Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Performance and Technical Chat

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-04-2008, 06:34 PM   #1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Colchester, CT
Posts: 489
Quote:
Originally Posted by Franco
Hi, that is exactly what i was thinking how do you get cold air from an oven
Can we install a 12 volt cooler in the trunk and plug the evo intake tube to that
would make a lot more donkey power
The EVO intake does draw from the outside. It comes with a surround so that it won't suck hot air from inside the engine. I did mine and love the results. Besides, I needed to replace the pipe that the MAF was installed on anyways so it was worth while. Great sound too (especially combined with the PSE).

I just tore out my old air box. I figured that if I ever want to go stock again I'll just order one up from a dismantler.
Chris
__________________
1999 986 2.5L, Stock Exhaust (S muffler), EVO Intake, 18" Stock rims (17" during winter), IMS Upgrade, 150k+ miles and counting!
87 944S brought back to life
Dragonwind is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2008, 06:15 AM   #2
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: bloomington, in
Posts: 56
i'm very happy with the EVO airbox. stock airbox came out fine in one piece with a bit of patience. didn't lower the engine mount either.

only two sore-spots are the broken plastic tab on the intake vent cover when it was pulled off and the CEL that came on right after the instal (pulled the MAF sensor and cleaned it and CEL went and stayed off). the tab is still broken but the vent stays put ok.

engine pulls smoother through the rev range with a small but noticeable drop in low rpm power and a significant and VERY noticeable increase in high rpm power. and the sound is pure magic.

Last edited by matty-matt; 09-08-2008 at 07:03 AM.
matty-matt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2008, 06:28 AM   #3
Registered User
 
Lil bastard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Du Monde
Posts: 2,199
Quote:
Originally Posted by matty-matt
i'm very happy with the EVO airbox. stock airbox came out fine in one piece with a bit of patience. didn't lower the engine mount either.

only two sore-spots are the broken plastic tab on the intake vent cover when it was pulled off and the CEL that came on right after the instal (pulled the MAF sensor and CEL stayed off). the tab is still broken but the vent stays put ok.

engine pulls smoother through the rev range with a small but noticeable drop in low rpm power and a significant and VERY noticeable increase in high rpm power. and the sound is pure magic.
You're running without a MAF?
__________________
1990 Porsche 964 Carrera 4 Cabriolet
1976 BMW 2002
1990 BMW 325is
1999 Porsche Boxster
(gone, but not forgotten)
http://i933.photobucket.com/albums/a...smiley-003.gif

Never drive faster than your Guardian Angel can fly!
Lil bastard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2008, 07:04 AM   #4
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: bloomington, in
Posts: 56
just edited post. sorry for any confusion. MAF is installed, just cleaned it with electric contact spray.
matty-matt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2008, 03:07 AM   #5
kt1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: S.cali
Posts: 64
Honestly guys, I wouldn't knock Brad Roberts, many 'tuners' say they gain this and that from "feel" but you cannot feel such powers, it's incremental to what you're already used to and negligible by a 'butt dyno.' Only real way is having a dyno run before and after that intake install with same weather condition. If the intake didn't sit in the engine bay like that and actually had an element filter right at our side vent and smooth mandrel bent tubing going to the TB than maybe it'll help.

Side note: So does that X51 not bolt on to the 986's stock manifold's bolt pattern on the heads? That intake manifold looks to be a beast if you had port work done on the head for easier breathing of the engine.
kt1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2008, 04:24 AM   #6
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Colchester, CT
Posts: 489
Quote:
Originally Posted by kt1
Honestly guys, I wouldn't knock Brad Roberts, many 'tuners' say they gain this and that from "feel" but you cannot feel such powers, it's incremental to what you're already used to and negligible by a 'butt dyno.' Only real way is having a dyno run before and after that intake install with same weather condition. If the intake didn't sit in the engine bay like that and actually had an element filter right at our side vent and smooth mandrel bent tubing going to the TB than maybe it'll help.
Where are you getting the idea that the EVO doesn't go to the side intake? The pipe that runs from the EVO to the TB is stock. The EVO comes with a cone filter, small metal pipe to attach the MAF, and a surround that prevents hot air from the engine being taken in. All air comes from the outside.
__________________
1999 986 2.5L, Stock Exhaust (S muffler), EVO Intake, 18" Stock rims (17" during winter), IMS Upgrade, 150k+ miles and counting!
87 944S brought back to life
Dragonwind is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2008, 04:38 PM   #7
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: lex
Posts: 213
Quote:
Originally Posted by kt1

Side note: So does that X51 not bolt on to the 986's stock manifold's bolt pattern on the heads? That intake manifold looks to be a beast if you had port work done on the head for easier breathing of the engine.


well I can say this with one hundred percent certainty... a 3.2 intake manifold will NOT fit on a 3.6... the bolt pattern is different... one side (dont remember which) could be drilled and tapped, but the other couldn't


ANYbody have a part number on that 3.6 x51 intake manifold and TB????
__________________
Lexington, KY Go CATS!
http://i187.photobucket.com/albums/x...s/DSCN0406.jpg
2001 986S... 3.6 swap (yep 7.2->7.8), PSS9's, GT3 seats, OEM 986 Carrera 5-spokes, and much more http://i187.photobucket.com/albums/x...me/burnout.gif
1987 928 S4 white on red and... dead
2004 Chevy Surburban... drinks gas like its cheap or something
easyc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2008, 03:04 AM   #8
Registered User
 
edevlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 916
"Real live engineering data says the actual inlets on the side of the Boxster are TOO LOW. If Porsche had moved them up on the sides of the car, they would actually flow more than the 50% they flow now."

Not only that, but you would not be sucking up brake dust from the front brake. All it takes is a couple of hundred miles of driving and a clean filter element is pretty well covered with the black dust.....

Ed

__________________
My Car Webpage

2000 2.7L Boxster 102K; TTP intake, headers, high-flow cats; Dansk high-flow muffler; Autothority ECU chip; TechnoTorque 2; Bilstein coilovers; Racing Dynamics strut brace; stress-bar suspension kit; Aasco lightweight flywheel, B&M short shiftkit; 18" wheels; spare tire delete; OEM GT3 seats; JL audio speakers and subwoofer; Alpine PDX-5/PDX-2 amps; Kenwood DNX8120 CD/DVD/Nav; litronics, deambered
edevlin is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page