Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Performance and Technical Chat

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-14-2007, 05:33 AM   #21
Registered User
 
Brucelee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 8,083
Smile

I forgot to mention that the new M3 has a new optional automatic trans.

Dual clutch SEVEN speed auto.

Not bad.

__________________
Rich Belloff

Brucelee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2007, 08:40 AM   #22
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,460
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brucelee
I forgot to mention that the new M3 has a new optional automatic trans.

Dual clutch SEVEN speed auto.

Not bad.
Though technically, it's not an automatic. It's a manual that shifts automatically. Tiptronic is an automatic.
__________________
.
1997 Honda Accord | V6
2004 BMW 330i | ZHP | SOLD
2000 Porsche Boxster | SOLD | http://www.986forum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=9114

http://www.kryzak.com/storage/986sig12.jpg

http://kryzak.tumblr.com
Jeph is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2007, 09:01 AM   #23
Registered User
 
Brucelee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 8,083
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeph
Though technically, it's not an automatic. It's a manual that shifts automatically. Tiptronic is an automatic.

What is the practical difference???

__________________
Rich Belloff

Brucelee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2007, 12:52 PM   #24
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: MD
Posts: 447
The practical difference is that it can shift faster than a traditional manual but does not have the parasitic losses and slow response of a traditional automatic.

I'd still take the regular stick shift. But I'm sure it will be worlds better than BMW's previous auto-clutch manual, the SMG, which was just horrendous anywhere except on a track.
John V is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2007, 02:28 PM   #25
Registered User
 
Brucelee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 8,083
Quote:
Originally Posted by John V
The practical difference is that it can shift faster than a traditional manual but does not have the parasitic losses and slow response of a traditional automatic.

I'd still take the regular stick shift. But I'm sure it will be worlds better than BMW's previous auto-clutch manual, the SMG, which was just horrendous anywhere except on a track.

I have heard that nobody likes the SMG.

It will be interesting to see how this new trans performs.

Candidly, I think it is time for a new Tip in the Boxster.

__________________
Rich Belloff

Brucelee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2007, 08:41 PM   #26
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Poway, CA
Posts: 191
for what its worth, all the reviewers in the roundel are raving about the new autotranny in the 335i twin turbo, almost all of them are saying it is so good and well mated to the engine they would choose it over the 6 speed stick

but I aint that old yet........
__________________
Arctic Silver 2000 Boxster 3.4l w/Sport Design Package
Supersprint Boxster S Headers/Cats/Muffler
AASCO Lt. Wt FLywheel
Evo Intake
Partial Carbon Interior
Black Leather Sport seats
M030 Sway Bars
Litronics w/ Clear Corners
Boxster S brakes
B&M Short Shifter
PnP rear Speakers + Amp
pecivil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2007, 08:54 PM   #27
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Illinois
Posts: 3,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brucelee
I have heard that nobody likes the SMG.

It will be interesting to see how this new trans performs.

Candidly, I think it is time for a new Tip in the Boxster.



Porsche supposedly will intro a new twin clutch setup like the VW/Audi version in the next 2 yrs or so which should be head and shoulders above the "tip."
__________________
'03 3.2L GuardsRed/Blk/Blk---6Spd
Options: Litronics, 18" Carrera lights, Bose sound, Painted to match roll bars.
http://i100.photobucket.com/albums/m...Mautocross.jpg
Adam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2007, 05:10 AM   #28
Registered User
 
Pilot2519j's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Huntersville, NC
Posts: 655
I drove the M-3 before I bought the Boxster and I did not like it. The styling line of BMW with the high belt line in the trunk and I don't find pleasing at all to look. I also drove the new body S-4 when it came out in 2004 and it really felt heavy. I thought I was driving a truck. Lots of power but the car felt and looked heavy. In the last few years I don't know if Audi addressed the weight problem. As far as BMW Hans Stuck has been driving the V-8 in competition for a few years so it must be a fine engine at this point. Still I rather have a Boxster which has plenty of power which we can't use and ride that is heavenly.
__________________
Pluralitas non est ponenda sine neccesitate
Pilot2519j is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2007, 10:04 AM   #29
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: MD
Posts: 447
Audi has addressed the weight problem by making the S4 even heavier than previous iterations.
John V is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2007, 07:30 AM   #30
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 16
That thing is a bloody beast I tell ya

dapper_boxster is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page