Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Performance and Technical Chat

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-03-2011, 02:24 AM   #1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Ireland
Posts: 46
Replacing air filter

Hi again

Have ordered myself a new K&N filter, should be here soon so just looking to figure out how big a job it is before i get to replacing, when i search i can onlyu find info on de snorkling and removing entire airbox

Anyone any how to guide on just replacing the filter?

McQuaid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2011, 04:03 AM   #2
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,997
Try this:

Pelican Technical Article: Boxster Air Filter / Pollen Filter Replacement - 986 / 987

Might wanna bookmark this page, the source of the above article. It's a pretty good resource:

Pelican Parts - Porsche Boxster 986 / 987 and Carrera 996 / 987 Technical Articles
Frodo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2011, 06:23 AM   #3
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Ireland
Posts: 46
Wow very easy, looks like a great website

Hoping to notice a nice difference with K&N
McQuaid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2011, 06:44 AM   #4
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 19
I just put one in day before yesterday. It looks complicated in the owner's manual but it's very easy. Also I noticed a big difference in power, though the one I removed was in the car when I bought it six months ago and was one of the dirtiest air filters I've ever seen. I see lots of warnings about oiled filters and MAF sensors getting dunked up and failing. As expensive parts go, that's fairly easy to remove as well once you have the top hatch off. Im making it a habit to remove and clean mine frequently and watch for buildup etc. I never saw any posts about failed sensors where they said they cleaned the sensor on a regular basis. I don't know if that will eliminate problems or not, but just wanted to run it by you. I live just off a 55mph road. Since putting in the K&N I can now fishtail around that corner while accelerating, which I didnt have the power to do previously. Good luck! Anyone running an oiled air filter, please chime in on the MAF sensor issue. Have you had to replace yours? Did you ever clean the one that went bad?
Focusyn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2011, 10:44 AM   #5
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: San Diego
Posts: 111
Replacing the air filter is a piece of cake. It's 60 seconds once you get access to the engine compartment.

I bought my 03 986 and immediately replaced the filter -- the dealer who sold it to me didn't bother, and I found the filter to be in pretty bad shape. Dirt and oil on it. No MAF issues though.

Re: K&N impact on HP, a new filter is not an elixir for suddenly adding tons of noticeable HP. Think about it -- would the engineers who design that car really sacrifice HP because of, what, a religious devotion to paper filters? No way. More HP on a sports car directly translates into sales, and no company is going to say "Yeah, we could put that cotton filter in the car and boost HP by 10, but because we just love paper filters, we won't." I'm sure I'll trigger a bunch of posts from some K&N salesman or distributor by posting this, but the notion that you're going to get some huge increase in HP or MPG because of an air filter is fantasy.
ChairmanRon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2011, 05:49 PM   #6
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Eureka, CA
Posts: 332
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChairmanRon View Post
Re: K&N impact on HP, a new filter is not an elixir for suddenly adding tons of noticeable HP. Think about it -- would the engineers who design that car really sacrifice HP because of, what, a religious devotion to paper filters? No way. More HP on a sports car directly translates into sales, and no company is going to say "Yeah, we could put that cotton filter in the car and boost HP by 10, but because we just love paper filters, we won't." I'm sure I'll trigger a bunch of posts from some K&N salesman or distributor by posting this, but the notion that you're going to get some huge increase in HP or MPG because of an air filter is fantasy.
Haha yes, its true. But you don't realize how much stuff is restricted from a car. Headers? Performance exhaust? Air Filters? All of these make your car LOUDER. The average person that buys a porsche doesn't want it to be loud or really cares how fast it is. They usually want it for the badge on the hood. Also, I'm assuming you don't have coil-overs on your car? Why? Price? Comfort? Oh yes, thats the other reason they don't do all this restricted stuff. Adding extra stuff costs money... And adding, what really makes your car "faster", suspension, causes for a huge loss in comfort.

You must realize how restricted you car is before you say how extra HP is big in their minds. Boxsters were built to get LOTS of average people to buy them. And it worked:P (Although on cars like the Boxster Spyder, or Cayman R, or GT3, they are only slightly restricted)
Mrmaddbrad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2011, 09:28 PM   #7
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: San Diego
Posts: 434
1) The average person doesn't buy a Porsche at all.
2) Chinese headers, a fart can, and an enormous cone filter will contribute much more toward making a car loud than making it fast - there's no 1:1 correlation between dB and HP.
3) "You must realize how restricted you car is before you say how extra HP is big in their minds." Wut?
__________________
1999 Carrera 4 • Aero kit • 4" UD Pulley
My Corvette doesn't leak oil... it sweats horsepower.
sd_boxster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2011, 12:44 AM   #8
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Ireland
Posts: 46
I would have thought they didn't put the K&N filters, de cat pipes, sports end cans etc etc due to emission regulations, they would have to make it legal in most countries so a minimum would be set???
McQuaid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2011, 02:00 PM   #9
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: San Diego
Posts: 111
The reason to go with a K&N filter isn't the magical mystery "more horsepower." It's that you can go with just one lifetime filter that you can just clean, instead of disposable filters.
ChairmanRon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2011, 02:11 PM   #10
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,656
^One lifetime filter but definitely more than one MAF sensor... lol.

Last edited by ekam; 11-04-2011 at 04:11 PM.
ekam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2011, 02:58 PM   #11
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Ireland
Posts: 46
Well I for one AM LOVING THE SOUND DIFFERENCE IT HAS MADE!!!
McQuaid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2011, 03:59 PM   #12
Registered Boxster abuser
 
healthservices's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: socal
Posts: 1,014
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChairmanRon View Post
The reason to go with a K&N filter isn't the magical mystery "more horsepower." It's that you can go with just one lifetime filter that you can just clean, instead of disposable filters.
I hate cleaning filters
healthservices is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2011, 05:13 PM   #13
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: San Diego
Posts: 111
Quote:
Originally Posted by ekam View Post
^One lifetime filter but definitely more than one MAF sensor... lol.
That is awesome. It's not a problem, it's a "feature."
ChairmanRon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2011, 05:14 PM   #14
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: San Diego
Posts: 111
Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by McQuaid View Post
Well I for one AM LOVING THE SOUND DIFFERENCE IT HAS MADE!!!
Your air filter changed the sound of the car. Explain this one to me.
ChairmanRon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2011, 10:04 PM   #15
Certified Boxster Addict
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,669
I've used a K&N filter and a paper filter. I've never noticed any difference in power or engine sound (at least that I can readily detect). I have kind of settled back to using stock paper filters just because cleaning the K&N takes more time than throwing the old paper filter in the trash and taking the new one out of the box.
__________________
1999 996 C2 - sold - bought back - sold for more
1997 Spec Boxster BSR #254
1979 911 SC
POC Licensed DE/TT Instructor
thstone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2011, 12:27 AM   #16
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Ireland
Posts: 46
With stock paper filter,ni did hit a desirable engine noise until at least 4k revs, before that it was almost and electric sound as it revved, but now, right from the off I'm getting a lovely rumble throughout the range
McQuaid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2011, 06:21 AM   #17
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Singapore
Posts: 228
When I added a bmc drop in filter, together with the ipd plenum, the intake became alot louder although mine's not desnokled.

I guess the freer flowing bmc filter, with the elimination of the air resonance box on the stock pipe, the larger tb and presumably the smoother flow of air through the plenum, all contributed to create more noise.... and it's a nice noise... Car used to be too "civilized". Now, if I can improve on the exhaust... without causing a headache on my regular 3 hr highway commutes.

In my case, the noise increases significantly after 4k rpm... loud enough to startle my sleeping passenger....

Last edited by shlim8; 11-05-2011 at 06:23 AM.
shlim8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2011, 06:43 AM   #18
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sanford NC
Posts: 2,533
If you increase the airflow through the same area, you are somehow letting more air through with less restriction/filtration. Less filtration means more dirt in the engine, more wear on those parts that scrape together. Every independent study I've read says oiled filters let more dirt and bigger dirt through by significant amounts. And a person I respect did dyno tests and said the air filter the Boxster comes with is good enough to not cause a lack of performance until the motor puts out more than 350 HP.

Could a neglected filter collect enough dirt that it restricted airflow enough to make a HP difference, sure. But replacing with a clean OEM filter would have freed up the airflow just fine.
mikefocke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2011, 07:21 AM   #19
Registered User
 
DenverSteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Denver/Winter Park, CO USA
Posts: 600
This is the same speculative commentary seen in every forum on the web. That somehow K&N filters "must" be inferior because of....pick your reason. They've been tested, raced, proven - over and over again. They have never been shown to let in more of anything but air. A proven commodity to allow more airflow to your engine without negative result. Use them or not they're fine.
__________________
Denver Steve
Carrera, Cabriolet, 6-Speed, Black/Tan
DenverSteve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2011, 12:33 PM   #20
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: atl
Posts: 363
which way does the air flow? got the K&N filter, but want to make sure that i oil the correct side and avoid any further issues with the MAF.

__________________
-Tuan
tuanle16@juno.com
tuanle16 is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page