You know whats nice ?

[ohioboxster]

Perfectlap,
I didnt put it in the lounge in case a smoker wanted to read it, duh.

[wetstuff]

P-L ...I could not have said it better.

The local hospital where my wife works - as of Jan1 - will not allow smoking on any of their grounds..including the sidewalks around the property...outlying parking lots, etc. "You junkies: stay off our property!" (I was one....)

j i m

[Perfectlap]

Originally Posted by ohioboxster

Perfectlap,
I didnt put it in the lounge in case a smoker wanted to read it, duh.

good one.

put it in the hperbearic chamber forum. The smokers there haven't seen daylight since November.

p.s.
I was a big cigar poser for years. You know, ocassionaly smoked cigars with wine.
Not a hardcore daily smoker. I even met the editor of cigar afficionado Marvin something or other. I was partial to torpedos with less draw. I once attended a cigar tasting where we smoked five kinds of cigars, had 7 kinds of wines and had a six course meal after a cocktail reception of Sherry and other fine food. The restarant was somewhat infamous as it was blown up on an episode of the Sopranos. I was so blasted on nicotine and alcohol when I stumbled out of there... and some guys do that every weekend!

[Perfectlap]

There are tons of cocktail, barterder and waiter jobs in AC (as well as Las Vegas) that can be found outside of casinos. Those workers have a choice, chase the big tips of whales and risk their health or make less money where the air isn't lethal.
Reminds me of the movie "Thank You for not Smoking". At some point personal choice and responsibility kicks in.
Although I would like to be in a Casino for a few hours without both killing myself and and my bank account.

[z12358]

Businesses lobbying against anti-smoking laws are really short-sighted, in my view. How do they know that those laws will actually hurt their business? With the public's awareness rising and the number of smokers dwindling, how do they know that "smoking allowed" isn't actually hurting business by turning away the rising number of clients who'd prefer a smoke free venue?

Before the smoking ban in NYC, many venue owners were afraid that they'd go bankrupt from the anticipated drop in patronage. Instead, three years later, I bet neither of them would allow smoking even if the ban was lifted -- in fear of losing the patrons who appreciate the cleaner air. Why should casinos be any different?

Z.

[Perfectlap]

99.9% of casino regulars smoke, drink and wear silk shirts and or some article of gold.

[z12358]

Originally Posted by Perfectlap

99.9% of casino regulars smoke, drink and wear silk shirts and or some article of gold.

Wouldn't that (ex silk & gold ) have been also true for the bar regulars in NYC before the smoking ban?

[Perfectlap]

Originally Posted by z12358

Wouldn't that (ex silk & gold ) have been also true for the bar regulars in NYC before the smoking ban?

only in the outerboroughs (Brooklyn, Staten Island), New Jersey and Lawng Island. Manhattan has become so yuppy its reaching an all time high. A serious crime hasn't been reported since last year when this 27 year old I-banker had her vespa parked around the corner from where she left in Soho by some prankster.
just the other day I withdrew $20,000 from the bank to pay my auto insurance for the next six months and I waved all that cash at everyone on the street and some people told me to stop begging and panhandling.

[C5150]

I smoked for 10 years. In college, my town went smokeless. Then got a job up in Seattle. Then Washington went smokeless.

I quit just before the change here in Wash. I was VERY pro-smoking in bars. Figured that smokers have lost most all their rights as it is (can pretty much only smoke in bars and bowling alleys), they should just let smoking stay along side drinking. But I'll have to say - I never realized as a smoker just how bad it smells in bars until I quit. My nose was numb to just how strong of a smell smoking creates.

Been off the sin-sticks for a year now, and have to agree. It's quite nice having non-smoking establishments.

I say the put smokers into a glass box like they do at the airports. As an old smoker - it wouldn't upset me at all - just as long as I didn't have to stand outside in the rain (20 feet min. from the entrance please!).

[super66]

being in a band I love when we hit a state that bans smoking....you at first don't realize it but then you start to notice something is different.....long live the ban, its starting in chicago too.....about time

[CJ_Boxster]

I smoke about once every 6 months, usually outside a bar, at nite, when im on edge. relaxes my legs and i feel like i just got a dose of feel good drugs or whatever they give women that are in labor

[Perfectlap]

I'm sure smokers don't visit doctors too often because if they did they'd stop smoking. I remember Dr. Oz showing preserved lungs from dead smokers..frightening.
But public health care is tapped. "Cost shifting" where a patient without any coverage (out of work smokers) has all of his smoking realted treament bills shifted to that working patient who ends up paying $2,500 for a three hour emergency room visit for a mere bad-aid. This isn't accounted for in these studies because no one at these hospitals and treatment centers admti to borrowing from "Peter to pay for Paul" when they bill the carriers when medicare runs out. The "double books" of the hopital industry...

Now as far as lost tax revenues, consider that every single day a plane load of workers die. That (according to CDC) results in a loss of $92 Billion in lost productivity every year. The average smoker can count on going to grave 14 years earlier than he should have.
Tell a smoker you know to stop smoking today.

Why do cigarette smokers throw their butts out in the sidewalks and streets, or when driving they throw them out the window? This irritates me as much, if not more, than the actual second-hand smoke.

It shocks me that young people today start smoking, with everything we know about the health risks associated with cigarettes. But, I guess they feel invincible.

[MNBoxster]

Hi,

If Health concerns were the only factor, the answer is simple - make cigarettes illegal. But, the issue is much more complex than that.

The Tobacco issue is really one of Money, Power, Political Capital and Clout, not to mention tremendous hypocrisy.

The Governments (State and Federal) rely on some $26 B annually in Cigarette Taxes, while they grant $600 M in annual subsidies to Tobacco Growers.

Frankly, I'm surprised that Michael Moore hasn't reared his ugly head over the issue, must have put the $400M he got from Farenheit 9/11 into R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company stock.

And has anyone really calculated the cost of eliminating Cigarettes? Think of the lost Revenue. The number of retail and shipping jobs which would be eliminated, not to mention the glut of out-of-work Healthcare Workers who'd be bagging groceries as their only means of supporting their families? And, Motorsports? Bye-bye.

Then there's the hypocrisy of those here who are appalled at the Smoking issue, all the while condoning, and even counseling, others how to defeat their Emissions Controls and even run straight pipes out the back of their Boxsters (I wonder what the Health risks are from secondhand Exhaust?).

The one thing I'm pretty sure of, at least the last time I checked, was that this is a board dedicated to Boxster Ownership and Enthusiasm. I find no relevance to having this discussion here and think Rich should padlock this thread. There are any number of forums and blogs for people to air their views in a more appropriate setting. As always, just my humble $0.02...

Happy Motoring!... Jim'99

[Perfectlap]

Originally Posted by MNBoxster

......And has anyone really calculated the cost of eliminating Cigarettes?
Happy Motoring!... Jim'99

it depends how much of a value the law makers place on human life.
And for the pragmatic types, consider the lost/lower wages of people sitting in hospitals or on disability because they now can't walk half a block due to complications from emphysyma(sp?) and chronic bronchitis. To say nothing of the 'gateway' drug issue.

Its like the old saying "you can pay now or you can pay me later but in the end you will pay". We are all paying for that Tobacco revenue. Healthcare costs in this country are cippling this country's fiscal future and cigarette smoking and unhealthy diets are MAJOR factors in the most out of shape and banged up generation of Americans this nation has seen in a who knows how long.

but I agree this issue belongs in the Lounge is anywhere.

[MNBoxster]

Originally Posted by Perfectlap

it depends how much of a value the law makers place on human life.
And for the pragmatic types, consider the lost/lower wages of people sitting in hospitals or on disability because they now can't walk half a block due to complications from emphysyma(sp?) and chronic bronchitis. To say nothing of the 'gateway' drug issue.

Its like the old saying "you can pay now or you can pay me later but in the end you will pay". We are all paying for that Tobacco revenue. Healthcare costs in this country are cippling this country's fiscal future and cigarette smoking and unhealthy diets are MAJOR factors in the most out of shape and banged up generation of Americans this nation has seen in a who knows how long.

but I agree this issue belongs in the Lounge is anywhere.

Hi,

Actually, a study by the Harvard Medical School last year concluded that Smokers do not over tax the Healthcare system. The report concluded that the average Smoker is less Health-conscious (and consequently makes fewer visits to a doctor or Healthcare institution), and when they eventually do, it's usually a short-lived Healthcare consumption because their disease is usually well-advanced by that time. They die sooner on average than non-smokers so they actually consume fewer Healthcare dollars than the average non-Smoker does over a much longer timeframe.

That Smokers increase the cost of Healthcare is a myth supported by the Anti-Smoking lobby as a scare tactic to promote their views.

I am a non-Smoker. I do not support Smoking. But, I have serious concerns about the way our institutions and legislators have used this explosive issue to advance their own causes and agenda and add further limits to personal choice. My last words on the subject...

Happy Motoring!... Jim'99

[jeffsquire]

Originally Posted by Perfectlap

it depends how much of a value the law makers place on human life. . . . .We are all paying for that Tobacco revenue. Healthcare costs in this country are cippling this country's fiscal future and cigarette smoking and unhealthy diets are MAJOR factors in the most out of shape and banged up generation of Americans this nation has seen in a who knows how long.

_________________________
Following this argument to its logical extension then. . . .we should put limits on horspower on cars so they won't drive so fast, people will kill themselves driving fast. .. . .young people shouldnt drive until they're 25 since the risk of accidents at that age substantially decreases prompting isurance carriers to lowering their costs to insuring vehicles and drivers.

ditto with speedlimts. 70 mph is safe but 55 mph is safer. .. . but 20 mph is even safer!! It would save fuel too, and we'd be less oil dependent, so there's a triple benefit. While we're at it, all lights across the country should be turned off at 11pm, because it's not "safe" for you since you can't be up to any good after that hour and you're more likely to be caught for drinking and driving after that hour..

oh yeah, since 20 mph is safest cars should be lined with titanium reinforced block cages. . . . becasue if you get in an accident at that low speed you'd be more likely to survive.

In europe they smoke EVERYWHERE, airports, bars, sections of hospitals, burgerkings, McDonalds, public arenas, public buildings, yet they live as long if not lslightly longer than americans. (They serve alcohol in BK and McD's as well, even in front of all those innocent children.)

They should ban drinking, since people WILL drink and drive (oh yeah, we already tried that), or maybe even ban drinking until one is 30 years old since that will reduce risk even more. . . or would it?

Houses should be built underground and of concrete in hurricane-prone areas, since they are "safest."

Twinkies, cupcakes, sweets, softdrinks should be banned as well because they make us fat, and if you're fat your more likely to get diabetes, heart disease, and die younger thus rasining healthcare costs, thus "crippling" the "fiscal" future of our economy, unless of course we have national healthcare like they do in Europe and canada where they smoke everywhere, where drinking ages are much lower and they have higher speed limits than here.

IMHO the antismoking drive has nothing to do with health only control and regulation.

Light em up.