Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Boxster General Discussions

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-22-2013, 05:38 PM   #1
Registered User
 
Jager's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: California
Posts: 1,859
Garage
That is the strangest shaped piston I have ever seen... And the motor was still running??
__________________
Jäger

300K Mile Club
Jager is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2013, 05:52 PM   #2
Engine Surgeon
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland GA USA
Posts: 2,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jager View Post
That is the strangest shaped piston I have ever seen... And the motor was still running??
This engine ran absolutely fine.. Zero smoke, zero oil consumption and no cylinder symptoms, just a tick..tick..tick.

It fooled two dealerships and three other shops before the owner decided to ship it 1,000 miles to us. We diagnosed it in less than 30 minutes. Now he is getting a big bore and is part of our 13 month backlog!
__________________
Jake Raby/www.flat6innovations.com
IMS Solution/ Faultless Tool Inventor
US Patent 8,992,089 &
US Patent 9,416,697
Developer of The IMS Retrofit Procedure- M96/ M97 Specialist
Jake Raby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2013, 06:52 PM   #3
pk2
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Tustin Ca.
Posts: 449
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jake Raby View Post
This engine ran absolutely fine.. Zero smoke, zero oil consumption and no cylinder symptoms, just a tick..tick..tick.

It fooled two dealerships and three other shops before the owner decided to ship it 1,000 miles to us. We diagnosed it in less than 30 minutes. Now he is getting a big bore and is part of our 13 month backlog!
It seems your saying these motors are crap. Do any, in your opinion, survive to 50k? I've no interest in dropping 10k into a $18k car. 28 grand, for what? That would buy something far more contemporary without any hassle I should think.

When did Porsche get their _hit together on these motors?

Regards, PK
__________________
http://img87.imageshack.us/img87/163...58x6ir4.th.jpg
99 Supercharged 2.5L
pk2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2013, 03:57 AM   #4
Engine Surgeon
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland GA USA
Posts: 2,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by pk2 View Post
It seems your saying these motors are crap. Do any, in your opinion, survive to 50k? I've no interest in dropping 10k into a $18k car. 28 grand, for what? That would buy something far more contemporary without any hassle I should think.

When did Porsche get their _hit together on these motors?

Regards, PK
No, just stating what we see routinely. You must understand that we do not see best case scenarios, we do not do normal work at a normal shop level. All that we see is extreme and has usually already been manipulated by other shops that don't have a clue, so we have to pick up the pieces and start from scratch.

What I was stating more than anything is the bigger, later engines are NOT any better than those that preceded them, contrary to popular belief. These engines have proven to be some of the most problematic with the most failure modes.

All M96 and M97 engines are created equally and none are better or worse than others, it seems.

The DFI 9a1 engines have been our focus for the past 3 years already, I recently tore into one with 4100 miles to carry out our big bore process that increases displacement from 3.4 to 4.2 liters. The engine had no symptoms and was being built bigger for "no reason at all". We carried out a "before dyno" prior to disassembly so we could have a comparative after our work is finished. The dyno results were the lowest we'd seen from any DFI 3.4 Cayman spec engine and even a track engine with 14K miles on it (all on track) had beaten it. Upon disassembly I found two missing O rings from the oil system, a broken piston ring, scored cylinders and worn out lifters. I have documented all of this, and the engine had never even had its first oil service and had never been to the track.

BTW- We currently have 13 months worth of engines to create and of those only 5-6 of the cars have more street value than what is being spent on my reconstructed engines. The people that look our way have a different way of placing a value on their car. Since 1992 I have been building engines for customers that are spending more on my engine than the entire car is worth- thats nothing new with Porsches. The reason they don't care is because they never sell the car, so what the vehicle is worth is only determined by how much time in service it gives them.

I have a 2014 GT3 on the way here and it will have only 3-4K miles on it when we strip the engine down to make it as large as efficiently possible. We'll know more about it in just a few months and I am positive we'll have our hands inside one of these before anyone outside the factory (again).
__________________
Jake Raby/www.flat6innovations.com
IMS Solution/ Faultless Tool Inventor
US Patent 8,992,089 &
US Patent 9,416,697
Developer of The IMS Retrofit Procedure- M96/ M97 Specialist
Jake Raby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2013, 07:32 AM   #5
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: BC
Posts: 1,346
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jake Raby View Post
We currently have 13 months worth of engines to create
So much for one of Jake's engines as an alternative.
__________________
2001 Boxster, 5 spd, Seal Grey
clickman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2013, 07:40 AM   #6
Engine Surgeon
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland GA USA
Posts: 2,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by clickman View Post
So much for one of Jake's engines as an alternative.
I've closed the performance engine program until we catch up. We have sold 5 months worth of engines in the last two months.

Each engine we create requires over 105 hours to complete, because we carry out install, dyno, tuning, invasive post inspection and etc. This is not something where we stock engines that are generic and just ship them away- thats how an engine builder loses a reputation quickly and even more so with these engines. The competitors that have grown on our coat tails are learning this one by one and taking themselves out one by one.

It takes as long as it takes and I refuse to compromise quality just to create more engines.
__________________
Jake Raby/www.flat6innovations.com
IMS Solution/ Faultless Tool Inventor
US Patent 8,992,089 &
US Patent 9,416,697
Developer of The IMS Retrofit Procedure- M96/ M97 Specialist
Jake Raby is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page