Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Performance and Technical Chat

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-19-2013, 11:56 AM   #1
Registered User
 
jaykay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: toronto
Posts: 2,668
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank A View Post
The rate at which the flap opens can be regulated by the diameter of the vacuum line that feeds the flap bellows, larger diameter more volume transfer the faster the valve opens. The vacuum canister should have more than enough capacity to handle this. The plastic lines used currently have a 1mm I.D the combination of the small diameter and the volume air needed to actuate these devices does two things, regulates the time between normal and activated state, and lessens the affect of pressure pulses creating pulsed transition from normal to to actuated.
Besides I have always been a fan of a 2 stroke like power curve, just as long as it is consistent. And I'm the only driver on this buss!
Yes. True I didn't think about the line size and diaphragm diameter...could be okay!

Hey I rode ported and polished RZ-350 for 7 years so I hear yah!
__________________
986 00S
jaykay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2013, 08:04 AM   #2
Registered User
 
BYprodriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: O.C. CA
Posts: 3,709
Garage
Finally got the 987 airbox & maf tube in & made a hose to connect to 997 plenum & 74mm T/B. Hard to see much of the hose, maybe I can get a better pic on a sunny day. My engine is 3.6L so runs very lean unless maf is disconnected then it runs ok just a little rich. Next is the 996 flash.
BYprodriver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2013, 08:43 AM   #3
Registered User
 
The Radium King's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,152
just thinking a bit here: anyone try to push a 996 flash onto a 3.2 986 that has the larger cayman maf housing? ie, do what you've done but to a 3.2? would really allow you to reduce restrictions in the intake tract, but the maps might be off for the smaller displacement (maf reading would be correct so afrs should be ok)? is there a special flash for the 2004 anniversary edition that had the 3.2 with larger maf housing?
The Radium King is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2013, 02:33 PM   #4
Registered User
 
The Radium King's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,152
I guess an 04 anniversary edition tune wouldn't work as it's a 7.8 dme. still, a 996 tune *might* work - afr's would be fine, maf readings would be fine with a cayman maf housing. I think it would just be a question of the maps being able to deal with the fact that the rpms wouldn't correlate to the amount of air (3.2 vs 3.4 displacement) but I think that there must be enough room in the maps for this, otherwise lne wouldn't be able to say that a 3.6 bore works fine with the oem 3.2 tune (same thing only in reverse).

so, we need someone with a 3.2 to put a cayman airbox and maf housing in their car and push a 3.4 996 tune onto it and see if it runs ...
The Radium King is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2013, 01:28 PM   #5
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 148
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Radium King View Post

so, we need someone with a 3.2 to put a cayman airbox and maf housing in their car and push a 3.4 996 tune onto it and see if it runs ...
That is my most recent plan for my car...though it is not a 3.2 anymore. We tried some updated tunes awhile back to no avail. Currently running an updated stock tune which is better than it was, just not great. Having the car on the road for over a year now, and dealing with various issues from the beginning I'm ready to once again try and make it right. Looking at putting the IPD plenum and a 987 TB on it too.

Will report back once the 996 tune is tried.
onaFLYer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2013, 10:11 AM   #6
Registered User
 
BYprodriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: O.C. CA
Posts: 3,709
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Radium King View Post
I guess an 04 anniversary edition tune wouldn't work as it's a 7.8 dme. still, a 996 tune *might* work - afr's would be fine, maf readings would be fine with a cayman maf housing. I think it would just be a question of the maps being able to deal with the fact that the rpms wouldn't correlate to the amount of air (3.2 vs 3.4 displacement) but I think that there must be enough room in the maps for this, otherwise lne wouldn't be able to say that a 3.6 bore works fine with the oem 3.2 tune (same thing only in reverse).

so, we need someone with a 3.2 to put a cayman airbox and maf housing in their car and push a 3.4 996 tune onto it and see if it runs ...
I think it would run ok just possibly a little too much cam too early due to the 996 timing. I would have to compare the cam timing differences.
BYprodriver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2013, 10:17 AM   #7
Registered User
 
BYprodriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: O.C. CA
Posts: 3,709
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by BYprodriver View Post
Finally got the 987 airbox & maf tube in & made a hose to connect to 997 plenum & 74mm T/B. Hard to see much of the hose, maybe I can get a better pic on a sunny day. My engine is 3.6L so runs very lean unless maf is disconnected then it runs ok just a little rich. Next is the 996 flash.
996 flash works great for the 3.6L, I was surprised how much power this combo added! The intake roar is startling! New dyno test coming.
BYprodriver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2013, 03:21 PM   #8
1999 base
 
Meir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Coral Springs FL
Posts: 1,617
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by BYprodriver View Post
996 flash works great for the 3.6L, I was surprised how much power this combo added! The intake roar is startling! New dyno test coming.
Who did the 996 flush for you if I may ask?
Meir is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2013, 08:10 PM   #9
Registered User
 
BYprodriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: O.C. CA
Posts: 3,709
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Meir View Post
Who did the 996 flush for you if I may ask?
I did with my PST2
BYprodriver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2013, 01:03 PM   #10
1999 base
 
Meir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Coral Springs FL
Posts: 1,617
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by BYprodriver View Post
I did with my PST2
good to know you have one
Meir is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2013, 06:16 PM   #11
Porsche "Purist"
 
Paul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 2,123
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by BYprodriver View Post
I did with my PST2
When I reflashed mine, I got to see some of Porsche's humor while the download was taking place:

__________________
1998 Boxster with 7.8 DME, 2005 3.6 liter/325 hp, Variocam Plus, 996 Instrument panel
2001 Boxster original owner. I installed used motor at 89k.
1987 924S. 2002 996TT. PST-2
Owned and repaired Porsches since 1974. Porsche: It's not driving, it's therapy.
Paul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2013, 08:00 PM   #12
Registered User
 
jaykay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: toronto
Posts: 2,668
That's harsh ....I think a more encouraging message would appropriate!
__________________
986 00S
jaykay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2013, 07:49 AM   #13
Registered User
 
BYprodriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: O.C. CA
Posts: 3,709
Garage
[QUOTE=Paul;334848]When I reflashed mine, I got to see some of Porsche's humor while the download was taking place:

Thankfully my 2000 Box IP doesn't have that "big screen" option.
BYprodriver is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page