Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Performance and Technical Chat

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-09-2011, 04:46 PM   #1
Certified Boxster Addict
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,669
I am having a LWFW (and new clutch) installed right now. Should be done by tomorrow.

After reading through this thread (and others), there is no way that removing the DMFW and installing a LWFW can cause crankshaft failure. No how, no way. All production engines are factory balanced to the degree necessary (along with the proper design considerations such as bearing placement and type) to ensure proper and sufficient engine balance.

No engine is in perfect balance, no matter how much time and effort you put into it. Some engines can be in better balance than others but meeting the engine balance criteria to ensure long-term engine reliability is easily met by standard design and production methods.

Harmonics are a red herring in this discusion. Harmonics have very little energy unless a forcing function is driving at one of the harmonic frequencies. Yes, this can happen to a really old bridge in high winds but can't happen in a modern engine because the only forcing function in an engine is the cylinders firing which create the primary or fudamental frequency.

Beyond that, there's nothing in an engine (analogous to the wind in the bridge example) that would drive a harmonic with sufficient energy to cause catastrophic failure of the engine.

The DMFW is meant to reduce minor engine vibration from being transmitted to the body and interior (as part of NVH control), not to keep the engine from self destructing.
__________________
1999 996 C2 - sold - bought back - sold for more
1997 Spec Boxster BSR #254
1979 911 SC
POC Licensed DE/TT Instructor

Last edited by thstone; 06-09-2011 at 05:32 PM.
thstone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2011, 10:49 AM   #2
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: MD
Posts: 2
What type of clutch are you going with?
07Prototype is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2011, 06:17 PM   #3
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,820
Quote:
Originally Posted by thstone
After reading through this thread (and others), there is no way that removing the DMFW and installing a LWFW can cause crankshaft failure. No how, no way. All production engines are factory balanced to the degree necessary (along with the proper design considerations such as bearing placement and type) to ensure proper and sufficient engine balance.

You're assuming the aasco unit is balanced. I had mine done this week. The clutch / fw combo were 17g out of balance. 15g of that was the flywheel. That can break a crankshaft.

07proto - I use a sprung spec stage 1
__________________
insite
'99 Boxster
3.4L Conversion

http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t...1/KMTGPR-1.jpg
insite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2011, 11:21 PM   #4
Certified Boxster Addict
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,669
Quote:
Originally Posted by insite
You're assuming the aasco unit is balanced. I had mine done this week. The clutch / fw combo were 17g out of balance. 15g of that was the flywheel. That can break a crankshaft.

07proto - I use a sprung spec stage 1

The outer section (approximately 4 pounds (not grams)) of my DWFW was flopping around like a beached whale because the damping material was so worn. That had to create vibrations that were 100x what any LWFW might cause due to out-of-the-box unbalance and its probably been that way for several thousand miles.

Any flywheel that is several grams out of balance won't destroy an engine - or a failing DMFW (with 4 pounds wobbling around on the end of the crankshaft) would be the end of every engine.

I installed a Sachs High Performance Spring Hub Clutch, PN: 88-1861-000-017. Drove it home today, runs and shifts great.

By the way, I skipped replacing the IMS too. If it's gone 90,000 miles, I figure that there is no reason why it won't keep working. Call me an idiot if you'd like, but I'm spending the IMS replacement money on new tires and more track time.
__________________
1999 996 C2 - sold - bought back - sold for more
1997 Spec Boxster BSR #254
1979 911 SC
POC Licensed DE/TT Instructor

Last edited by thstone; 06-10-2011 at 11:37 PM.
thstone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2011, 04:53 AM   #5
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,820
How many g's do you think are exerted outward by centripetal force at the edge of a flywheel turning 7300 rpm? 100? 1000?

Try ELEVEN THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED. 11,300g at my redline. That means 17grams becomes 425 lb. Over time, that wobble can absolutely fatigue the crank. It's not forged, it's sintered.
__________________
insite
'99 Boxster
3.4L Conversion

http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t...1/KMTGPR-1.jpg
insite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2011, 10:20 PM   #6
Certified Boxster Addict
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,669
Quote:
Originally Posted by insite
How many g's do you think are exerted outward by centripetal force at the edge of a flywheel turning 7300 rpm? 100? 1000?

Try ELEVEN THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED. 11,300g at my redline. That means 17grams becomes 425 lb. Over time, that wobble can absolutely fatigue the crank. It's not forged, it's sintered.

My point is that the crank won't fatigue because the force (your calculation of 425 lbs) is far below the fatigue load. This situation isn't like bending a paper clip back and forth until it breaks. This load level is more like me trying to bend a street light post. No matter how long I push on it (months, years, decades), it ain't never gonna break.

This is why owners can drive around with a failing DMFW for thousands of miles (which produces 100x the force of your example LWFW) and everything is still ok.
__________________
1999 996 C2 - sold - bought back - sold for more
1997 Spec Boxster BSR #254
1979 911 SC
POC Licensed DE/TT Instructor
thstone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2011, 04:15 AM   #7
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,820
Quote:
Originally Posted by thstone
My point is that the crank won't fatigue because the force (your calculation of 425 lbs) is far below the fatigue load. This situation isn't like bending a paper clip back and forth until it breaks. This load level is more like me trying to bend a street light post. No matter how long I push on it (months, years, decades), it ain't never gonna break.

This is why owners can drive around with a failing DMFW for thousands of miles (which produces 100x the force of your example LWFW) and everything is still ok.

Sorry, you have no idea what you are talking about
__________________
insite
'99 Boxster
3.4L Conversion

http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t...1/KMTGPR-1.jpg
insite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2011, 08:40 AM   #8
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Depends on the day of the week....
Posts: 1,400
Quote:
Originally Posted by insite
Sorry, you have no idea what you are talking about
Totally Agree.
__________________
Boxster S
Cloudsurfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2011, 09:38 PM   #9
Certified Boxster Addict
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,669
Quote:
Originally Posted by insite
Sorry, you have no idea what you are talking about
Ok, I'll agree and maybe I have it all wrong. Can you please enrich my understanding:

If I recall correctly, most metals have a stress below which they can withstand an infinite number of stress cycles (me pushing on a light post). Above this level, the life disminishes in proportion to the stress and number of stress cycles.

So, the question is: How does the load you calculated (425 lbs) compare to the fatigue stress of sintered steel?
__________________
1999 996 C2 - sold - bought back - sold for more
1997 Spec Boxster BSR #254
1979 911 SC
POC Licensed DE/TT Instructor
thstone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2011, 07:02 PM   #10
Engine Surgeon
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland GA USA
Posts: 2,425
What is illustrated here is a lot of imbalance, but it is what we see on a daily basis. For some reason no one wants to listen to our experiences, including the manufacturers of the imbalances components.

What is clear in the experience of insure is the fact that these assemblies require balancing before installation. This something we have known for a decade, but something that no one seems to concur with.

I gave up trying to share, we just apply our experiences to those who seek out our specialized services. Glad to see the engine is smooth now, at least we were effective.
__________________
Jake Raby/www.flat6innovations.com
IMS Solution/ Faultless Tool Inventor
US Patent 8,992,089 &
US Patent 9,416,697
Developer of The IMS Retrofit Procedure- M96/ M97 Specialist
Jake Raby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2011, 03:56 AM   #11
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 97
A good example of harmonics

Sounds like this one has been goin' for a while, and it's all over but the cryin'.

In aviation, we take harmonics very seriously, and I am constantly amazed at the fatigue which is caused by seemingly unrelated components. As a very graphic demonstration on harmonic resonance, go to youtube and search "helicopter resonance CH-47" (I'm trying to avoid any copyright problems by not posting a link)

If you aren't already convinced of the dangeers, you will be after watching this. If I remember correctly, This was caused by one blade which was out of balance with the rest.
__________________
http://i1215.photobucket.com/albums/...dall/Car-1.jpg

2001 S Speed Yellow, matching interior, German Plates!!
Iflylow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2011, 03:27 PM   #12
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Depends on the day of the week....
Posts: 1,400
Quote:
Originally Posted by insite
You're assuming the aasco unit is balanced. I had mine done this week. The clutch / fw combo were 17g out of balance. 15g of that was the flywheel. That can break a crankshaft.

07proto - I use a sprung spec stage 1
That's interesting. When I had my AASCO flywheel/ SPEC pressure plate balanced to my crank, the pressure plate was off 2 grams, the flywheel was off 3 grams. That's more in line with the quality standards that I expect from top notch companies like AASCO or SPEC.
__________________
Boxster S
Cloudsurfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2011, 04:20 AM   #13
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,820
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cloudsurfer
That's interesting. When I had my AASCO flywheel/ SPEC pressure plate balanced to my crank, the pressure plate was off 2 grams, the flywheel was off 3 grams. That's more in line with the quality standards that I expect from top notch companies like AASCO or SPEC.

I have the printouts from the machine. I'll post them when I have a minute to scan them. I also took some pics of the fw with the material removed. I could feel / hear it over 4k rpm. The only reason I pulled the tranny was to balance.

Jake had another good point: the knock sensor can pick this up & dial back the timing.
__________________
insite
'99 Boxster
3.4L Conversion

http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t...1/KMTGPR-1.jpg
insite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2011, 08:41 AM   #14
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Depends on the day of the week....
Posts: 1,400
Quote:
Originally Posted by insite
I have the printouts from the machine. I'll post them when I have a minute to scan them. I also took some pics of the fw with the material removed. I could feel / hear it over 4k rpm. The only reason I pulled the tranny was to balance.

Jake had another good point: the knock sensor can pick this up & dial back the timing.
Never said I didn't believe ya Just sharing what my results were when I balanced. It would seem very plausible that the knock sensors could pick up this up if there was enough of it too.
__________________
Boxster S
Cloudsurfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page