02-28-2008, 08:12 AM
|
#1
|
Porscheectomy
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Seattle Area
Posts: 3,011
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Topless
Here is what Porsche says about their tuned intake:
"The Boxster inherits its twin-resonance air induction system from the 911
Carrera. The system acts as a “resonance supercharger,” allowing the engine
to draw from higher velocity airflow at certain engine speeds. A crossover pipe
connects the individual air collector/resonance chambers for each cylinder bank.
A flap in the pipe remains closed from idle to about 3,100 rpm. When it opens,
each cylinder bank can draw from airflow “excited” by the resonance created by
alternating induction between all six cylinders. In essence, “dual resonance”
creates two induction paths for each cylinder. Below 3,000 rpm, the cylinders
draw air from a “short” path. From 3,000 rpm to about 5,100 rpm – when the
resonance flap opens – the cylinders draw from a long intake path, which
boosts torque. Above 5,100 rpm, the flap again closes to allow the cylinders
to draw intake air from a shorter intake path to boost horsepower at higher
engine speeds."
They don't address that little res. box specifically but others in this forum have removed it, dynoed and lost torque and HP. I gotta believe it is a small part of their tuned intake system. The GT3RS has 3 res. chambers. Somebody thinks they are important. It's sort of like tuning a subwoofer cabinet. You adjust cabinet volume, dampening and port size to maximize certain desired frequencies (or RPM's).
Does this make any sense to anyone or am I just a lone voice deep in left field??
|
The intake plenums and the tubes connecting them are definitely meant to help intake charging, both by changing tract length and pressure wave control. The little box doesn't have the same function.
Are you saying that other people on this forum have removed the little box and found a power reduction?
|
|
|
02-28-2008, 09:14 AM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 916
|
'Am I missing something here? Is the resonance box just a muffler to reduce intake noise or is it an important part of the factory tuned intake. With a properly tuned intake, sonic waves from the intake pulse combine with airflow to force charge the cylinders as much as 125% of airflow alone. Porsche has been tuning this for a long time to give us better top end power and that nice big fat torque curve that gets us out of corners quickly.
I don't know the answer to this, just raising the question. Tuning an intake/exhaust is a lot more like tuning a musical instrument than we realize. It would be disappointing to remove the res. box and get a narrowing of the torque curve and lose 10hp in the process. Faster good, Slower bad! Any Porsche racing techs in the know on this? '
I added a TTP intake which effectively deleted the muffler, at the same time I had the car chipped, so I dont know what effect the change in the intake alone had on the cars performance. When I dynoed it after the intake and chip combination, I picked up about 20hp, then picked up another few with headers on my 2.7. I have a photo of the intake tube at my website below my signature.
Ed
__________________
My Car Webpage
2000 2.7L Boxster 102K; TTP intake, headers, high-flow cats; Dansk high-flow muffler; Autothority ECU chip; TechnoTorque 2; Bilstein coilovers; Racing Dynamics strut brace; stress-bar suspension kit; Aasco lightweight flywheel, B&M short shiftkit; 18" wheels; spare tire delete; OEM GT3 seats; JL audio speakers and subwoofer; Alpine PDX-5/PDX-2 amps; Kenwood DNX8120 CD/DVD/Nav; litronics, deambered
|
|
|
03-02-2008, 01:38 PM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Alta Loma, CA
Posts: 1,334
|
Anyone recall the Excellence article where they pulled the pants down on EVO's intake tubes?? Ha ha  the car's made LESS hp than stock?? If it isn't raining here in SoCal, the car will go to dyno Tuesday.
How about you ask TTP to show us their finding's? Surely they tested the stock components so they could improve on 100's of Porsche engineers work (partially being sarcastic) I just get tired of the BS claims by armchair engineers who make something for our cars and never thoroughly test it.. but release it. Kinda like MickeySoft.
B
__________________
Engine Builds, Transmission Builds, Engine Conversions, Suspension Installs, Suspension Tuning, Driver Coaching, Data Acquisition, Video, SCCA/PCA/POC/NASA/GRAND AM/ALMS.
We have worked with amateur and professional drivers for over 26 years. In house machinist, In house fabrication. Our cars, our parts, our engines, our transmission's run nationwide at events every weekend. We work side by side with industry names developing parts.
|
|
|
03-02-2008, 02:28 PM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 916
|
"How about you ask TTP to show us their finding's? Surely they tested the stock components so they could improve on 100's of Porsche engineers work (partially being sarcastic) I just get tired of the BS claims by armchair engineers who make something for our cars and never thoroughly test it.. but release it. Kinda like MickeySoft."
Good point, I was quite suprised to what claims were made by many companies for performance enhancements to our cars. I think the TTP intake I am using was really designed for their twin turbo mod, which could use the higher flow rate that the intake provides.
Based on my experience, TTP seems to be making pretty reasonable claims for their performance enhancing products. They say you should get about 25hp when you use the combination of their intake, exhaust and chip. Those numbers are pretty much what I got on the dyno when I added them all to my car.
That beign said, in hindsight, I would be suprised if the stock intake on 2.7L cars offers much restriction in airflow, even if cars are fitted with modified exhaust systems, but it sure sounds sweet....
Ed,
__________________
My Car Webpage
2000 2.7L Boxster 102K; TTP intake, headers, high-flow cats; Dansk high-flow muffler; Autothority ECU chip; TechnoTorque 2; Bilstein coilovers; Racing Dynamics strut brace; stress-bar suspension kit; Aasco lightweight flywheel, B&M short shiftkit; 18" wheels; spare tire delete; OEM GT3 seats; JL audio speakers and subwoofer; Alpine PDX-5/PDX-2 amps; Kenwood DNX8120 CD/DVD/Nav; litronics, deambered
|
|
|
05-08-2010, 05:41 PM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: toronto
Posts: 2,668
|
Early on in this thread (1st page) there was a diagram posted showing clamp #4 and a small hose teeing off the main intake pipe. What is this for and how do the after market pipes handle this?
|
|
|
10-14-2013, 01:01 PM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 310
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaykay
Early on in this thread (1st page) there was a diagram posted showing clamp #4 and a small hose teeing off the main intake pipe. What is this for and how do the after market pipes handle this?
|
I'd like to second this question. I'm looking to put the 2.5l intake on the 2.7l but I noticed some engines with the auxiliary tube and some without? I'm not sure what to put into google to find some literature on it. Anyone have a clue what it's for?
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:15 AM.
| |