10-17-2011, 06:11 PM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: O.C. CA
Posts: 3,709
|
2001 3.6 engine build
Finally able to post pictures on 986 forum so here's some of my latest engine build:
|
|
|
10-17-2011, 06:22 PM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: O.C. CA
Posts: 3,709
|
Crankshaft & housing, LN IMS ceramic bearing, billet flange & shaft with balanced connecting rods & ARP bolts #4,5&6 installed into crankcase half.
|
|
|
10-17-2011, 06:49 PM
|
#3
|
Porscheectomy
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Seattle Area
Posts: 3,011
|
You have cool toys to play with. What are you going to do for engine management?
|
|
|
10-17-2011, 07:05 PM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: O.C. CA
Posts: 3,709
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by blue2000s
You have cool toys to play with. What are you going to do for engine management?
|
Original Variocam ECU can compensate for the additional airflow, so no changes requred to run in 2000=2002 Boxster or 2000-2001 996
|
|
|
10-17-2011, 07:47 PM
|
#5
|
Porscheectomy
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Seattle Area
Posts: 3,011
|
So you'll be using the heads from a 3.2 or 3.4?
|
|
|
10-18-2011, 07:07 AM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: O.C. CA
Posts: 3,709
|
The heads are from a 3.2 & I think they are the same as a 3.4, I know the cams are the same.
|
|
|
10-19-2011, 08:22 AM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: O.C. CA
Posts: 3,709
|
JE Pistons & short pins ready for install
|
|
|
10-19-2011, 04:30 PM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 15
|
Details, plans, expected output??
|
|
|
10-20-2011, 09:49 AM
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: O.C. CA
Posts: 3,709
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by blackadder
Details, plans, expected output??
|
I took the flat6innovations M96 engine rebuilding course, so I am basically copying their Stage 1 engine using LNengineering parts. I am in CA so engine will pass CA emissions test easily & add about 40 ft./lbs. torque @ lower rpm than stock. I already have a duplicate engine in my 2000S so if I don't find a 996 to put this engine in soon I will sell the engine to someone else.
|
|
|
10-28-2011, 09:10 AM
|
#10
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: O.C. CA
Posts: 3,709
|
Cam Timing set:
|
|
|
11-02-2011, 03:24 PM
|
#11
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: O.C. CA
Posts: 3,709
|
Engine oil baffle windows enlarged to aid oil flow to pickup area.
|
|
|
01-31-2012, 09:47 AM
|
#12
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: O.C. CA
Posts: 3,709
|
This 2001 3.6 longblock for sale $14,000
|
|
|
02-01-2012, 06:06 PM
|
#13
|
02 box s
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: alabama
Posts: 226
|
Pro river, did you do all of the upgrades to chain tensioners,etc? Would you mind listing all of the build specs. 14k. Seems like a good price for someone lookig to upgrade and address all of the failure modes
|
|
|
02-03-2012, 08:49 AM
|
#14
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: O.C. CA
Posts: 3,709
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sgt brad
Pro river, did you do all of the upgrades to chain tensioners,etc? Would you mind listing all of the build specs. 14k. Seems like a good price for someone lookig to upgrade and address all of the failure modes
|
Sgt, every part of the engine is cleaned & inspected for wear from the case to the bearings & bolts. Anything that can be upgraded is replaced with the best part available. New cam chains, IMS chain tensioner with the external preload spring, LN billet oil pump driveshaft, LN triplerow ceramic IMS bearing upgrade, New IMS chain tensioner paddle, New Cam tensioner wear pads, ARP rod bolts. Lifters & chain tensioners cleaned & tested in new oil heated to 275degrees.All recipricating parts dynamicaly balanced to half gram tolerance. Engine fully prelubed for initial startup including filling oil filter housing & pump & camshafts. Let me know if there are other build specs you are looking for.
Last edited by BYprodriver; 02-03-2012 at 08:53 AM.
Reason: Balance info
|
|
|
02-10-2012, 12:16 PM
|
#15
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Alta Loma, CA
Posts: 1,334
|
I have built this same engine, and I have also made 295hp with a 3.2 (and passes CA smog without issue) The 3.6 conversion doesn't impress me. For 10k a CaymanS engine will make 340hp.
We even went out of our way and did a CaymanS intake on the 3.4 heads... and large tube exhaust... The bottle neck is the heads/cams..
B
|
|
|
02-10-2012, 01:23 PM
|
#16
|
02 box s
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: alabama
Posts: 226
|
to run the cayman s motor you have to have the variocam plus dme though right? i've been down the road of having to rework the engine mgt system to make it work and don't want to do that again. it seems to me that the bigger disp on the stock m96 would work well for me. i just find it hard to believe that it takes 20k+ to make 300 or so hp. factor in a full exhaust and ipd/pedro/etc intake and add another 5k to that number. 25k for 330hp? really? i guess it's really closer to 375 at the crank and that is some solace. but, still.......
|
|
|
02-10-2012, 01:59 PM
|
#17
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: O.C. CA
Posts: 3,709
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brad Roberts
I have built this same engine, and I have also made 295hp with a 3.2 (and passes CA smog without issue) The 3.6 conversion doesn't impress me. For 10k a CaymanS engine will make 340hp.
We even went out of our way and did a CaymanS intake on the 3.4 heads... and large tube exhaust... The bottle neck is the heads/cams..
B
|
Engine design is always compromising one end of the rpm range or the other.
|
|
|
02-11-2012, 04:12 AM
|
#18
|
Engine Surgeon
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland GA USA
Posts: 2,425
|
The 3.6 big bore does impress me... Even with stock camshaft profiles (with altered lobe separation and open/ closing events)it is possible to build a much more usable RPM range with huge increases in torque and throttle response all while addressing the internal deficiencies of the OE engine.
Recently a client drove his Boxster to us (from Oregon to Ga) for an elective 3.2> 3.6 big bore enhancement.
On the way here he averaged 23 MPg, on the way home he averaged 30mpg. Our engine combination is that much more efficient even when his car made 42HP more at the rear wheels in the "after" evaluation than it did "before".
The best part is the only OE Porsche parts that were used we're chain rails and a gasket set.
The only guy that benefits from my engine is the one who will keep his car forever~
That said, the reasons why the same 3.6 big bore engine always makes more power in the 996 than in a Boxster are numerous and we thoroughly understand all of those elements. We can now make 300rwhp from our 3.2> 3.6 with stock exhaust, stock ecu and a stock intake along with all other stock externals. While everyone was busy bolting on performance I optimized the internals of these engines and continue to.
__________________
Jake Raby/www.flat6innovations.com
IMS Solution/ Faultless Tool Inventor
US Patent 8,992,089 &
US Patent 9,416,697
Developer of The IMS Retrofit Procedure- M96/ M97 Specialist
Last edited by Jake Raby; 02-11-2012 at 04:17 AM.
|
|
|
03-28-2012, 12:19 PM
|
#19
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: O.C. CA
Posts: 3,709
|
Dyno test of a duplicate 3.6 engine
|
|
|
12-20-2012, 06:01 PM
|
#20
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sanford NC
Posts: 2,567
|
But the pros do their homework on the dyno and aren't doing yours as their first. They know the numbers and they drive the results and make sure they work in the real world. It does you no good to have impressive dyno results and have a pig to drive to the supermarket.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:13 AM.
| |