Quote:
Originally Posted by dghii
The pictures of our saliors on their knees at the mercy of Iran Navy was all I needed.
What else isn't news now?
|
Oh yes, much better to have their bodies hanging from a bridge, right? At least Obama got them home alive. And by the way, where was it said that Obama paid Iran for them to be released? This mentions none of it:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_U.S.%E2%80%93Iran_naval_incident
Now let's talk about Reagan and the Iran hostages. He traded arms for the hostages AND said to keep them in captivity for MONTHS until AFTER the elections. If that doesn't rile you up, then you'll have to admit, it's not about the soldiers or hostages with you.
But I digress, let's see who was better overall for our troops; Reagan, Clinton, Bush, or Obama?
Want me to look at troop mortality & attacks on them under each president and report back to you? I think you already know.
Actually, I think Bush 41 did fairly well.
Threaded Mode
