06-03-2013, 07:35 AM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Little Switzerland, north carolina
Posts: 551
|
low temp thermostat brands
There are quite a few different brands of low temp thermostats and quite a diversity of pricing. What brands have you guys had good results or bsf results with?
|
|
|
06-03-2013, 07:56 AM
|
#2
|
Certified Boxster Addict
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,669
|
I used the LTT from Pelican Parts (comes with the water pump in a kit). Works great.
__________________
1999 996 C2 - sold - bought back - sold for more
1997 Spec Boxster BSR #254
1979 911 SC
POC Licensed DE/TT Instructor
|
|
|
06-03-2013, 08:46 AM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 29
|
I'm not by any means a Boxster afficionado. I DO, however, have LOTS of wrenching and car experience going back to my Dad's indie shop beginning in elementary school.
Given the issue with the IMS bearings affected by sludge, it does not AT ALL appear that these engines would be a good candidate for a low temp thermostat. Whatever gain you might expect in whatever area, would almost certainly be negated by the increased tendency for sludging as a result of a low temp thermostat.
With sludge being such an enemy of the critical IMS bearing, this sounds like a VERY bad idea to me.
My $0.02,
__________________
Doc
Hope to soon be among the lucky few driving a Boxster.
|
|
|
06-03-2013, 09:20 AM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: BC
Posts: 1,329
|
I put in the LN Eng low temp thermo.
MBDiag, please refer to the many threads where this has been discussed and the conclusion is that it is a good idea.
__________________
2001 Boxster, 5 spd, Seal Grey
|
|
|
06-03-2013, 09:33 AM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Champaign, IL
Posts: 355
|
MBDiagMan...I would leave it at your first line,"I'm not by any means a Boxster afficionado."
It is the general consensus that the low temp thermostat is must in the Boxster, otherwise Porsche would not have seen it as a necessity to run it in their higher end cars. My opinion is that the accountants had too much say on the design and production process.
I went with the one offered through Flat-6
__________________
Lov'n my boxster!
2013 Lexus IS350awd
2007 Toyota FJ Cruiser
2004 Porsche Boxster S
|
|
|
06-03-2013, 09:40 AM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 29
|
What temp stat comes from the factory?
__________________
Doc
Hope to soon be among the lucky few driving a Boxster.
|
|
|
06-03-2013, 09:43 AM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Champaign, IL
Posts: 355
|
A quote directly from Pelican Parts Tech Articles.
"The factory thermostat starts to open at about 187° F (86° C) and only fully opens at almost 210° F (99° C). This means that the engine needs to get very hot before it starts sending its coolant to the front radiators. For this reason, I recommend installing a low temperature thermostat in place of the factory one. For example, LN Engineering developed a thermostat (now discontinued but similar thermostats are currently available) that began opening at 160° F (71° C) and fully opened at about 180° F (82° C); lower coolant temperatures translate into lower oil temperatures. It is my guess that Porsche designed the thermostat to open a bit later in order to help the cars run a bit hotter, which typically helps with emissions testing and the burning off of water out of the oil, which can then lead to longer oil change intervals. Installing the low-temp thermostat is a smart idea for engine longevity:"
__________________
Lov'n my boxster!
2013 Lexus IS350awd
2007 Toyota FJ Cruiser
2004 Porsche Boxster S
|
|
|
06-03-2013, 09:51 AM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: BC
Posts: 1,329
|
I also took JFP in PA's advice and replaced the stock oil cooler on my base car with the S version.
__________________
2001 Boxster, 5 spd, Seal Grey
|
|
|
06-03-2013, 09:53 AM
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Nor cal
Posts: 33
|
I had the LN Engineering Low Temp thermostat installed when I had my IMS upgrade done. It was highly recommended by the indie shop (one that LN recommended) that did the install. I see the thermostat is still available on the LN website as is the technical data as to why it is recommended. Are you sure it has been discontinued?
Josh
__________________
2004 550 Special Edition 6sp
|
|
|
06-03-2013, 10:06 AM
|
#10
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: It's a kind of magic.....
Posts: 6,531
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MBDiagMan
Given the issue with the IMS bearings affected by sludge, it does not AT ALL appear that these engines would be a good candidate for a low temp thermostat. Whatever gain you might expect in whatever area, would almost certainly be negated by the increased tendency for sludging as a result of a low temp thermostat.
With sludge being such an enemy of the critical IMS bearing, this sounds like a VERY bad idea to me.
|
With many 160 stats installed, we are yet to see any signs of sludge in the sump after many, many miles.....................old wives' tale.
__________________
“Anything really new is invented only in one’s youth. Later, one becomes more experienced, more famous – and more stupid.” - Albert Einstein
|
|
|
06-03-2013, 12:34 PM
|
#11
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 29
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JFP in PA
With many 160 stats installed, we are yet to see any signs of sludge in the sump after many, many miles.....................old wives' tale.
|
Very good to know. With more conventional engines and engine positions, I have most definitely seen a lower oil temperature result in a sludging condition requiring more frequent oil changes.
It is easier to understand why things would be different in these cars given the engine and radiator positions and the relative positions of the two.
It's good to see that there is plenty of attention paid to the issue.
__________________
Doc
Hope to soon be among the lucky few driving a Boxster.
|
|
|
06-03-2013, 12:38 PM
|
#12
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 29
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tnoice
MBDiagMan...I would leave it at your first line,"I'm not by any means a Boxster afficionado."
It is the general consensus that the low temp thermostat is must in the Boxster, otherwise Porsche would not have seen it as a necessity to run it in their higher end cars. My opinion is that the accountants had too much say on the design and production process.
I went with the one offered through Flat-6
|
And that's exactly why I started my post with the disclaimer.
__________________
Doc
Hope to soon be among the lucky few driving a Boxster.
|
|
|
06-03-2013, 03:56 PM
|
#13
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Champaign, IL
Posts: 355
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MBDiagMan
And that's exactly why I started my post with the disclaimer.
|
I might have come off harsh, but I did truly appreciate the disclaimer. We live in a world of everyone constantly giving advice (some correct....some incorrect), and it a breath of fresh air when a disclaimer accompanies the advice.
__________________
Lov'n my boxster!
2013 Lexus IS350awd
2007 Toyota FJ Cruiser
2004 Porsche Boxster S
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:27 PM.
| |