Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Boxster General Discussions

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-13-2018, 12:37 PM   #1
Registered User
 
steved0x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: FL
Posts: 4,144
Quote:
Originally Posted by gabedrummin View Post
and he starts yelling at me telling me theat L&N IMS has a higher failure rate than OEM. And EPS cylindrical roller is the only fix and he has 50 motor's that had L&N bearings go bad
That sounds like salemanship, if they were that bad and failed that much they would be out of business. They have 50 motors with failed LN bearings? I don't even think there have been 50 failures worldwide, let alone just 50 at this vendor.

I would be interested to see the article.

If you really want to resolve it once and for all, LN IMS Solution. That said, I am on just the regular dual row LN ceramic retrofit for the last 40,000 miles/5 years and it has been working out.

I though RND engines came with their own version of the roller bearing anyway and not the LN ceramic retrofit? So if the EPS guy says cylindrical roller bearings are the best, you might have one already

Roller Bearing IMS Retrofit Kit – RND Engines

There is no way that 50 of these have failed in the last few years since RND came out.
steved0x is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2018, 02:18 PM   #2
Beginner
 
Jamesp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,659
Garage
I've been pretty impressed with LN products, but not so much that I've bought any. I simply put a high quality high temp single row back in to replace the failed one from my engine. Replaced the intermediate shaft with my modified version while I was in there. I do prefer the ball bearing over the roller as its design seems more tolerant of contamination, point versus line contact. That's purely speculation however.
__________________
2003 S manual
Jamesp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2018, 03:13 PM   #3
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Cambria, CA
Posts: 121
Garage
I put a dual row direct oil feed ims bearing in from Tunersmall.com in my 2000 S. Seemed to be a good product. No problems so far-installed last January. It is pretty much the same as the dof product from LN (not the "Solution"), just uses a different oil source.
I am currently putting in a LN Solution in my 2002 base. Paid about $500 more than the Tunersmall.com product although it comes with a spin on oil filter adapter which the Tunersmall.com product doesn't include. The "Solution" seems to be a stupidly simple idea. Makes me wonder why Porsche didn't choose that route. Interestingly, the LN warranty materials suggest that there is no coverage for a DIY installation.
dlud is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page