 pounds less and 3 inches shorter than the 245 effectively decreasing our long second gear. The 245's will look MUCH better but thats not always the fastest way around the cones especially with soft rubber.
Boxster's dont always have the same luxury as tire brands/sizes are harder to come by and more expensive. However, if you can still work a staggered combination and effectively utilize your wheel widths the car will simply be faster than the "steam roller" crowd unless they are running 12" wheels, etc.
Light wheels and rotors help a ton; tires and wheel width can increase/decrease the most rotational mass from your equation since they are on the furthest point from the axles. Narrow and soft is better than wide and hard especially if you can drop some weight.
Then again, on a daily driven vehicle we cant always be replacing tires every 6k miles. There is definitely a fine-line to walk.
__________________
Blake Erven
Race By Design
www.racebydesign.net
www.myspace.com/racebydesign
racebydesign@yahoo.com
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:21 AM.
| |