Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Performance and Technical Chat

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 03-08-2006, 09:10 AM   #11
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota, USA
Posts: 3,308
Hi,

I seriously doubt that CEL's or lower MPG was caused by desnorkelling. It's only function is to reduce Intake Noise to comply with European Noise Abatement Ordinances.

There's a lot of Urban Myth surrounding this innocuous ABS Tube.

It does not allow Cooler Air to enter the Engine, the difference isn't significant enough to alter the Engine performance.

It does not allow more air to enter the Intake because the Throttle Body controls this, so the DME does not demand more Fuel consumption.

It cannot trigger a CEL because nothing is affected by it's presence or absence except Sound Waves. Removing it may jostle a component or two (especially something as sensitive as a Hot Film MAF) causing them to trigger a CEL, but that's a function of one's removal technique rather than the absence of the Snorkle itself.

All reports to the contrary are TOTALLY Anecdotal, and people are seeing Cause & Effect where there simply is none...

Happy Motoring!... Jim'99
MNBoxster is offline   Reply With Quote
 



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page