Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > DIY Project Guides

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-12-2015, 11:20 AM   #1
Registered Boxster abuser
 
healthservices's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: socal
Posts: 1,014
Last one I did was on a car with ~256k and it appears to be the original bearing so I think it was probably getting close to the end of its service life...

http://986forum.com/forums/396523-post10.html


Last edited by healthservices; 07-12-2015 at 08:08 AM.
healthservices is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2015, 12:12 PM   #2
Registered User
 
flaps10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Tacoma
Posts: 429
What the hell? Four posts in and no one has attempted to shut this thread down as paranoia?

I've posted my EPS roller install here in this sub forum, but if you would like to data collect in a specific manner I'll put up the specifics.
flaps10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2015, 01:20 PM   #3
Motorist & Coffee Drinker
 
78F350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 3,952
Garage
I was fortunate to have a bad engine to practice on before I worked on my good engine. I had the Pelican Parts kit, a LN Retrofit tool, the 101 projects book, the Bentley manual, and a set of factory service manuals. I reviewed several threads here and watched some decent YouTube videos before I started.
The problem came when I tried putting in the set-screws that came with the Pelican kit and realized that one of them was not in contact the IMS with the engine set to TDC. So I unlocked the camshaft and rotated the crankshaft slightly until all three screws had a grip. Having read through a variety of procedures, I was not following any one in particular. Heck, how hard can it be?
The bearing came out pretty easily, but once it was out it the set-screws shifted and the shaft moved about 1/4 - 3/8" inch to the side. Re-installing the old bearing in the bad engine I managed to get the bearing in position, but never fully installed the cover.
Lesson learned: Set-scews are bad. Pinning at TDC and locking the cam from the start, until fully reinstalled is good.
Installing the bearing in my good engine went pretty well. I did the procedure in this guide which is pretty much like the one from LN, but with great color pictures.
Both bearings were dual row with about 125k miles and rolled pretty smoothly, but the grease was completely gone and the shafts had foul smelling oil inside.
My related threads:
http://986forum.com/forums/general-discussions/54527-maint-do-swapping-used-2-7-a.html
http://986forum.com/forums/general-discussions/54660-little-scoring-2-rod.html
http://986forum.com/forums/general-discussions/54973-got-my-salvage-01-road.html

Enough about me. We need to get the summary of the Gonzojive adventure in this thread.

Last edited by 78F350; 04-12-2015 at 01:31 PM.
78F350 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2015, 01:32 PM   #4
Engine Surgeon
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland GA USA
Posts: 2,425
Quote:
Lesson learned: Set-scews are bad.
Yet people keep doing it. I haven't read or heard of one instance where someone used them and loved the concept. Not once.
__________________
Jake Raby/www.flat6innovations.com
IMS Solution/ Faultless Tool Inventor
US Patent 8,992,089 &
US Patent 9,416,697
Developer of The IMS Retrofit Procedure- M96/ M97 Specialist
Jake Raby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2015, 03:37 PM   #5
Registered User
 
jsceash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,466
Garage
I'm sure I'll get flamed but hear goes. I've done 4 LN bearings.

1. I bought the LN bearing and tool kit 2010 when I replaced the clutch in my 2.7 original motor (36.5K). This was done with the motor in the car, with LNs tools. I pinned the crank. Locked the cams released tension on the chain as note on Pelican's instruction and I used set screws that were 35mm long they worked out just fine. This motor was removed running at about 47K January 2013.

2. My 3.2/3.6 motor upgrade rebuild. I replace with LN bearing when the motor was going back together. I pulled it with LN's tool, installed with a press and LNs sleeve. This was done the winter of 2012-13 along with an LN cylinder resize, pistons, valves, springs, all gaskets bearings and some head work. Other than the LN cylinder work, everything else I did. It ran great the first time it turned over.

3. I removed the 3.6 motor again with a lot of on track time this past winter 2014-15 to make sure there was no serious problems because it had a lifter tap on cylinder 4. While it was out I decided to make more improvements ended up adding new rods, bearings, gaskets, heads from a 2006 that were almost new just over 10,000 miles machine work on the heads, and another new LN bearing. The bearing again the same way as the last one, was done as the motor was being reassembled. It ran well and has been track tested.

4. My Insurance motor the original 2.7 just finished rebuilding from the inside out. Stock everything but a LN sump spacer X51 style baffle and new LN IMS.
__________________
2003 Black 986. modified for Advanced level HPDE and open track days.
* 3.6L LN block, 06 heads, Carrillo H rods, IDP with 987 intake, Oil mods, LN IMS. * Spec II Clutch, 3.2L S Spec P-P FW. * D2 shocks, GT3 arms & and links, Spacers front and rear * Weight reduced, No carpet, AC deleted, Remote PS pump, PS pump deleted. Recaro Pole position seats, Brey crouse ext. 5 point harness, NHP sport exhaust
jsceash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2015, 04:42 PM   #6
Beginner
 
Jamesp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,659
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsceash View Post
I'm sure I'll get flamed but hear goes. I've done 4 LN bearings.
I'm hoping nobody gets flamed in this string. I'm certainly not flaming anyone. The intent is to create a string that anyone who is thinking about changing the IMSB can visit and get concentrated information on what people did, and why. That includes everyone and every idea on the fix. I was hoping for the benefits for a roller bearing discussion as folks with technical backgrounds have made that choice. No flames, just a technical discussion on why each solution was chosen. And I too am hoping for Gonzojive.
__________________
2003 S manual
Jamesp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2015, 05:45 AM   #7
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 160
I finally got my car back together after doing an imsb replacement. I went with the pelican bearing since I already had a single row bearing with a lot of mileage. I will be treating it as a maintenance item and just replace it every so often. I haven't decided how often yet but the car only gets about 5,000 miles a year.so I should be good for a while. The hardest part was disassembling everything to get to the bearing. Putting everything back together was much easier with the exception of reinstalling the transmission. That was a pain! Otherwise, with the proper tools and instructions (thanks Jake!) it was actually a breeze. Keep your workspace neat and keep track of where everything goes and there shouldn't be any issues. And thanks again to all on this forum for advice and insight!
Viper10000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page