10-02-2012, 09:28 AM
|
#1
|
Certified Boxster Addict
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,669
|
Underdrive Pulley Questions
I track my car extensively and an seriously looking at installing an underdrive pulley but I have two concerns and would like some feedback. Both questions are a result of the 100F+ temps that we've been having here in SoCal recently;
1. Engine Cooling - Does the UD pulley have any noticeable effect on engine temps (since the water pump isn't turning as fast as normal)?
2. Air Conditioning - Does the UD pulley have any noticeable effect on A/C cooling (since the A/C compressor isn't turning as fast as normal)?
Thanks to all.
__________________
1999 996 C2 - sold - bought back - sold for more
1997 Spec Boxster BSR #254
1979 911 SC
POC Licensed DE/TT Instructor
|
|
|
10-02-2012, 09:34 AM
|
#2
|
Ex Esso kid
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 1,605
|
Some claim the underpulley actually helps cooling, if I recall it was related to the water pump efficiency at a slower spin speed. My car never overheated as a result of the pulley, no issues whatsoever. As for the AC, it still worked well for NY now how would it be in Miami in August? I think you might notice a loss but you wouldn't be dying for AC. You will feel the underpulley difference immediately and the installation is pretty easy.
|
|
|
10-02-2012, 09:37 AM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 529
|
Underdrive pulley answers
1.- No
2.- No
Happy Boxstering,
Pedro
__________________
Racecar spelled backwards is: Racecar!
|
|
|
10-02-2012, 10:46 AM
|
#4
|
Engine Surgeon
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland GA USA
Posts: 2,425
|
I tested our 4" UD pulley for 2.5 years, even with a 28 channel data logger it was impossible to tell which plots came from the factory pulley or the UDP and that included different operating environments from mid teens to over 100F, both track and street. The biggest difference you'll see on the track is the temp of the power steering pump and fluid. We originally applied these pulleys in an effort to extend PS pump and fluid life on track.
We see a solid 5RWHP gain with every UDP that we install.
__________________
Jake Raby/www.flat6innovations.com
IMS Solution/ Faultless Tool Inventor
US Patent 8,992,089 &
US Patent 9,416,697
Developer of The IMS Retrofit Procedure- M96/ M97 Specialist
Last edited by Jake Raby; 10-02-2012 at 10:50 AM.
|
|
|
10-02-2012, 10:56 AM
|
#5
|
Ex Esso kid
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 1,605
|
That's what it was, the PS pump efficiency
|
|
|
10-02-2012, 01:31 PM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 1,665
|
Would you notice much increased effort on the steering wheel required at lower speeds due to the fewer RPMs on the PS pump, say while parking?
I'm considering it as well.
I spend most of my drive time above 2500 rpm and frequently peak it up in the 6k-7k region with spirited driving.
1st gear is a pain but Im starting to get the hang of it and not redlining anymore.
__________________
"It broke because it wants to be Upgraded ![Wink](http://www.986forum.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif) "
2012 Porsche Performance Driving School - SanDiego region
2001 Boxster S, Top Speed muffler, (Fred's) Mini Morimotto Projectors, Tarret UDP,
Short Shifter, Touch Screen Dual Din Radio, 03 4 Bow glass Top (DD & Auto-X since May 17,2012)
|
|
|
10-02-2012, 01:52 PM
|
#7
|
Track rat
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Southern ID
Posts: 3,701
|
I have seen no difference in coolant temp, A/C, or steering efficiency with the UD pulley. My car now has 102K miles, 70+ track days, and the original 14 yr old PS pump. I inspect it every oil change and no sign of failure yet.
__________________
2009 Cayman 2.9L PDK (with a few tweaks)
PCA-GPX Chief Driving Instructor-Ret.
|
|
|
10-03-2012, 06:57 AM
|
#8
|
Homeboy981
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Sherman, TX
Posts: 663
|
Great information guys! I will put the UD pulley on my "to-do" list!
I too was worried about "street-ability" of the mod. That is the only reason I have not pursued it.
Glad the question was posed to our resident experts. I wanted to ask, @thstone thanks for posing the ???. Happy to glean information where I can about our street-legal racecars!
Is the HP increase throughout the RPM range?
So that 5HP increase will drop our F-150 passing time by about a 1/10 of a sec or so. Yippie!
__________________
2002 Porsche Boxtser S - Silver & Chrome - Died from IMS failure AFTER IMS was replaced!
|
|
|
10-03-2012, 08:02 AM
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Frederick MD
Posts: 658
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Homeboy981
Great information guys! I will put the UD pulley on my "to-do" list!
I too was worried about "street-ability" of the mod. That is the only reason I have not pursued it.
Glad the question was posed to our resident experts. I wanted to ask, @thstone thanks for posing the ???. Happy to glean information where I can about our street-legal racecars!
Is the HP increase throughout the RPM range?
So that 5HP increase will drop our F-150 passing time by about a 1/10 of a sec or so. Yippie!
|
Disclaimer: I don't have an UD pulley...yet
But let's think about this critically. We are not talking about gains in engine horsepower, we are simply removing parasitic drag from the drive line so that more of the existing horsepower is transmitted to the rear wheels. So the gain at the wheels is equal to the drag removed from the engine minus whatever the drive train losses are. The drag being removed in this case is dynamic in nature as opposed to static. This means that the effort (read hp) to turn the pump increases as you turn it faster. So this leads me to believe that the HP gain at the rear wheels follows the same curve as the HP required to turn the pump does, across the rev range.
If this is in-fact the case, then no you would not see 5hp gain across the range. You would see little to no gain at idle with a progressive increase in gain as RPMs increase peaking at Jake's 5HP number at the top of the rev range.
Still, 5HP is 2% in my 02 S and in 2.5% in a base. While not huge, it is likely just enough to make the car feel like it has been awoken a bit. Kind of like when you go for a drive on a crisp 40df fall morning compared to a warm summer morning...the car just feels like it's doing everything a little bit better in the cool air...not a huge difference, just healthier.
|
|
|
10-03-2012, 08:27 AM
|
#10
|
Track rat
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Southern ID
Posts: 3,701
|
As a reliability mod I think this is worthwhile. Don't get too excited about hp gains though. My butt dyno is kinda old and worn out so I didn't feel a thing. Others get in my car and say "wow, fast 2.5L" but I don't notice much difference. The placebo effect can be a powerful drug.
__________________
2009 Cayman 2.9L PDK (with a few tweaks)
PCA-GPX Chief Driving Instructor-Ret.
Last edited by Topless; 10-03-2012 at 08:33 AM.
|
|
|
10-03-2012, 08:28 AM
|
#11
|
Carnut
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 775
|
My 100% non-scientific view is:-
No ill effects whatsoever and a bit more pep.
Go for it, as you see above no reason not to.....
__________________
'14 Boxster
|
|
|
10-03-2012, 08:42 AM
|
#12
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dubai
Posts: 62
|
What would this mod cost?
Thanks, Simon
|
|
|
10-03-2012, 09:18 AM
|
#13
|
Ex Esso kid
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 1,605
|
UP can be felt as soon as you accelerate, I wouldn't put gain numbers on it but you can feel the difference easily, that usually isn't the case with other 986 mods where you aren't sure if it just sounds faster.
As for cost, here's the one I had, might as well replace the roller bearings and you need a new belt so add about 40 extra.
RSS Underdrive Pulleys - RSS
Last edited by Ghostrider 310; 10-03-2012 at 09:22 AM.
|
|
|
10-03-2012, 12:00 PM
|
#14
|
1999 base
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Coral Springs FL
Posts: 1,617
|
|
|
|
10-03-2012, 12:04 PM
|
#15
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,128
|
This means that the effort (read hp) to turn the pump increases as you turn it faster
are you sure about that?
|
|
|
10-03-2012, 12:43 PM
|
#16
|
Certified Boxster Addict
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,669
|
Awesome, awesome! Thanks for all of the feedback and I just ordered the RSS UDP with the corrrect size belt from the guys at GSR.
__________________
1999 996 C2 - sold - bought back - sold for more
1997 Spec Boxster BSR #254
1979 911 SC
POC Licensed DE/TT Instructor
|
|
|
10-03-2012, 12:43 PM
|
#17
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Tejas/NorCal
Posts: 201
|
Be sure to use the harmonically dampened version if you have an engine swap/LWFW.
RSS Underdrive Pulleys - RSS
__________________
2001 Lapis Blue Boxster S Tip (stock), 2001 Guards Red Boxster 5-speed (not very stock)
|
|
|
10-03-2012, 01:16 PM
|
#18
|
Ex Esso kid
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 1,605
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by thstone
Awesome, awesome! Thanks for all of the feedback and I just ordered the RSS UDP with the corrrect size belt from the guys at GSR.
|
You have to saw a "nub" of Aluminum maybe half inch for accommodation for the new pulley. That nub has a threaded hole right under it (I think it's under) anyway the point is DO NOT ruin the threaded receiver during nub removal. Apparently it's important for locking cams? I don't remember I just remember Jake saying do not ruin it which is simple if you are aware of it. The Aluminum cuts like butter too so no need for a grinder or aggressive saws all, I hand sawed mine.
|
|
|
10-03-2012, 08:52 PM
|
#19
|
Certified Boxster Addict
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,669
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghostrider 310
You have to saw a "nub" of Aluminum maybe half inch for accommodation for the new pulley. That nub has a threaded hole right under it (I think it's under) anyway the point is DO NOT ruin the threaded receiver during nub removal. Apparently it's important for locking cams? I don't remember I just remember Jake saying do not ruin it which is simple if you are aware of it. The Aluminum cuts like butter too so no need for a grinder or aggressive saws all, I hand sawed mine.
|
Ghost - thanks for the installation tip! Sometimes knowing what NOT to do is just as important as knowing what TO do.
__________________
1999 996 C2 - sold - bought back - sold for more
1997 Spec Boxster BSR #254
1979 911 SC
POC Licensed DE/TT Instructor
|
|
|
10-03-2012, 11:27 PM
|
#20
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SoCAL
Posts: 238
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghostrider 310
You have to saw a "nub" of Aluminum maybe half inch for accommodation for the new pulley. That nub has a threaded hole right under it (I think it's under) anyway the point is DO NOT ruin the threaded receiver during nub removal. Apparently it's important for locking cams? I don't remember I just remember Jake saying do not ruin it which is simple if you are aware of it. The Aluminum cuts like butter too so no need for a grinder or aggressive saws all, I hand sawed mine.
|
The hole is for the pin that locks the crankshaft at TDC (or 180 degrees from it), and is not threaded.
The point is not to cut the boss off completely; cut enough the clear the smaller UDP, but leave some to accomodate the locking pin.
However, keep in mind that the locking pin cannot be used once the UDP is on there. So, if you need to do anything that requires the crankshaft to be locked at TDC (such as replacing the IMS bearing), do it before you install the UDP. Otherwise, you must devise an scheme to lock the crankshaft from the flywheel end.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:31 PM.
| |