05-14-2015, 06:22 PM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2014
Location: S.California
Posts: 2,029
|
Pelican has the correct part number- the latest that Radium kindly mentions:
996-107-023-04. They offer a choice of OEM or the much cheaper URO brand.Anybody care to comment on the URO ? It is 1/2 price!
Has anyone got a specific recommendation for a catch can to use and experience of how well it works ? I have used them on other vehicles and found them excellent if you position them intelligently.
There is not much room but wondered if anyone had tried this?Has 12AN fittings.
Pro Series Baffled Oil Catch Can Honda Civic Acura Integra 6 Port Black 12 An | eBay
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Radium King
what you can do is take the pipe that runs from your aos to your intake and route it through an afternarket air/oil seperator OR an oil catchcan then back to your intake. this way, if your primary aos fails, you have some pre-warning that something is afoot and can take action before hydrolock, smoke bombs, etc. the other thing to note is that the aos has several iterations as porsche improved the design; make sure you have the latest (latest version is .04, although there is as version for the +03 models that may fit as well ...).
|
|
|
|
05-15-2015, 07:10 PM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 210
|
I was talking to a guy with a cayman s at the track a few weeks ago. his solution was to remove the upper vent line and plug the hole at the throttle and the one on the top of the AOS. He said that the AOS was basically just a emissions thing and did not effect performance etc.. so by blocking it off it prevented any oil from getting into the intake and had no negative side effects other than increased tailpipe emissions.
From what I understand about how the AOS works, I think his logic is sound, just not sure I would take the chance on mine without knowing for 100% that it would not harm the engine.
|
|
|
05-15-2015, 07:40 PM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2014
Location: S.California
Posts: 2,029
|
Kiyak,
Interesting story,thanks for sharing.
Logically, you could just put a partial restrictor in that line. That would reduce the quantity of oil that could pass. It would allow fumes to pass as normal. The tree-huggers may prefer that?
|
|
|
05-15-2015, 07:50 PM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 210
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelbster
Kiyak,
Interesting story,thanks for sharing.
Logically, you could just put a partial restrictor in that line. That would reduce the quantity of oil that could pass. It would allow fumes to pass as normal. The tree-huggers may prefer that?
|
If I was going to do it I would put a shut-off in line of the upper vent line. that way I could just shut it off at the track, and back on for normal driving. beats $800 for the track AOS.
|
|
|
05-16-2015, 04:05 PM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sanford NC
Posts: 2,573
|
Isn't the AOS also there to release crankcase pressure by allowing the venting of mist and separating out its components? Without the AOS to allow the venting, where else would the pressure go?
|
|
|
05-16-2015, 04:50 PM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Queensland, Australia
Posts: 1,522
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikefocke
Isn't the AOS also there to release crankcase pressure by allowing the venting of mist and separating out its components? Without the AOS to allow the venting, where else would the pressure go?
|
Probably through the crankshaft oil seals (whistling sound) or up past the piston rings. 
Remember the M96 engines have a relatively light piston ring pressure compared to older engines - it wouldn't take much positive crankcase pressure to force them back with not very nice consequences.....
__________________
2001 Boxster S (triple black). Sleeping easier with LN Engineering/Flat 6 IMS upgrade, low temp thermostat & underspeed pulley.
2001 MV Agusta F4.
|
|
|
05-16-2015, 07:25 PM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2014
Location: S.California
Posts: 2,029
|
Steven,
I agree with you. And you may get a Check Engine Light/fail Smog?
But I think he mean't just for the Track?
That is why I suggested trying:
"Logically, you could just put a partial restrictor in that line. That would reduce the quantity of oil that could pass. It would allow fumes to pass as normal."
|
|
|
05-17-2015, 02:29 PM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: O.C. CA
Posts: 3,709
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelbster
Kiyak,
Interesting story,thanks for sharing.
Logically, you could just put a partial restrictor in that line. That would reduce the quantity of oil that could pass. It would allow fumes to pass as normal. The tree-huggers may prefer that?
|
I'm afraid that would cause a stronger vacuum signal, one of these days I'm going to try & increase the diameter of the connecting hose.
__________________
OE engine rebuilt,3.6 litre LN Engineering billet sleeves,triple row IMSB,LN rods. Deep sump oil pan with DT40 oil.
|
|
|
05-17-2015, 05:22 PM
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 210
|
I think I agree with you guys. might work, but I would prefer not to take the chance.
|
|
|
09-07-2015, 04:24 PM
|
#10
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NZ
Posts: 1
|
jml - what fittings did you use for A-A and B-B? Even a sketch of what you did would be helpful
G :-)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:59 PM.
| |